Physical therapy assistance in labor: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101169
Alexandre Delgado , Andrea Lemos , Geyson Marinho , Renato S. Melo , Filipe Pinheiro , Melania Amorim
{"title":"Physical therapy assistance in labor: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Alexandre Delgado ,&nbsp;Andrea Lemos ,&nbsp;Geyson Marinho ,&nbsp;Renato S. Melo ,&nbsp;Filipe Pinheiro ,&nbsp;Melania Amorim","doi":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Physical therapy assistance during labor may provide physical and emotional support to the expectant mother. Through specific techniques, physical therapists may help alleviate pain, improve mobility, and facilitate a safer and more comfortable delivery.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To perform a systematic review of the literature to assess the potential benefits and risks of physical therapy assistance during labor.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A search was conducted in the MEDLINE/PubMed, LILACS, PEDro, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases, with no restrictions on dates or language. The terms \"Physical therapy assistance\" and \"Labor\" were used. Randomized and quasi-randomized clinical trials comparing a group receiving physical therapy assistance during labor with a control group receiving standard care were included. The Cochrane tool (RoB 2.0) was used to assess the Risk of Bias, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE system. Quantitative analysis was performed through meta-analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twelve studies involving 984 pregnant women were included. There was an increase frequency of vaginal deliveries (RR: 1.10, 95% CI 1.04, 1.17; 9 studies; I<sup>2</sup>, 2%; T<sup>2</sup>, 0.00; <em>p</em> = 0.42) and a reduction in cesarean sections (RR: 0.52, 95% CI 0.35, 0.76; 9 studies; I<sup>2</sup>, 0%; T<sup>2</sup>, 0.00; <em>p</em> = 0.65) for the physical therapy group, findings based on high-certainty evidence. There was also a reduction in the duration of the first stage of labor (MD: -99.01 min, 95% CI -153.35, -44.66; 7 studies; I<sup>2</sup>, 88%; T<sup>2</sup>, 4546.40; <em>p</em> = 0.00001), duration of the second stage (MD: – 11.29 min, 95% CI -18.94, -3.64; 6 studies; I<sup>2</sup>, 53%; T<sup>2</sup>, 45.01; <em>p</em> = 0.06) and frequence of perineal lacerations (RR: 0.49, 95% CI 0.25, 0.96; 4 studies; I<sup>2</sup>, 0%; T<sup>2</sup>, 0.00; <em>p</em> = 0.70) for the intervention group, findings based on moderate-certainty evidence. There was also a reduction in pain by 1.46 points on the Visual Analog Scale (MD: -1.46, 95% CI -2.52, -0.41; 7 studies; I<sup>2</sup>, 100%; T<sup>2</sup>, 1.90; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.00001), findings based on low-certainty evidence, a decrease in analgesic use (RR: 0.90, 95% CI 0.83, 0.99; 2 studies; I<sup>2</sup>, 0%; T<sup>2</sup>, 0.00; <em>p</em> = 0.44), and maternal anxiety by 7.65 points on the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (MD: -7.65, 95% CI -11.27, -4.03; 2 studies; I<sup>2</sup>, 88%; T<sup>2</sup>, 5.99; <em>p</em> = 0.005) for the intervention group. There was no difference in the other maternal and fetal outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Physical therapy assistance during labor provides a number of benefits to the mother.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49621,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","volume":"29 2","pages":"Article 101169"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1413355524005781","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Physical therapy assistance during labor may provide physical and emotional support to the expectant mother. Through specific techniques, physical therapists may help alleviate pain, improve mobility, and facilitate a safer and more comfortable delivery.

Objective

To perform a systematic review of the literature to assess the potential benefits and risks of physical therapy assistance during labor.

Methods

A search was conducted in the MEDLINE/PubMed, LILACS, PEDro, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases, with no restrictions on dates or language. The terms "Physical therapy assistance" and "Labor" were used. Randomized and quasi-randomized clinical trials comparing a group receiving physical therapy assistance during labor with a control group receiving standard care were included. The Cochrane tool (RoB 2.0) was used to assess the Risk of Bias, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE system. Quantitative analysis was performed through meta-analyses.

Results

Twelve studies involving 984 pregnant women were included. There was an increase frequency of vaginal deliveries (RR: 1.10, 95% CI 1.04, 1.17; 9 studies; I2, 2%; T2, 0.00; p = 0.42) and a reduction in cesarean sections (RR: 0.52, 95% CI 0.35, 0.76; 9 studies; I2, 0%; T2, 0.00; p = 0.65) for the physical therapy group, findings based on high-certainty evidence. There was also a reduction in the duration of the first stage of labor (MD: -99.01 min, 95% CI -153.35, -44.66; 7 studies; I2, 88%; T2, 4546.40; p = 0.00001), duration of the second stage (MD: – 11.29 min, 95% CI -18.94, -3.64; 6 studies; I2, 53%; T2, 45.01; p = 0.06) and frequence of perineal lacerations (RR: 0.49, 95% CI 0.25, 0.96; 4 studies; I2, 0%; T2, 0.00; p = 0.70) for the intervention group, findings based on moderate-certainty evidence. There was also a reduction in pain by 1.46 points on the Visual Analog Scale (MD: -1.46, 95% CI -2.52, -0.41; 7 studies; I2, 100%; T2, 1.90; p < 0.00001), findings based on low-certainty evidence, a decrease in analgesic use (RR: 0.90, 95% CI 0.83, 0.99; 2 studies; I2, 0%; T2, 0.00; p = 0.44), and maternal anxiety by 7.65 points on the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (MD: -7.65, 95% CI -11.27, -4.03; 2 studies; I2, 88%; T2, 5.99; p = 0.005) for the intervention group. There was no difference in the other maternal and fetal outcomes.

Conclusion

Physical therapy assistance during labor provides a number of benefits to the mother.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
8.80%
发文量
53
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy (BJPT) is the official publication of the Brazilian Society of Physical Therapy Research and Graduate Studies (ABRAPG-Ft). It publishes original research articles on topics related to the areas of physical therapy and rehabilitation sciences, including clinical, basic or applied studies on the assessment, prevention, and treatment of movement disorders.
期刊最新文献
A Brazilian Association of Women´s Health Physical Therapy (ABRAFISM) guideline on the terminology of pelvic floor muscle function and assessment Reply to letter to editor for article: ‘‘Development, reliability, and validity of the mobility assessment scale in hospitalized patients (HMob).’’ Pain revolution in the public health system: Active coping strategies for chronic pain unit Letter to the editor about the article “Development, reliability, and validity of the mobility assessment scale in hospitalized patients (HMob)” Physical therapy assistance in labor: A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1