A Practical Guide to Grade Adjustment or Curving for Pharmacy and Other Professional Health Programs.

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.3390/pharmacy13010004
Reza Mehvar
{"title":"A Practical Guide to Grade Adjustment or Curving for Pharmacy and Other Professional Health Programs.","authors":"Reza Mehvar","doi":"10.3390/pharmacy13010004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The peer-reviewed literature on the adjustment or curving of assessments in health profession programs is almost non-existent. This communication aims to present potential methods of grade adjustment for individual questions or entire assessments. Simulated data for a 25-item assessment were used as an example to analyze the effects of different methods of grade adjustment on students' scores. Grade adjustments were made by adjusting the points for individual questions or the scores for the entire assessment. Adjustment for the individual questions was carried out by dropping the question, adding points to those who missed the question, or adding a bonus point to all students. Grade adjustment methods for the entire assessment included adjusting the mean or mean plus distribution (i.e., standard deviation) of the assessment score. Different methods of grade adjustments or curving for individual questions or the entire assessment resulted in drastically different outcomes for individual students' scores. The justifications for selecting the appropriate method for adjustment of the individual scores are presented based on item analysis statistics. Curving or adjusting the score for the entire exam may be justified when there is a need for consistency in grade distribution among the assessments across the years or different sections of the course. Although methods for adjustment of grades are relatively easy to implement, instructors should have reasonable educational justification for deciding whether to adjust grades or which method to use.</p>","PeriodicalId":30544,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755611/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy13010004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The peer-reviewed literature on the adjustment or curving of assessments in health profession programs is almost non-existent. This communication aims to present potential methods of grade adjustment for individual questions or entire assessments. Simulated data for a 25-item assessment were used as an example to analyze the effects of different methods of grade adjustment on students' scores. Grade adjustments were made by adjusting the points for individual questions or the scores for the entire assessment. Adjustment for the individual questions was carried out by dropping the question, adding points to those who missed the question, or adding a bonus point to all students. Grade adjustment methods for the entire assessment included adjusting the mean or mean plus distribution (i.e., standard deviation) of the assessment score. Different methods of grade adjustments or curving for individual questions or the entire assessment resulted in drastically different outcomes for individual students' scores. The justifications for selecting the appropriate method for adjustment of the individual scores are presented based on item analysis statistics. Curving or adjusting the score for the entire exam may be justified when there is a need for consistency in grade distribution among the assessments across the years or different sections of the course. Although methods for adjustment of grades are relatively easy to implement, instructors should have reasonable educational justification for deciding whether to adjust grades or which method to use.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药剂学和其他专业健康课程的年级调整或曲线实用指南。
同行评议的关于卫生专业项目评估调整或曲线化的文献几乎不存在。本通讯的目的是提出针对个别问题或整个评估的可能的成绩调整方法。以25项评估模拟数据为例,分析不同年级调整方法对学生成绩的影响。成绩调整是通过调整个别问题的分数或整个评估的分数来实现的。个别问题的调整是通过删除问题,给没有回答的学生加分,或者给所有学生加加分来进行的。整个评估的等级调整方法包括调整评估分数的平均值或平均值加分布(即标准差)。个别问题或整个评估的分数调整或曲线的不同方法导致个别学生的分数结果截然不同。根据项目分析统计,提出了选择适当方法调整个人分数的理由。当需要在不同年份或课程不同部分的评估中保持成绩分布的一致性时,调整或调整整个考试的分数可能是合理的。虽然调整成绩的方法相对容易实施,但教师在决定是否调整成绩或使用哪种方法时应具有合理的教育理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacy
Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
9.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
PharmReaDy: A Longitudinal Platform for Industry Career Preparation for Student Pharmacists in the U.S. Self-Management, Adherence, and the Role of Pharmaceutical Care in Patients with T2DM in Primary Practice: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Bulgaria. AIM (Analyze-Interpret-Manage): A Novel NAPLEX-Aligned Analytical Assessment Framework for Measuring Individual and Team Critical Thinking Using Generative AI. Pharmacist-Led Flu Vaccination Services in Romanian Community Pharmacies: Barriers, Perceptions, and Implementation Challenges. Impact of a Pharmacist-Driven Penicillin Allergy De-Labeling Service (PADLS) on Hospitalized Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1