Constraints to the initiation of home non-invasive ventilation and short-term efficacy in different diagnostic groups (as a prelude to an ambulatory shift).

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Respiratory Medicine and Research Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1016/j.resmer.2025.101154
Claire Drouet, Pascaline Priou, Frédéric Gagnadoux, Wojciech Trzepizur
{"title":"Constraints to the initiation of home non-invasive ventilation and short-term efficacy in different diagnostic groups (as a prelude to an ambulatory shift).","authors":"Claire Drouet, Pascaline Priou, Frédéric Gagnadoux, Wojciech Trzepizur","doi":"10.1016/j.resmer.2025.101154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is the reference treatment for chronic respiratory failure (CRF) due to impairment of the ventilatory system. Home initiation is increasingly practiced. To better support this ambulatory shift, we aimed to assess the implementation constraints and short-term efficacy according to different aetiologies of CRF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study with cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis included patients initiated with NIV at Angers University Hospital. Patients were separated according to the following aetiologies: obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS), chronic obstruction pulmonary disease (COPD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), myopathy and chest wall disease. Implementation constraints were assessed by analysing the variability of NIV settings, the number of masks tried and the duration of hospitalisation. NIV effectiveness was assessed by measuring residual PaCO2 (arterial pressure in CO2), apnoea hypopnea index (AHI<sub>flow</sub>) and tidal volume (V<sub>T</sub>) (as displayed by the NIV software).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between October 2020 and May 2022, 102 patients were started with NIV, including a majority of ALS patients. We found a moderate variability in NIV settings (pressure, slope, triggers, etc.) within the different etiological groups, particularly in ALS. On the other hand, ALS patients required more interface trials than other groups and often had unmet efficacy criteria at hospital discharge. Interestingly, longitudinal follow-up showed a progressive improvement in efficacy criteria, particularly in patients who were initially inadequately ventilated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Each aetiological group has specific constraints in the initiation of NIV that should be considered when initiating NIV in the outpatient setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":48479,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Medicine and Research","volume":"87 ","pages":"101154"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Medicine and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmer.2025.101154","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is the reference treatment for chronic respiratory failure (CRF) due to impairment of the ventilatory system. Home initiation is increasingly practiced. To better support this ambulatory shift, we aimed to assess the implementation constraints and short-term efficacy according to different aetiologies of CRF.

Methods: This retrospective study with cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis included patients initiated with NIV at Angers University Hospital. Patients were separated according to the following aetiologies: obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS), chronic obstruction pulmonary disease (COPD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), myopathy and chest wall disease. Implementation constraints were assessed by analysing the variability of NIV settings, the number of masks tried and the duration of hospitalisation. NIV effectiveness was assessed by measuring residual PaCO2 (arterial pressure in CO2), apnoea hypopnea index (AHIflow) and tidal volume (VT) (as displayed by the NIV software).

Results: Between October 2020 and May 2022, 102 patients were started with NIV, including a majority of ALS patients. We found a moderate variability in NIV settings (pressure, slope, triggers, etc.) within the different etiological groups, particularly in ALS. On the other hand, ALS patients required more interface trials than other groups and often had unmet efficacy criteria at hospital discharge. Interestingly, longitudinal follow-up showed a progressive improvement in efficacy criteria, particularly in patients who were initially inadequately ventilated.

Conclusion: Each aetiological group has specific constraints in the initiation of NIV that should be considered when initiating NIV in the outpatient setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory Medicine and Research
Respiratory Medicine and Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
50 days
期刊最新文献
Role of narrow band imaging in assessing bronchial mucosal hypervascularization in COVID-19 patients. Constraints to the initiation of home non-invasive ventilation and short-term efficacy in different diagnostic groups (as a prelude to an ambulatory shift). Efficacy of convalescent plasma for the treatment of COVID-19 in lung transplant recipients: A multicenter French study. Prognosis of incidental lung cancer in lung transplant candidates. Evaluation of efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with progressive interstitial lung disease (ILD) with inflammatory component (EvER-ILD2): A multicentre double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1