Identifying Research Priorities for Cognition in CKD: A Delphi Study.

IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Kidney360 Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.34067/KID.0000000708
Jamie Alexiuk, Oksana Harasemiw, Jessica Vanderlinden, Davide Verrelli, Brett Tarca, David Collister, Heitor Ribeiro, Bonnie Corradetti, Kevin Fowler, Fabio Manfredini, Mara McAdams-DeMarco, Nadia Chu, Shilpa Jesudason, Clare McKeaveney, Silvia J Leon, Urmila Anandh, James Tollitt, Stephanie Thompson, Indranil Dasgupta, Clara Bohm
{"title":"Identifying Research Priorities for Cognition in CKD: A Delphi Study.","authors":"Jamie Alexiuk, Oksana Harasemiw, Jessica Vanderlinden, Davide Verrelli, Brett Tarca, David Collister, Heitor Ribeiro, Bonnie Corradetti, Kevin Fowler, Fabio Manfredini, Mara McAdams-DeMarco, Nadia Chu, Shilpa Jesudason, Clare McKeaveney, Silvia J Leon, Urmila Anandh, James Tollitt, Stephanie Thompson, Indranil Dasgupta, Clara Bohm","doi":"10.34067/KID.0000000708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognition is a research priority for people living with chronic kidney disease (CKD), but identification of critical research questions is lacking. This study aimed to determine which cognition-related research questions are most important to CKD stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified Delphi technique with 3 survey rounds was used. The study sample included 3 panels (People with lived CKD experience, Researchers, and Clinicians) recruited through international patient and kidney research networks, kidney societies, and snowball sampling with email invitations. Survey rounds were distributed electronically through REDCap. In Round 1 (October 2021-May 2022), respondents contributed three important research questions regarding cognition in CKD (free text). After deduplication and qualitative synthesis, respondents ranked the importance of these questions on a nine-point Likert scale in Round 2 (Feb-April 2023). Questions with mean and median ratings of >7 by at least two respondent panels or rated critically important by the 'lived experience' panel were re-ranked in Round 3 ( Aug-Sept 2023) and assessed for consensus to identify the final list of priority research questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents (n=152) identified 125 and 44 discrete questions after Rounds 1 and 2, respectively. The final shortlist included 27 questions in 8 categories. The most critical research question identified was \"What factors prevent cognitive impairment in people receiving dialysis?\" Overall, respondents prioritized questions focusing on prevention and treatment of cognitive impairment. Scores between the panels were significantly different for 16 questions. Those with lived CKD experience prioritized quality of life, researchers emphasized developing interventions to mitigate cognitive impairment, and clinicians prioritized the effect of CKD treatment on cognitive impairment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Through an established consensus methodology involving key stakeholder groups, we identified 27 critical research questions about cognition in CKD. These questions should guide future study design and outcome selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":17882,"journal":{"name":"Kidney360","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000000708","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cognition is a research priority for people living with chronic kidney disease (CKD), but identification of critical research questions is lacking. This study aimed to determine which cognition-related research questions are most important to CKD stakeholders.

Methods: A modified Delphi technique with 3 survey rounds was used. The study sample included 3 panels (People with lived CKD experience, Researchers, and Clinicians) recruited through international patient and kidney research networks, kidney societies, and snowball sampling with email invitations. Survey rounds were distributed electronically through REDCap. In Round 1 (October 2021-May 2022), respondents contributed three important research questions regarding cognition in CKD (free text). After deduplication and qualitative synthesis, respondents ranked the importance of these questions on a nine-point Likert scale in Round 2 (Feb-April 2023). Questions with mean and median ratings of >7 by at least two respondent panels or rated critically important by the 'lived experience' panel were re-ranked in Round 3 ( Aug-Sept 2023) and assessed for consensus to identify the final list of priority research questions.

Results: Respondents (n=152) identified 125 and 44 discrete questions after Rounds 1 and 2, respectively. The final shortlist included 27 questions in 8 categories. The most critical research question identified was "What factors prevent cognitive impairment in people receiving dialysis?" Overall, respondents prioritized questions focusing on prevention and treatment of cognitive impairment. Scores between the panels were significantly different for 16 questions. Those with lived CKD experience prioritized quality of life, researchers emphasized developing interventions to mitigate cognitive impairment, and clinicians prioritized the effect of CKD treatment on cognitive impairment.

Conclusions: Through an established consensus methodology involving key stakeholder groups, we identified 27 critical research questions about cognition in CKD. These questions should guide future study design and outcome selection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Kidney360
Kidney360 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Properties of Uremic Solutes That Allow Their Effective Control by Hemodialysis. Identifying Research Priorities for Cognition in CKD: A Delphi Study. Safety and Efficacy of Liraglutide and Semaglutide in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Dose-Response Relationship of Phloretin Therapy on Water and Glucose Transport during Experimental Peritoneal Dialysis. Estimating the Benefit of Transplant Over Dialysis in Candidates Over 55 Years.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1