The Efficacy and Safety of Cardiac Myosin Inhibitors Versus Placebo in Patients With Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Chidubem Ezenna MD, BS , Mrinal Murali Krishna MBBS , Meghna Joseph MBBS , Vinicius Pereira , Samia Nadeem MD , Gregory Valania DO , Andrew M. Goldsweig MD, MS
{"title":"The Efficacy and Safety of Cardiac Myosin Inhibitors Versus Placebo in Patients With Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials","authors":"Chidubem Ezenna MD, BS , Mrinal Murali Krishna MBBS , Meghna Joseph MBBS , Vinicius Pereira , Samia Nadeem MD , Gregory Valania DO , Andrew M. Goldsweig MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.01.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) is a genetic disorder characterized by myocardial hypertrophy, which can obstruct left ventricular outflow. Cardiac myosin inhibitors (CMIs) have emerged as a novel therapeutic agent targeting cardiac muscle hypercontractility.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare the efficacy and safety of CMIs mavacamten and aficamten vs. placebo in patients with oHCM.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing mavacamten or aficamten to placebo in patients with symptomatic oHCM. Efficacy outcomes included improvement in peak oxygen consumption (pVO2), New York Heart Association functional class (NYHA-FC) improvement of ≥1 class, change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS), peak left ventricular outflow tract gradient at rest (rLVOT) and with Valsalva maneuver (vLVOT). Safety outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE), serious adverse events (SAE), and atrial fibrillation (AF). Random effects models generated risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using I<sup>2</sup> statistics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The systematic search identified 5 RCTs including 767 patients (mavacamten 30.4%, aficamten 22.2%, placebo 47.4%) with a median follow-up of 24 weeks. Compared to placebo, CMIs were associated with improvement of ≥1 NYHA-FC (RR 2.33; 95% CI, 1.92-2.82), rLVOT (MD -38.70; 95% CI, [-46.30]-[-31.10]), vLVOT (MD -47.29; 95% CI, [-57.99]-[-36.58]), pVO2 (MD 1.66; 95% CI, 1.14-2.18), and KCCQ-CSS (MD 7.76; 95% CI, 5.63-9.90). Safety outcomes were similar between CMIs and placebo.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CMIs are an effective and safe short-term treatment for symptomatic oHCM. Long-term outcomes require further investigation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":"241 ","pages":"Pages 52-60"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914925000463","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) is a genetic disorder characterized by myocardial hypertrophy, which can obstruct left ventricular outflow. Cardiac myosin inhibitors (CMIs) have emerged as a novel therapeutic agent targeting cardiac muscle hypercontractility.
Objective
To compare the efficacy and safety of CMIs mavacamten and aficamten vs. placebo in patients with oHCM.
Methods
We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing mavacamten or aficamten to placebo in patients with symptomatic oHCM. Efficacy outcomes included improvement in peak oxygen consumption (pVO2), New York Heart Association functional class (NYHA-FC) improvement of ≥1 class, change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS), peak left ventricular outflow tract gradient at rest (rLVOT) and with Valsalva maneuver (vLVOT). Safety outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE), serious adverse events (SAE), and atrial fibrillation (AF). Random effects models generated risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics.
Results
The systematic search identified 5 RCTs including 767 patients (mavacamten 30.4%, aficamten 22.2%, placebo 47.4%) with a median follow-up of 24 weeks. Compared to placebo, CMIs were associated with improvement of ≥1 NYHA-FC (RR 2.33; 95% CI, 1.92-2.82), rLVOT (MD -38.70; 95% CI, [-46.30]-[-31.10]), vLVOT (MD -47.29; 95% CI, [-57.99]-[-36.58]), pVO2 (MD 1.66; 95% CI, 1.14-2.18), and KCCQ-CSS (MD 7.76; 95% CI, 5.63-9.90). Safety outcomes were similar between CMIs and placebo.
Conclusion
CMIs are an effective and safe short-term treatment for symptomatic oHCM. Long-term outcomes require further investigation.
期刊介绍:
Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.