Prediction of facial nerve outcomes after surgery for vestibular schwannoma using machine learning-based models: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurosurgical Review Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1007/s10143-025-03230-9
Bardia Hajikarimloo, Ibrahim Mohammadzadeh, Mohammad Ali Nazari, Mohammad Amin Habibi, Pourya Taghipour, Seyyed-Ali Alaei, Amirreza Khalaji, Rana Hashemi, Salem M Tos
{"title":"Prediction of facial nerve outcomes after surgery for vestibular schwannoma using machine learning-based models: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Bardia Hajikarimloo, Ibrahim Mohammadzadeh, Mohammad Ali Nazari, Mohammad Amin Habibi, Pourya Taghipour, Seyyed-Ali Alaei, Amirreza Khalaji, Rana Hashemi, Salem M Tos","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03230-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Postoperative facial nerve (FN) dysfunction is associated with a significant impact on the quality of life of patients and can result in psychological stress and disorders such as depression and social isolation. Preoperative prediction of FN outcomes can play a critical role in vestibular schwannomas (VSs) patient care. Several studies have developed machine learning (ML)-based models in predicting FN outcomes following resection of VS. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ML-based models in predicting FN outcomes following resection in the setting of VS. On December 12, 2024, the four electronic databases, Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science, were systematically searched. Studies that evaluated the performance outcomes of the ML-based predictive models were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated through the R program. Five studies with 807 individuals with VS, encompassing 35 models, were included. The meta-analysis showed a pooled sensitivity of 82% (95%CI: 76-87%), specificity of 79% (95%CI: 74-84%), and DOR of 12.94 (95%CI: 8.65-19.34) with an AUC of 0.841. The meta-analysis of the best performance model demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 91% (95%CI: 80-96%), specificity of 87% (95%CI: 82-91%), and DOR of 46.84 (95%CI: 19.8-110.8). Additionally, the analysis demonstrated an AUC of 0.92, a sensitivity of 0.884, and a false positive rate of 0.136 for the best performance models. ML-based models possess promising diagnostic accuracy in predicting FN outcomes following resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"79"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03230-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Postoperative facial nerve (FN) dysfunction is associated with a significant impact on the quality of life of patients and can result in psychological stress and disorders such as depression and social isolation. Preoperative prediction of FN outcomes can play a critical role in vestibular schwannomas (VSs) patient care. Several studies have developed machine learning (ML)-based models in predicting FN outcomes following resection of VS. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ML-based models in predicting FN outcomes following resection in the setting of VS. On December 12, 2024, the four electronic databases, Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science, were systematically searched. Studies that evaluated the performance outcomes of the ML-based predictive models were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated through the R program. Five studies with 807 individuals with VS, encompassing 35 models, were included. The meta-analysis showed a pooled sensitivity of 82% (95%CI: 76-87%), specificity of 79% (95%CI: 74-84%), and DOR of 12.94 (95%CI: 8.65-19.34) with an AUC of 0.841. The meta-analysis of the best performance model demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 91% (95%CI: 80-96%), specificity of 87% (95%CI: 82-91%), and DOR of 46.84 (95%CI: 19.8-110.8). Additionally, the analysis demonstrated an AUC of 0.92, a sensitivity of 0.884, and a false positive rate of 0.136 for the best performance models. ML-based models possess promising diagnostic accuracy in predicting FN outcomes following resection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用基于机器学习的模型预测前庭神经鞘瘤手术后面神经预后:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
术后面神经(FN)功能障碍对患者的生活质量有重大影响,并可导致心理压力和障碍,如抑郁和社会孤立。术前FN预后预测在前庭神经鞘瘤(VSs)患者护理中起着至关重要的作用。一些研究已经开发了基于机器学习(ML)的模型来预测vs切除术后FN结果。这项系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估基于ML的模型在预测vs切除术后FN结果方面的诊断准确性。2024年12月12日,我们系统地检索了Pubmed、Embase、Scopus和Web of Science四个电子数据库。包括评估基于ml的预测模型的性能结果的研究。通过R程序计算合并敏感性、特异性、曲线下面积(AUC)和诊断优势比(DOR)。共纳入5项研究,涉及807名VS患者,共35个模型。荟萃分析显示,合并敏感性为82% (95%CI: 76-87%),特异性为79% (95%CI: 74-84%), DOR为12.94 (95%CI: 8.65-19.34), AUC为0.841。最佳表现模型的荟萃分析显示,合并敏感性为91% (95%CI: 80-96%),特异性为87% (95%CI: 82-91%), DOR为46.84 (95%CI: 19.8-110.8)。此外,分析表明,最佳性能模型的AUC为0.92,灵敏度为0.884,假阳性率为0.136。基于ml的模型在预测FN切除术后预后方面具有良好的诊断准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of second-generation hydrogel embolic coils and bare platinum coils in ruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment: A prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled study. AI applications in lumbar and lumbosacral pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of limited evidence and future directions. Salvage stereotactic radiosurgery following primary microsurgical resection for vestibular schwannomas: A systematic review & meta-analysis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with standard treatment versus standard treatment alone for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Outcomes of orbital-cavernous sinus schwannomas via pterional approach combined with orbital osteotomy: a retrospective study of 32 cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1