Biomechanical Comparison of Self-Compressing Screws and Cortical Screw Inserted with Lag Fashion in Canine Cadaveric Humeral Condylar Fracture Model.

IF 2.3 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES Veterinary Sciences Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.3390/vetsci12010072
Jun-Sik Cho, Jung Moon Kim, Youn-Woo Choo, Jooyoung Kim, Sorin Kim, Hwi-Yool Kim
{"title":"Biomechanical Comparison of Self-Compressing Screws and Cortical Screw Inserted with Lag Fashion in Canine Cadaveric Humeral Condylar Fracture Model.","authors":"Jun-Sik Cho, Jung Moon Kim, Youn-Woo Choo, Jooyoung Kim, Sorin Kim, Hwi-Yool Kim","doi":"10.3390/vetsci12010072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compares the compression force of cortical screws used in lag fashion with partially threaded cannulated screws and fully threaded headless cannulated screws as fixation methods for humeral condylar fractures in dogs. Cadavers of eleven dogs weighing an average of 10.99 ± 2.51 kg (6.1-14.4 kg) were used. The humeri were subjected to simulated fracture by performing an osteotomy at the trochlea of humerus and classified into three groups: Group 1 applied a 3.0 mm cortical screw applied in a lag fashion, Group 2 applied a 3.0 mm partially threaded cannulated screw, and Group 3 applied a 3.5 mm fully threaded headless cannulated screw. The samples were then placed in a material testing machine, and a compression force was applied vertically to the lateral condyle until failure. There were statistically significant differences in failure load between the groups (<i>p</i> = 0.009). The maximum failure load in Group 3 was significantly higher than in Group 2 (<i>p</i> = 0.014), while there were no statistically significant differences between Group 1 and Group 2) or between Group 1 and Group 3. Partially threaded cannulated screws and fully threaded headless cannulated screws can be alternatives to traditional stabilization methods, offering simpler procedures and additional advantages.</p>","PeriodicalId":23694,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Sciences","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11769070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12010072","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compares the compression force of cortical screws used in lag fashion with partially threaded cannulated screws and fully threaded headless cannulated screws as fixation methods for humeral condylar fractures in dogs. Cadavers of eleven dogs weighing an average of 10.99 ± 2.51 kg (6.1-14.4 kg) were used. The humeri were subjected to simulated fracture by performing an osteotomy at the trochlea of humerus and classified into three groups: Group 1 applied a 3.0 mm cortical screw applied in a lag fashion, Group 2 applied a 3.0 mm partially threaded cannulated screw, and Group 3 applied a 3.5 mm fully threaded headless cannulated screw. The samples were then placed in a material testing machine, and a compression force was applied vertically to the lateral condyle until failure. There were statistically significant differences in failure load between the groups (p = 0.009). The maximum failure load in Group 3 was significantly higher than in Group 2 (p = 0.014), while there were no statistically significant differences between Group 1 and Group 2) or between Group 1 and Group 3. Partially threaded cannulated screws and fully threaded headless cannulated screws can be alternatives to traditional stabilization methods, offering simpler procedures and additional advantages.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自压螺钉与皮质螺钉在犬尸体肱骨髁骨折模型中的生物力学比较。
本研究比较了皮质螺钉与部分螺纹空心螺钉和全螺纹无头空心螺钉作为犬肱骨髁骨折固定方法的压缩力。使用11只狗的尸体,平均体重为10.99±2.51 kg (6.1-14.4 kg)。在肱骨滑车处行截骨术,模拟肱骨骨折,并将其分为三组:1组使用3.0 mm皮质螺钉,以延迟方式使用,2组使用3.0 mm部分螺纹空心螺钉,3组使用3.5 mm全螺纹无头空心螺钉。然后将样品放置在材料试验机中,并垂直向外侧髁施加压缩力直至破坏。两组间故障负荷差异有统计学意义(p = 0.009)。组3最大失效负荷显著高于组2 (p = 0.014),组1与组2、组1与组3之间差异无统计学意义。部分螺纹空心螺钉和全螺纹无头空心螺钉可以替代传统的稳定方法,提供更简单的程序和额外的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary Sciences
Veterinary Sciences VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
612
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Sciences is an international and interdisciplinary scholarly open access journal. It publishes original that are relevant to any field of veterinary sciences, including prevention, diagnosis and treatment of disease, disorder and injury in animals. This journal covers almost all topics related to animal health and veterinary medicine. Research fields of interest include but are not limited to: anaesthesiology anatomy bacteriology biochemistry cardiology dentistry dermatology embryology endocrinology epidemiology genetics histology immunology microbiology molecular biology mycology neurobiology oncology ophthalmology parasitology pathology pharmacology physiology radiology surgery theriogenology toxicology virology.
期刊最新文献
Economic Impact of Malignant Catarrhal Fever on Cattle Production in Lephalale Municipality, Limpopo Province, South Africa. Reliable Differentiation of a Bivalent Live Salmonella Vaccine and Field Strains: Multi-Supplier Validation of a Disc Diffusion Method. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Global Seroprevalence of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Virus (PRRSV) in Pigs and Wild Boars: A Widespread and Impactful Swine Virus. Without Borders? The Impact of Political Barriers and Land Use on the Animal Health Dynamics and Genetic Structures of Large Game Species in the Carpathian Basin and Surrounding Regions-A Systematic Review. Comparative Analysis of Microbial Community Structure and Function in the Gut of South China Tigers Under Different Dietary Treatments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1