A mathematical model for derivation of Elevated-Electrode-Placement Electrocardiogram (EEP-ECG) leads from a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of electrocardiology Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2025.153880
Karan Kalani, Raja Selvaraj, Sreekumaran Nair, Santhosh Satheesh, Avinash Anantharaj, Shaheer Ahmed, Suresh Kumar Sukumaran, Anish Bhargav, Sridhar Balaguru
{"title":"A mathematical model for derivation of Elevated-Electrode-Placement Electrocardiogram (EEP-ECG) leads from a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram.","authors":"Karan Kalani, Raja Selvaraj, Sreekumaran Nair, Santhosh Satheesh, Avinash Anantharaj, Shaheer Ahmed, Suresh Kumar Sukumaran, Anish Bhargav, Sridhar Balaguru","doi":"10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2025.153880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Placement of right precordial leads in higher intercostal spaces (EEP-ECG) improves the detection of Brugada Syndrome (BrS). Given the potential difficulty of lead placement and the transient nature of BrS ECG patterns, we developed a model to predict EEP-ECG from a standard 12‑lead ECG.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To create and validate a model that derives EEP-ECG leads from a standard 12‑lead ECG.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recorded 16 channel ECGs (12 standard leads plus 4 elevated leads in the 2nd and 3rd intercostal spaces) using two identical ECG recorders. A linear regression model was developed from the ECG data in the training group. This model was subsequently used to predict EEP-ECG in the validation group. Accuracy of the model was evaluated by comparing the derived leads to the actually recorded leads. Comparison was done using correlation coefficients and visual assessment by two cardiologists on a scale of 1-3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 42 participants (22 in the training group, 20 in the validation group), including 8 BrS patients. The model showed strong correlation (r > 0.85) between actual and predicted leads for 76 of 80 leads. Visual assessment yielded an average score of 2.44 ± 0.68. The model has been made available as an online tool for automatic derivation of EEP-ECG from a standard 12‑lead ECG (http://eep-ecg.in/).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We developed a linear model to derive elevated ECG leads from standard 12‑lead ECGs. The model predicts EEP-ECG with reasonable accuracy. This model can be useful in diagnosing BrS in new or existing ECGs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of electrocardiology","volume":"89 ","pages":"153880"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of electrocardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2025.153880","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Placement of right precordial leads in higher intercostal spaces (EEP-ECG) improves the detection of Brugada Syndrome (BrS). Given the potential difficulty of lead placement and the transient nature of BrS ECG patterns, we developed a model to predict EEP-ECG from a standard 12‑lead ECG.

Objective: To create and validate a model that derives EEP-ECG leads from a standard 12‑lead ECG.

Methods: We recorded 16 channel ECGs (12 standard leads plus 4 elevated leads in the 2nd and 3rd intercostal spaces) using two identical ECG recorders. A linear regression model was developed from the ECG data in the training group. This model was subsequently used to predict EEP-ECG in the validation group. Accuracy of the model was evaluated by comparing the derived leads to the actually recorded leads. Comparison was done using correlation coefficients and visual assessment by two cardiologists on a scale of 1-3.

Results: The study included 42 participants (22 in the training group, 20 in the validation group), including 8 BrS patients. The model showed strong correlation (r > 0.85) between actual and predicted leads for 76 of 80 leads. Visual assessment yielded an average score of 2.44 ± 0.68. The model has been made available as an online tool for automatic derivation of EEP-ECG from a standard 12‑lead ECG (http://eep-ecg.in/).

Conclusion: We developed a linear model to derive elevated ECG leads from standard 12‑lead ECGs. The model predicts EEP-ECG with reasonable accuracy. This model can be useful in diagnosing BrS in new or existing ECGs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of electrocardiology
Journal of electrocardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
152
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Electrocardiology is devoted exclusively to clinical and experimental studies of the electrical activities of the heart. It seeks to contribute significantly to the accuracy of diagnosis and prognosis and the effective treatment, prevention, or delay of heart disease. Editorial contents include electrocardiography, vectorcardiography, arrhythmias, membrane action potential, cardiac pacing, monitoring defibrillation, instrumentation, drug effects, and computer applications.
期刊最新文献
Can artificial intelligence lower the global sudden cardiac death rate? A narrative review. A mathematical model for derivation of Elevated-Electrode-Placement Electrocardiogram (EEP-ECG) leads from a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram. How to correct QT interval after cardiac resynchronisation therapy. Residual-attention deep learning model for atrial fibrillation detection from Holter recordings. Spontaneous resumption of severe infranodal conduction disturbances that followed COVID-19 vaccination.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1