Cerebral Lateralization During Handwritten and Typed Word Generation: A Functional Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound Study in Left-Handers and Right-Handers

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES European Journal of Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1111/ejn.70013
Christos Samsouris, Konstantina A. Papadopoulou, Nicholas A. Badcock, Filippos Vlachos, Phivos Phylactou, Marietta Papadatou-Pastou
{"title":"Cerebral Lateralization During Handwritten and Typed Word Generation: A Functional Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound Study in Left-Handers and Right-Handers","authors":"Christos Samsouris,&nbsp;Konstantina A. Papadopoulou,&nbsp;Nicholas A. Badcock,&nbsp;Filippos Vlachos,&nbsp;Phivos Phylactou,&nbsp;Marietta Papadatou-Pastou","doi":"10.1111/ejn.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cerebral lateralization of written language, much like oral language, is predominantly left lateralized. However, handwriting has been the primary focus in lateralization studies. The cerebral lateralization of typing—a widely used method of writing—remains unexamined. This preregistered study aimed to explore the cerebral lateralization of typing versus handwriting and to investigate possible handedness-related differences. We hypothesized that (i) cerebral lateralization would not differ between the two writing methods after movement correction and (ii) both handwriting and typing would show weaker lateralization in left-handers compared to right-handers. To investigate this, we used functional transcranial Doppler (fTCD) ultrasound, a reliable method for assessing cerebral lateralization during language tasks that remains unaffected by movement artifacts, such as those generated by handwriting and typing. A total of 24 left-handers and 30 right-handers participated, performing written word generation through both handwriting and typing on a computer keyboard while undergoing fTCD assessment. We applied a Bayesian framework for our analysis, as it enables us to demonstrate the absence of a difference (i.e., no difference between two variables), which is not possible with the use of <i>p</i> values (estimated under the frequentist framework). Our results provided evidence supporting the absence of a difference in cerebral lateralization between handwriting and typing after movement correction. However, we found no conclusive evidence to either support or refute a difference in lateralization between left-handers and right-handers, suggesting that more research is needed to clarify the role of handedness in cerebral lateralization for different writing methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":11993,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"61 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejn.70013","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejn.70013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cerebral lateralization of written language, much like oral language, is predominantly left lateralized. However, handwriting has been the primary focus in lateralization studies. The cerebral lateralization of typing—a widely used method of writing—remains unexamined. This preregistered study aimed to explore the cerebral lateralization of typing versus handwriting and to investigate possible handedness-related differences. We hypothesized that (i) cerebral lateralization would not differ between the two writing methods after movement correction and (ii) both handwriting and typing would show weaker lateralization in left-handers compared to right-handers. To investigate this, we used functional transcranial Doppler (fTCD) ultrasound, a reliable method for assessing cerebral lateralization during language tasks that remains unaffected by movement artifacts, such as those generated by handwriting and typing. A total of 24 left-handers and 30 right-handers participated, performing written word generation through both handwriting and typing on a computer keyboard while undergoing fTCD assessment. We applied a Bayesian framework for our analysis, as it enables us to demonstrate the absence of a difference (i.e., no difference between two variables), which is not possible with the use of p values (estimated under the frequentist framework). Our results provided evidence supporting the absence of a difference in cerebral lateralization between handwriting and typing after movement correction. However, we found no conclusive evidence to either support or refute a difference in lateralization between left-handers and right-handers, suggesting that more research is needed to clarify the role of handedness in cerebral lateralization for different writing methods.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手写和打字单词生成过程中的大脑偏侧化:左撇子和右撇子的功能性经颅多普勒超声研究
书面语言的大脑侧化,就像口头语言一样,主要是左侧化。然而,手写体一直是侧化研究的主要焦点。打字的大脑侧化——一种广泛使用的书写方式——仍未得到检验。本预注册研究旨在探讨打字与书写的大脑侧化,并调查可能与手性相关的差异。我们假设(i)在运动矫正后,两种书写方式之间的大脑侧化不会有差异;(ii)与右撇子相比,左撇子的书写和打字都表现出较弱的侧化。为了研究这一点,我们使用了功能性经颅多普勒(fTCD)超声,这是一种可靠的方法,用于评估语言任务期间大脑侧化,这些任务不受运动伪影(如手写和打字产生的伪影)的影响。共有24名左撇子和30名右撇子参与其中,他们在接受fTCD评估的同时,通过手写和在电脑键盘上打字来进行文字生成。我们将贝叶斯框架应用于我们的分析,因为它使我们能够证明不存在差异(即两个变量之间没有差异),这是不可能使用p值(在频率主义框架下估计)。我们的研究结果提供了证据,证明在运动矫正后,手写和打字之间的大脑侧化没有差异。然而,我们没有发现确凿的证据来支持或反驳左撇子和右撇子大脑侧化的差异,这表明需要更多的研究来阐明惯用手在不同写作方式的大脑侧化中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Neuroscience
European Journal of Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
305
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: EJN is the journal of FENS and supports the international neuroscientific community by publishing original high quality research articles and reviews in all fields of neuroscience. In addition, to engage with issues that are of interest to the science community, we also publish Editorials, Meetings Reports and Neuro-Opinions on topics that are of current interest in the fields of neuroscience research and training in science. We have recently established a series of ‘Profiles of Women in Neuroscience’. Our goal is to provide a vehicle for publications that further the understanding of the structure and function of the nervous system in both health and disease and to provide a vehicle to engage the neuroscience community. As the official journal of FENS, profits from the journal are re-invested in the neuroscientific community through the activities of FENS.
期刊最新文献
Measures of Human Position Sense Do Not Always Include Contributions From Peripheral Sensory Receptors. Active Task Engagement Enhances Auditory Brain–Behaviour Prediction From Single-Trial EEG Compared With Passive Listening Cortical Beta Oscillations Contributing to Precision Stepping at Gait Initiation Ideal Versus Real Group Mental Representations During Communicative Exchange: A Hyperscanning Study Bi-Cephalic Self-Attended Model to Classify Parkinson's Disease Patients With Freezing of Gait
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1