The effect of midazolam co-induction on cardiorespiratory variables, myoclonus and etomidate dose requirements in healthy cats

IF 1.9 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1016/j.vaa.2024.12.009
Samantha M. Gieger , Stephanie CJ. Keating , Danielle E. Strahl-Heldreth , Felipe Martins , Gene Pavlovsky , Patricia M. Oba , Kelly S. Swanson
{"title":"The effect of midazolam co-induction on cardiorespiratory variables, myoclonus and etomidate dose requirements in healthy cats","authors":"Samantha M. Gieger ,&nbsp;Stephanie CJ. Keating ,&nbsp;Danielle E. Strahl-Heldreth ,&nbsp;Felipe Martins ,&nbsp;Gene Pavlovsky ,&nbsp;Patricia M. Oba ,&nbsp;Kelly S. Swanson","doi":"10.1016/j.vaa.2024.12.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate dose requirements of etomidate for endotracheal intubation, with or without midazolam co-induction, and to describe induction quality and associated cardiorespiratory variables in healthy cats.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Randomized prospective experimental study.</div></div><div><h3>Animals</h3><div>A group of 24 adult neutered cats (17 females, seven males).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Cats were premedicated with intramuscular butorphanol (0.4 mg kg<sup>–1</sup>) and alfaxalone (2 mg kg<sup>–1</sup>), and anesthesia was induced with etomidate following midazolam (0.3 mg kg<sup>–1</sup>) or physiologic saline (0.06 mL kg<sup>–1</sup>) intravenously. Heart rate, respiratory rate (<em>f</em><sub>R</sub>) and arterial blood pressure were measured following premedication, at co-induction, after etomidate administration, and after orotracheal intubation and compared using repeated-measures <span>anova</span>. Pre- and post-etomidate blood samples were assessed for the presence of hemolysis. Etomidate dose requirements and prevalence of myoclonus were compared with Wilcoxon signed ranks test and Fisher’s test. Values of <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05 were considered significant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Mean ± standard deviation etomidate doses required for orotracheal intubation were 0.84 ± 0.26 and 1.39 ± 0.33 mg kg<sup>–1</sup> for midazolam and saline co-induction, respectively (<em>p</em> = 0.001). The presence of myoclonus at sedated baseline, co-induction and etomidate was 6/12, 8/12 and 9/12 in the saline group, respectively, and 10/12, 2/12 and 0/12 in the midazolam group. The prevalence of myoclonus was lower in the midazolam group after co-induction and etomidate injection (<em>p</em> = 0.036 and <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001, respectively). Cardiorespiratory variables did not differ between groups at any time point. Compared with baseline, <em>f</em><sub>R</sub> decreased in both groups after etomidate injection and intubation. Hemolysis was observed in all post-etomidate plasma samples.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical relevance</h3><div>Etomidate, with or without midazolam co-induction, provides acceptable cardiovascular function in premedicated healthy cats. Midazolam reduces etomidate requirements for orotracheal intubation and improves induction quality in cats premedicated with intramuscular butorphanol–alfaxalone.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23626,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia","volume":"52 2","pages":"Pages 192-199"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467298724004264","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate dose requirements of etomidate for endotracheal intubation, with or without midazolam co-induction, and to describe induction quality and associated cardiorespiratory variables in healthy cats.

Study design

Randomized prospective experimental study.

Animals

A group of 24 adult neutered cats (17 females, seven males).

Methods

Cats were premedicated with intramuscular butorphanol (0.4 mg kg–1) and alfaxalone (2 mg kg–1), and anesthesia was induced with etomidate following midazolam (0.3 mg kg–1) or physiologic saline (0.06 mL kg–1) intravenously. Heart rate, respiratory rate (fR) and arterial blood pressure were measured following premedication, at co-induction, after etomidate administration, and after orotracheal intubation and compared using repeated-measures anova. Pre- and post-etomidate blood samples were assessed for the presence of hemolysis. Etomidate dose requirements and prevalence of myoclonus were compared with Wilcoxon signed ranks test and Fisher’s test. Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Mean ± standard deviation etomidate doses required for orotracheal intubation were 0.84 ± 0.26 and 1.39 ± 0.33 mg kg–1 for midazolam and saline co-induction, respectively (p = 0.001). The presence of myoclonus at sedated baseline, co-induction and etomidate was 6/12, 8/12 and 9/12 in the saline group, respectively, and 10/12, 2/12 and 0/12 in the midazolam group. The prevalence of myoclonus was lower in the midazolam group after co-induction and etomidate injection (p = 0.036 and p < 0.001, respectively). Cardiorespiratory variables did not differ between groups at any time point. Compared with baseline, fR decreased in both groups after etomidate injection and intubation. Hemolysis was observed in all post-etomidate plasma samples.

