Evaluation of a smartphone-based markerless system to measure lower-limb kinematics in patients with knee osteoarthritis

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS Journal of biomechanics Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112529
Junqing Wang , Wei Xu , Zhuoying Wu , Hui Zhang , Biao Wang , Zongke Zhou , Chen Wang , Kang Li , Yong Nie
{"title":"Evaluation of a smartphone-based markerless system to measure lower-limb kinematics in patients with knee osteoarthritis","authors":"Junqing Wang ,&nbsp;Wei Xu ,&nbsp;Zhuoying Wu ,&nbsp;Hui Zhang ,&nbsp;Biao Wang ,&nbsp;Zongke Zhou ,&nbsp;Chen Wang ,&nbsp;Kang Li ,&nbsp;Yong Nie","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>OpenCap, a smartphone-based markerless system, offers a cost-effective alternative to traditional marker-based systems for gait analysis. However, its kinematic measurement accuracy must be evaluated before widespread use in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate OpenCap for lower-limb joint angle measurements during walking in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and to compare error metrics between patients and healthy controls. Lower-limb kinematic data were simultaneously collected from 53 patients with knee OA and 30 healthy individuals using OpenCap and a marker-based motion capture system while walking at a self-selected speed. Evaluation was assessed through root mean square error (RMSE) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Two-way repeated measures analyses of variance were employed to evaluate the main effects of and interactions between group (knee OA patients vs. healthy controls) and walking direction (toward vs. away from the camera). The results demonstrated a grand mean RMSE of 6.1° and an ICC of 0.67 for knee OA patients when walking toward the camera. Patients with knee OA exhibited significantly higher RMSE and lower ICC values compared to healthy controls. Additionally, walking toward the camera was associated with significantly lower RMSE and higher ICC values than walking away from the camera. OpenCap’s minimal hardware costs, free software, and user-friendly interface suggest its potential for widespread clinical implementation. The sagittal hip and knee angles demonstrate strong agreement with the marker-based system; however, caution is warranted in clinical decision-making for this population, as errors in most joint angles slightly surpass acceptable thresholds.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 112529"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025000405","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OpenCap, a smartphone-based markerless system, offers a cost-effective alternative to traditional marker-based systems for gait analysis. However, its kinematic measurement accuracy must be evaluated before widespread use in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate OpenCap for lower-limb joint angle measurements during walking in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and to compare error metrics between patients and healthy controls. Lower-limb kinematic data were simultaneously collected from 53 patients with knee OA and 30 healthy individuals using OpenCap and a marker-based motion capture system while walking at a self-selected speed. Evaluation was assessed through root mean square error (RMSE) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Two-way repeated measures analyses of variance were employed to evaluate the main effects of and interactions between group (knee OA patients vs. healthy controls) and walking direction (toward vs. away from the camera). The results demonstrated a grand mean RMSE of 6.1° and an ICC of 0.67 for knee OA patients when walking toward the camera. Patients with knee OA exhibited significantly higher RMSE and lower ICC values compared to healthy controls. Additionally, walking toward the camera was associated with significantly lower RMSE and higher ICC values than walking away from the camera. OpenCap’s minimal hardware costs, free software, and user-friendly interface suggest its potential for widespread clinical implementation. The sagittal hip and knee angles demonstrate strong agreement with the marker-based system; however, caution is warranted in clinical decision-making for this population, as errors in most joint angles slightly surpass acceptable thresholds.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估基于智能手机的无标记系统测量膝关节骨关节炎患者下肢运动学。
OpenCap是一种基于智能手机的无标记系统,它为传统的基于标记的步态分析系统提供了一种经济高效的替代方案。然而,在广泛应用于临床实践之前,必须对其运动学测量精度进行评估。本研究旨在评估OpenCap在膝关节骨关节炎(OA)患者行走时下肢关节角度测量中的应用,并比较患者和健康对照组之间的误差指标。使用OpenCap和基于标记的运动捕捉系统同时收集53名膝关节OA患者和30名健康个体的下肢运动学数据,同时以自行选择的速度行走。通过均方根误差(RMSE)和类内相关系数(ICC)进行评价。采用双向重复测量方差分析来评估组(膝关节OA患者与健康对照组)和行走方向(朝向与远离相机)的主要影响和相互作用。结果显示,膝关节OA患者走向相机时的均方根误差为6.1°,ICC为0.67。与健康对照相比,膝关节OA患者的RMSE显著升高,ICC值显著降低。此外,与远离相机相比,走向相机的RMSE和ICC值显著降低。OpenCap的最低硬件成本、免费软件和用户友好的界面表明其具有广泛临床应用的潜力。髋和膝关节矢状角与基于标记的系统表现出强烈的一致性;然而,由于大多数关节角度的误差略高于可接受的阈值,因此在临床决策时需要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of biomechanics
Journal of biomechanics 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership. Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: -Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells. -Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions. -Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response. -Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing. -Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine. -Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction. -Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules. -Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints. -Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics. -Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.
期刊最新文献
Design of epicardial restraints for optimized passive filling of the right ventricle Concurrent validity of Theia3D markerless compared to marker-based motion capture for movement synergy analysis during the 1-minute sit-to-stand test Datasets for acquiring 3D bone shapes: a systematic review Analysis of head movements during gait in healthy populations and people with neurological disorders: a systematic review Erratum to “Identifying the most prominent transversal gait patterns in children with torsional deformities using cluster analysis” [J. Biomech. 197 (2026) 113194]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1