Distinct Behavioural and Brain Response Profiles Between Arithmetic Word Problem Solving and Sentence Comprehension in Third and Fourth Graders

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES European Journal of Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1111/ejn.70003
Chan-Tat Ng, Xin-Yu Chen, Ting-Ting Chang
{"title":"Distinct Behavioural and Brain Response Profiles Between Arithmetic Word Problem Solving and Sentence Comprehension in Third and Fourth Graders","authors":"Chan-Tat Ng,&nbsp;Xin-Yu Chen,&nbsp;Ting-Ting Chang","doi":"10.1111/ejn.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Word problems are essential for math learning and education, bridging numerical knowledge with real-world applications. Despite their importance, the neural mechanisms underlying word problem solving, especially in children, remain poorly understood. Here, we examine children's cognitive and brain response profiles for arithmetic word problems (AWPs), which involve one-step mathematical operations, and compare them with nonarithmetic word problems (NWPs), structured as parallel narratives without numerical operations. Behavioural results suggested that AWP performance was associated with both reading comprehension and arithmetic fluency, whereas NWP performance correlated only with reading comprehension. Neuroimaging results revealed distinct neural substrates: AWP solving primarily activated the anterior insula, middle frontal gyrus and intraparietal sulcus, whereas NWP solving engaged in the inferior frontal gyrus, middle temporal gyrus and angular gyrus. Critically, we observed a developmental shift: Children showed heightened prefrontal activation during AWP solving, contrasting with increased posterior parietal engagement in adults. Moreover, although adults demonstrated brain–behaviour associations, with slower AWP solving linked to stronger parietal activation, this relationship was absent in children. Taken together, these findings suggest that AWP solving recruits specialized arithmetic brain circuits that undergo a frontal-to-parietal trajectory. Our study thus provides a neurological basis for AWP solving in children, emphasizing the crucial role of the fronto-insular-parietal network. These insights into brain-based contributions to developmental differences may guide the development of targeted remediation strategies and educational interventions tailored to individual learning needs.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11993,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"61 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejn.70003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Word problems are essential for math learning and education, bridging numerical knowledge with real-world applications. Despite their importance, the neural mechanisms underlying word problem solving, especially in children, remain poorly understood. Here, we examine children's cognitive and brain response profiles for arithmetic word problems (AWPs), which involve one-step mathematical operations, and compare them with nonarithmetic word problems (NWPs), structured as parallel narratives without numerical operations. Behavioural results suggested that AWP performance was associated with both reading comprehension and arithmetic fluency, whereas NWP performance correlated only with reading comprehension. Neuroimaging results revealed distinct neural substrates: AWP solving primarily activated the anterior insula, middle frontal gyrus and intraparietal sulcus, whereas NWP solving engaged in the inferior frontal gyrus, middle temporal gyrus and angular gyrus. Critically, we observed a developmental shift: Children showed heightened prefrontal activation during AWP solving, contrasting with increased posterior parietal engagement in adults. Moreover, although adults demonstrated brain–behaviour associations, with slower AWP solving linked to stronger parietal activation, this relationship was absent in children. Taken together, these findings suggest that AWP solving recruits specialized arithmetic brain circuits that undergo a frontal-to-parietal trajectory. Our study thus provides a neurological basis for AWP solving in children, emphasizing the crucial role of the fronto-insular-parietal network. These insights into brain-based contributions to developmental differences may guide the development of targeted remediation strategies and educational interventions tailored to individual learning needs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三、四年级学生算术解题与句子理解的不同行为与脑反应特征。
应用题对于数学学习和教育是必不可少的,将数字知识与现实世界的应用联系起来。尽管它们很重要,但解决文字问题的神经机制,尤其是儿童的,仍然知之甚少。在这里,我们研究了涉及一步数学运算的算术字词问题(awp)的儿童认知和大脑反应特征,并将其与非算术字词问题(NWPs)进行了比较,后者的结构为平行叙述,没有数字运算。行为学结果表明,AWP表现与阅读理解和算术流畅性均相关,而NWP表现仅与阅读理解相关。神经影像学结果显示不同的神经基质:AWP解决主要激活前岛、额叶中回和顶叶内沟,而NWP解决主要激活额叶下回、颞叶中回和角回。至关重要的是,我们观察到一种发展转变:儿童在解决AWP时表现出更高的前额叶激活,而成人则表现出更高的后顶叶参与。此外,尽管成年人表现出大脑行为的关联,较慢的AWP解决与较强的顶叶激活有关,但这种关系在儿童中并不存在。综上所述,这些发现表明,解决AWP问题需要特殊的大脑运算回路,这些回路经历了从额叶到顶叶的轨迹。因此,我们的研究为儿童AWP解决提供了神经学基础,强调了额岛顶叶网络的关键作用。这些关于大脑对发育差异的贡献的见解可以指导针对个人学习需求的针对性补救策略和教育干预措施的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Neuroscience
European Journal of Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
305
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: EJN is the journal of FENS and supports the international neuroscientific community by publishing original high quality research articles and reviews in all fields of neuroscience. In addition, to engage with issues that are of interest to the science community, we also publish Editorials, Meetings Reports and Neuro-Opinions on topics that are of current interest in the fields of neuroscience research and training in science. We have recently established a series of ‘Profiles of Women in Neuroscience’. Our goal is to provide a vehicle for publications that further the understanding of the structure and function of the nervous system in both health and disease and to provide a vehicle to engage the neuroscience community. As the official journal of FENS, profits from the journal are re-invested in the neuroscientific community through the activities of FENS.
期刊最新文献
Measures of Human Position Sense Do Not Always Include Contributions From Peripheral Sensory Receptors. Fidelity of Sensory Reinnervation in Peroneal and Sural Nerves to Lumbar Dorsal Root Ganglia 4 and 5 After Segmental Injury to the Sciatic Nerve. Modulation of Corticomuscular Coupling With Split-Belt Locomotor Adaptation in Healthy Young Males. MuloAD: A Multiomics Integration Model Utilizing Graph Convolutional Networks for Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis and Biomarker Identification. Mitochondrial-Derived Vesicles: An Emerging Whisperer in Neurological Disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1