Conclusions and clinical relevance

Etomidate, with or without midazolam co-induction, provides acceptable cardiovascular function in premedicated healthy cats. Midazolam reduces etomidate requirements for orotracheal intubation and improves induction quality in cats premedicated with intramuscular butorphanol–alfaxalone.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
咪达唑仑共诱导对健康猫心肺变量、肌阵挛和依托咪酯剂量需求的影响。
目的:评价咪达唑仑联合诱导或不联合诱导时依托咪酯用于气管插管的剂量要求,并描述诱导质量和相关的心肺变量。研究设计:随机前瞻性实验研究。动物:一组24只成年绝育猫(17只母猫,7只公猫)。方法:猫先肌内注射布托啡诺(0.4 mg kg-1)和阿法索龙(2 mg kg-1),咪达唑仑(0.3 mg kg-1)或生理盐水(0.06 mL kg-1)后静脉注射依托咪酯诱导麻醉。分别在用药前、共诱导、依托咪酯给药后和经气管插管后测量心率、呼吸率(fR)和动脉血压,并采用重复测量方差分析进行比较。使用依托咪酯前后的血液样本被评估是否存在溶血。采用Wilcoxon sign ranks检验和Fisher检验比较依托咪酯的剂量要求和肌阵挛的发生率。p < 0.05为显著性。结果:咪达唑仑和生理盐水共诱导气管插管所需依托咪酯剂量的平均值±标准差分别为0.84±0.26和1.39±0.33 mg kg-1 (p = 0.001)。生理盐水组在镇静基线、共诱导和依托咪酯时肌晕的出现率分别为6/12、8/12和9/12,咪达唑仑组为10/12、2/12和0/12。咪达唑仑组与依托咪酯组共诱导后肌阵挛发生率较低(p = 0.036, p < 0.001)。在任何时间点,两组之间的心肺变量均无差异。与基线相比,注射依托咪酯和插管后两组fR均下降。所有服用依托咪酯后的血浆样本均出现溶血现象。结论及临床意义:依托咪酯与或不与咪达唑仑共诱导,可为预先用药的健康猫提供可接受的心血管功能。咪达唑仑减少了经气管插管对依托咪酯的需求,并改善了预先肌注布托啡诺-阿尔法霉素的猫的诱导质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia
Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
17.60%
发文量
91
审稿时长
97 days
期刊介绍: Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia is the official journal of the Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists, the American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia and the European College of Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. Its purpose is the publication of original, peer reviewed articles covering all branches of anaesthesia and the relief of pain in animals. Articles concerned with the following subjects related to anaesthesia and analgesia are also welcome: the basic sciences; pathophysiology of disease as it relates to anaesthetic management equipment intensive care chemical restraint of animals including laboratory animals, wildlife and exotic animals welfare issues associated with pain and distress education in veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia. Review articles, special articles, and historical notes will also be published, along with editorials, case reports in the form of letters to the editor, and book reviews. There is also an active correspondence section.
期刊最新文献
Two-point rectus sheath block technique results in more extensive dye spread in the abdominal wall than one-point technique in dog cadavers Validation of the Zürich composite measure pain scale (ZCMPS) for abdominal pain assessment in cows Comparison of two doses of lidocaine constant rate infusion on cardiopulmonary function and recovery in isoflurane-anesthetized horses Accuracy and trending ability of a pulse contour cardiac output monitor (LiDCO™ plus) calibrated with echocardiography in anesthetized dogs: a preliminary study Sedative and physiological effects of intramuscular alfaxalone 4% with butorphanol or dexmedetomidine in dogs – a randomized crossover study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1