Delay discounting predicts COVID-19 vaccine booster willingness.

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Cognitive Research-Principles and Implications Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1186/s41235-024-00609-y
Julia G Halilova, Samuel Fynes-Clinton, Caitlin M Terao, Donna Rose Addis, R Shayna Rosenbaum
{"title":"Delay discounting predicts COVID-19 vaccine booster willingness.","authors":"Julia G Halilova, Samuel Fynes-Clinton, Caitlin M Terao, Donna Rose Addis, R Shayna Rosenbaum","doi":"10.1186/s41235-024-00609-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Developing ways to predict and encourage vaccine booster uptake are necessary for durable immunity responses. In a multi-nation sample, recruited in June-August 2021, we assessed delay discounting (one's tendency to choose smaller immediate rewards over larger future rewards), COVID-19 vaccination status, demographics, and distress level. Participants who reported being vaccinated were invited back one year later (n = 2547) to report their willingness to receive a booster dose, along with reasons for their decision. After controlling for demographic variables and distress level, a greater tendency to discount future rewards was associated with reduced willingness to receive a booster dose. Thematic coding revealed that the most common reason for booster willingness was protection against COVID-19, and for unwillingness was non-necessity. The results identify delay discounting as a behavioral predictor of booster willingness that may be used to inform tailored approaches to increase booster uptake (e.g., trust in science vs. vaccine mandates).</p>","PeriodicalId":46827,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Research-Principles and Implications","volume":"10 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11757841/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Research-Principles and Implications","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-024-00609-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Developing ways to predict and encourage vaccine booster uptake are necessary for durable immunity responses. In a multi-nation sample, recruited in June-August 2021, we assessed delay discounting (one's tendency to choose smaller immediate rewards over larger future rewards), COVID-19 vaccination status, demographics, and distress level. Participants who reported being vaccinated were invited back one year later (n = 2547) to report their willingness to receive a booster dose, along with reasons for their decision. After controlling for demographic variables and distress level, a greater tendency to discount future rewards was associated with reduced willingness to receive a booster dose. Thematic coding revealed that the most common reason for booster willingness was protection against COVID-19, and for unwillingness was non-necessity. The results identify delay discounting as a behavioral predictor of booster willingness that may be used to inform tailored approaches to increase booster uptake (e.g., trust in science vs. vaccine mandates).

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
延迟折扣预测COVID-19疫苗加强者的意愿。
开发预测和鼓励接种疫苗加强剂的方法对于持久的免疫反应是必要的。在2021年6月至8月招募的多国样本中,我们评估了延迟折扣(一个人倾向于选择较小的即时奖励而不是较大的未来奖励)、COVID-19疫苗接种状况、人口统计数据和痛苦程度。报告接种疫苗的参与者在一年后被邀请回来(n = 2547),报告他们是否愿意接受加强剂量,以及他们决定的原因。在控制了人口统计变量和痛苦程度之后,对未来奖励打折的倾向越大,接受加强剂量的意愿就越低。主题编码显示,增强意愿最常见的原因是预防COVID-19,不愿意的原因是不必要的。研究结果表明,延迟折扣是增强疫苗接种意愿的行为预测指标,可用于为提高增强疫苗接种意愿的量身定制方法提供信息(例如,信任科学与疫苗授权)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.30%
发文量
96
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Capturing naturalistic thoughts using a precision experience sampling idiographic approach. The mosaic of experience: How individual differences in attention and working memory shape event segmentation. The effect of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on vigilance, cognition, and mood during military exercise with acute sleep deprivation. Design guidelines for animated data visualization based on perceptual capacity limits. You sure about that? The effects of textual and image-based Skepticism on belief in dubious social-media claims.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1