Bidossessi M.G. Dossou Kpanou , Jori N. Hall , Kathleen D. Kelsey
{"title":"Conquering acceptability: A study of stakeholder inclusion practices in evaluation processes in francophone West African Countries","authors":"Bidossessi M.G. Dossou Kpanou , Jori N. Hall , Kathleen D. Kelsey","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Evaluation practices in the French-speaking countries of the West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU) are poorly understood and infrequently documented. Our study is a descriptive analysis that elucidates how stakeholders are conceptualized and involved in evaluation processes in WAEMU. In these countries, evaluators are concerned about the weak stakeholder involvement in evaluation activity and call for greater stakeholder engagement, juxtaposed to the challenges of doing so. This embedded mixed methods design allowed us to examine stakeholders’ involvement in evaluation processes in the French-speaking WAEMU countries. The results revealed that stakeholders were conceptualized either through structured categorization using established categories in the evaluation literature or through contextual categorization, depending on their relevance to the evaluation process and the information they can provide. Regardless of these categorizations, the primary rationale for stakeholder engagement processes was to achieve acceptable or credible results and to engage the most influential stakeholders. These findings contribute to the evaluation literature by offering a deeper understanding of stakeholder involvement in the WAEMU context.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 102534"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925000011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Evaluation practices in the French-speaking countries of the West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU) are poorly understood and infrequently documented. Our study is a descriptive analysis that elucidates how stakeholders are conceptualized and involved in evaluation processes in WAEMU. In these countries, evaluators are concerned about the weak stakeholder involvement in evaluation activity and call for greater stakeholder engagement, juxtaposed to the challenges of doing so. This embedded mixed methods design allowed us to examine stakeholders’ involvement in evaluation processes in the French-speaking WAEMU countries. The results revealed that stakeholders were conceptualized either through structured categorization using established categories in the evaluation literature or through contextual categorization, depending on their relevance to the evaluation process and the information they can provide. Regardless of these categorizations, the primary rationale for stakeholder engagement processes was to achieve acceptable or credible results and to engage the most influential stakeholders. These findings contribute to the evaluation literature by offering a deeper understanding of stakeholder involvement in the WAEMU context.
期刊介绍:
Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.