The Efficacy and Safety of Cardiac Myosin Inhibitors Versus Placebo in Patients With Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American Journal of Cardiology Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.01.016
Chidubem Ezenna MD, BS , Mrinal Murali Krishna MBBS , Meghna Joseph MBBS , Vinicius Pereira , Samia Nadeem MD , Gregory Valania DO , Andrew M. Goldsweig MD, MS
{"title":"The Efficacy and Safety of Cardiac Myosin Inhibitors Versus Placebo in Patients With Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials","authors":"Chidubem Ezenna MD, BS ,&nbsp;Mrinal Murali Krishna MBBS ,&nbsp;Meghna Joseph MBBS ,&nbsp;Vinicius Pereira ,&nbsp;Samia Nadeem MD ,&nbsp;Gregory Valania DO ,&nbsp;Andrew M. Goldsweig MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.01.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) is a genetic disorder characterized by myocardial hypertrophy, which can obstruct left ventricular outflow. Cardiac myosin inhibitors (CMIs) have emerged as a novel therapeutic agent targeting cardiac muscle hypercontractility.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare the efficacy and safety of CMIs mavacamten and aficamten vs. placebo in patients with oHCM.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing mavacamten or aficamten to placebo in patients with symptomatic oHCM. Efficacy outcomes included improvement in peak oxygen consumption (pVO2), New York Heart Association functional class (NYHA-FC) improvement of ≥1 class, change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS), peak left ventricular outflow tract gradient at rest (rLVOT) and with Valsalva maneuver (vLVOT). Safety outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE), serious adverse events (SAE), and atrial fibrillation (AF). Random effects models generated risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using I<sup>2</sup> statistics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The systematic search identified 5 RCTs including 767 patients (mavacamten 30.4%, aficamten 22.2%, placebo 47.4%) with a median follow-up of 24 weeks. Compared to placebo, CMIs were associated with improvement of ≥1 NYHA-FC (RR 2.33; 95% CI, 1.92-2.82), rLVOT (MD -38.70; 95% CI, [-46.30]-[-31.10]), vLVOT (MD -47.29; 95% CI, [-57.99]-[-36.58]), pVO2 (MD 1.66; 95% CI, 1.14-2.18), and KCCQ-CSS (MD 7.76; 95% CI, 5.63-9.90). Safety outcomes were similar between CMIs and placebo.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CMIs are an effective and safe short-term treatment for symptomatic oHCM. Long-term outcomes require further investigation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":"241 ","pages":"Pages 52-60"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914925000463","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) is a genetic disorder characterized by myocardial hypertrophy, which can obstruct left ventricular outflow. Cardiac myosin inhibitors (CMIs) have emerged as a novel therapeutic agent targeting cardiac muscle hypercontractility.

Objective

To compare the efficacy and safety of CMIs mavacamten and aficamten vs. placebo in patients with oHCM.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing mavacamten or aficamten to placebo in patients with symptomatic oHCM. Efficacy outcomes included improvement in peak oxygen consumption (pVO2), New York Heart Association functional class (NYHA-FC) improvement of ≥1 class, change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS), peak left ventricular outflow tract gradient at rest (rLVOT) and with Valsalva maneuver (vLVOT). Safety outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE), serious adverse events (SAE), and atrial fibrillation (AF). Random effects models generated risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics.

Results

The systematic search identified 5 RCTs including 767 patients (mavacamten 30.4%, aficamten 22.2%, placebo 47.4%) with a median follow-up of 24 weeks. Compared to placebo, CMIs were associated with improvement of ≥1 NYHA-FC (RR 2.33; 95% CI, 1.92-2.82), rLVOT (MD -38.70; 95% CI, [-46.30]-[-31.10]), vLVOT (MD -47.29; 95% CI, [-57.99]-[-36.58]), pVO2 (MD 1.66; 95% CI, 1.14-2.18), and KCCQ-CSS (MD 7.76; 95% CI, 5.63-9.90). Safety outcomes were similar between CMIs and placebo.

Conclusion

CMIs are an effective and safe short-term treatment for symptomatic oHCM. Long-term outcomes require further investigation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Cardiology
American Journal of Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
698
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.
期刊最新文献
Prospective Comparison of Temporal Myocardial Function in Men versus Women After Anterior ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction with Timely Reperfusion. The Relationship Between Syncope and Cardiac Index in Acute Pulmonary Embolism. Editorial Board Contents Adequacy of Loop Diuretic Dosing in Treatment of Acute Heart Failure: Insights from the BAN-ADHF Diuretic Resistance Risk Score.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1