Junqing Wang , Wei Xu , Zhuoying Wu , Hui Zhang , Biao Wang , Zongke Zhou , Chen Wang , Kang Li , Yong Nie
{"title":"Evaluation of a smartphone-based markerless system to measure lower-limb kinematics in patients with knee osteoarthritis","authors":"Junqing Wang , Wei Xu , Zhuoying Wu , Hui Zhang , Biao Wang , Zongke Zhou , Chen Wang , Kang Li , Yong Nie","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>OpenCap, a smartphone-based markerless system, offers a cost-effective alternative to traditional marker-based systems for gait analysis. However, its kinematic measurement accuracy must be evaluated before widespread use in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate OpenCap for lower-limb joint angle measurements during walking in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and to compare error metrics between patients and healthy controls. Lower-limb kinematic data were simultaneously collected from 53 patients with knee OA and 30 healthy individuals using OpenCap and a marker-based motion capture system while walking at a self-selected speed. Evaluation was assessed through root mean square error (RMSE) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Two-way repeated measures analyses of variance were employed to evaluate the main effects of and interactions between group (knee OA patients vs. healthy controls) and walking direction (toward vs. away from the camera). The results demonstrated a grand mean RMSE of 6.1° and an ICC of 0.67 for knee OA patients when walking toward the camera. Patients with knee OA exhibited significantly higher RMSE and lower ICC values compared to healthy controls. Additionally, walking toward the camera was associated with significantly lower RMSE and higher ICC values than walking away from the camera. OpenCap’s minimal hardware costs, free software, and user-friendly interface suggest its potential for widespread clinical implementation. The sagittal hip and knee angles demonstrate strong agreement with the marker-based system; however, caution is warranted in clinical decision-making for this population, as errors in most joint angles slightly surpass acceptable thresholds.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 112529"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025000405","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
OpenCap, a smartphone-based markerless system, offers a cost-effective alternative to traditional marker-based systems for gait analysis. However, its kinematic measurement accuracy must be evaluated before widespread use in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate OpenCap for lower-limb joint angle measurements during walking in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and to compare error metrics between patients and healthy controls. Lower-limb kinematic data were simultaneously collected from 53 patients with knee OA and 30 healthy individuals using OpenCap and a marker-based motion capture system while walking at a self-selected speed. Evaluation was assessed through root mean square error (RMSE) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Two-way repeated measures analyses of variance were employed to evaluate the main effects of and interactions between group (knee OA patients vs. healthy controls) and walking direction (toward vs. away from the camera). The results demonstrated a grand mean RMSE of 6.1° and an ICC of 0.67 for knee OA patients when walking toward the camera. Patients with knee OA exhibited significantly higher RMSE and lower ICC values compared to healthy controls. Additionally, walking toward the camera was associated with significantly lower RMSE and higher ICC values than walking away from the camera. OpenCap’s minimal hardware costs, free software, and user-friendly interface suggest its potential for widespread clinical implementation. The sagittal hip and knee angles demonstrate strong agreement with the marker-based system; however, caution is warranted in clinical decision-making for this population, as errors in most joint angles slightly surpass acceptable thresholds.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership.
Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to:
-Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells.
-Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions.
-Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response.
-Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing.
-Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine.
-Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction.
-Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules.
-Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints.
-Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics.
-Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.