{"title":"Cost-Effective Day Surgery for Arteriovenous Fistula Stenosis: A Viable Model for Hemodialysis Patients.","authors":"Yi Zeng, Jing Wen, Shen Zhan, Xuyang Hao, Yuzhu Wang, Lihong Zhang","doi":"10.12659/MSM.946128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND For patients with end-stage renal disease, arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are often used for hemodialysis, but stenosis can impair their function. Traditional inpatient procedures to address AVF stenosis are effective but resource-intensive, prompting the need for alternative approaches like day surgery to optimize care and reduce costs. This study evaluated the feasibility of a day surgery model for AVF stenosis treatment in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients, aiming to develop a cost-effective and high-quality care model. MATERIAL AND METHODS A prospective cohort study was conducted with 186 MHD patients undergoing AVF stenosis intervention between July 2022 and May, 2023. Patients were divided into a day surgery group (n=112) and a ward group (n=74). Various preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters were recorded, including AVF patency, complications, and rehospitalization rates. Follow-up assessments were conducted on postoperative days 1, 3, 7, and 30, with long-term patency evaluated at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS The day surgery group achieved a technical success rate of 99.11% and a complication rate of 3.57%, compared to 97.30% and 1.35% in the ward group. The day surgery group also had significantly shorter waiting times for beds, shorter hospital stays, and lower hospitalization costs (P<0.01). No significant differences were found between the groups in preoperative or postoperative parameters. CONCLUSIONS The day surgery model for AVF stenosis intervention in MHD patients is a viable option, showing comparable success and complication rates to inpatient surgery while significantly reducing hospital stays and costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48888,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor","volume":"31 ","pages":"e946128"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.946128","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND For patients with end-stage renal disease, arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are often used for hemodialysis, but stenosis can impair their function. Traditional inpatient procedures to address AVF stenosis are effective but resource-intensive, prompting the need for alternative approaches like day surgery to optimize care and reduce costs. This study evaluated the feasibility of a day surgery model for AVF stenosis treatment in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients, aiming to develop a cost-effective and high-quality care model. MATERIAL AND METHODS A prospective cohort study was conducted with 186 MHD patients undergoing AVF stenosis intervention between July 2022 and May, 2023. Patients were divided into a day surgery group (n=112) and a ward group (n=74). Various preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters were recorded, including AVF patency, complications, and rehospitalization rates. Follow-up assessments were conducted on postoperative days 1, 3, 7, and 30, with long-term patency evaluated at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS The day surgery group achieved a technical success rate of 99.11% and a complication rate of 3.57%, compared to 97.30% and 1.35% in the ward group. The day surgery group also had significantly shorter waiting times for beds, shorter hospital stays, and lower hospitalization costs (P<0.01). No significant differences were found between the groups in preoperative or postoperative parameters. CONCLUSIONS The day surgery model for AVF stenosis intervention in MHD patients is a viable option, showing comparable success and complication rates to inpatient surgery while significantly reducing hospital stays and costs.
期刊介绍:
Medical Science Monitor (MSM) established in 1995 is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal which publishes original articles in Clinical Medicine and related disciplines such as Epidemiology and Population Studies, Product Investigations, Development of Laboratory Techniques :: Diagnostics and Medical Technology which enable presentation of research or review works in overlapping areas of medicine and technology such us (but not limited to): medical diagnostics, medical imaging systems, computer simulation of health and disease processes, new medical devices, etc. Reviews and Special Reports - papers may be accepted on the basis that they provide a systematic, critical and up-to-date overview of literature pertaining to research or clinical topics. Meta-analyses are considered as reviews. A special attention will be paid to a teaching value of a review paper.
Medical Science Monitor is internationally indexed in Thomson-Reuters Web of Science, Journals Citation Report (JCR), Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI), Index Medicus MEDLINE, PubMed, PMC, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Chemical Abstracts CAS and Index Copernicus.