The effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration in treatment of cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis.
Song Xu, Chuanmin Deng, Kaikai Tang, Gang Nian, Zhongran Man, Song Yang, Ming Xu
{"title":"The effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration in treatment of cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis.","authors":"Song Xu, Chuanmin Deng, Kaikai Tang, Gang Nian, Zhongran Man, Song Yang, Ming Xu","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02110-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to compare the efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE), laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE), and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the treatment of gallbladder stones with common bile duct stones. We conducted a retrospective comparative analysis based on surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative recovery metrics, total hospitalization costs, gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI) before and after surgery, and the incidence of postoperative complications. No significant differences were found among the three groups in terms of the surgical success rate, first stone clearance rate, intraoperative blood loss, incidence of postoperative complications, and stone recurrence rate (p > 0.05). The LTCBDE group had shorter surgical time, earlier time to get out of bed, earlier first flatus time, shorter postoperative hospital stays, and earlier removal of abdominal drainage tube compared to the LCBDE and the ERCP + LC groups (all p < 0.05). The average hospitalization cost was also lower in the LTCBDE group (p < 0.05). LTCBDE for the treatment of gallbladder stones with common bile duct stones leads to faster recovery and improved quality of life. It is safe and effective, making it a method worthy of promotion.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02110-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aims to compare the efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE), laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE), and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the treatment of gallbladder stones with common bile duct stones. We conducted a retrospective comparative analysis based on surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative recovery metrics, total hospitalization costs, gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI) before and after surgery, and the incidence of postoperative complications. No significant differences were found among the three groups in terms of the surgical success rate, first stone clearance rate, intraoperative blood loss, incidence of postoperative complications, and stone recurrence rate (p > 0.05). The LTCBDE group had shorter surgical time, earlier time to get out of bed, earlier first flatus time, shorter postoperative hospital stays, and earlier removal of abdominal drainage tube compared to the LCBDE and the ERCP + LC groups (all p < 0.05). The average hospitalization cost was also lower in the LTCBDE group (p < 0.05). LTCBDE for the treatment of gallbladder stones with common bile duct stones leads to faster recovery and improved quality of life. It is safe and effective, making it a method worthy of promotion.
期刊介绍:
Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future.
Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts.
Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.