Conquering acceptability: A study of stakeholder inclusion practices in evaluation processes in francophone West African Countries

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Evaluation and Program Planning Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102534
Bidossessi M.G. Dossou Kpanou , Jori N. Hall , Kathleen D. Kelsey
{"title":"Conquering acceptability: A study of stakeholder inclusion practices in evaluation processes in francophone West African Countries","authors":"Bidossessi M.G. Dossou Kpanou ,&nbsp;Jori N. Hall ,&nbsp;Kathleen D. Kelsey","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Evaluation practices in the French-speaking countries of the West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU) are poorly understood and infrequently documented. Our study is a descriptive analysis that elucidates how stakeholders are conceptualized and involved in evaluation processes in WAEMU. In these countries, evaluators are concerned about the weak stakeholder involvement in evaluation activity and call for greater stakeholder engagement, juxtaposed to the challenges of doing so. This embedded mixed methods design allowed us to examine stakeholders’ involvement in evaluation processes in the French-speaking WAEMU countries. The results revealed that stakeholders were conceptualized either through structured categorization using established categories in the evaluation literature or through contextual categorization, depending on their relevance to the evaluation process and the information they can provide. Regardless of these categorizations, the primary rationale for stakeholder engagement processes was to achieve acceptable or credible results and to engage the most influential stakeholders. These findings contribute to the evaluation literature by offering a deeper understanding of stakeholder involvement in the WAEMU context.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 102534"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925000011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evaluation practices in the French-speaking countries of the West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU) are poorly understood and infrequently documented. Our study is a descriptive analysis that elucidates how stakeholders are conceptualized and involved in evaluation processes in WAEMU. In these countries, evaluators are concerned about the weak stakeholder involvement in evaluation activity and call for greater stakeholder engagement, juxtaposed to the challenges of doing so. This embedded mixed methods design allowed us to examine stakeholders’ involvement in evaluation processes in the French-speaking WAEMU countries. The results revealed that stakeholders were conceptualized either through structured categorization using established categories in the evaluation literature or through contextual categorization, depending on their relevance to the evaluation process and the information they can provide. Regardless of these categorizations, the primary rationale for stakeholder engagement processes was to achieve acceptable or credible results and to engage the most influential stakeholders. These findings contribute to the evaluation literature by offering a deeper understanding of stakeholder involvement in the WAEMU context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation and Program Planning
Evaluation and Program Planning SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.
期刊最新文献
An evaluation of a 9th and 10th grade Native American virtual pilot: Utilizing a culturally responsive and Inclusive Science model Bridging the gaps in sustainability assessment: A systematic literature review, 2014–2023 Vocational training and employability: A study in reference to skill development program from Gujarat, India Following the science to understand how to reduce prejudice and its harmful consequences: A guide for evaluators and program planners Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1