Supporting vision-language model few-shot inference with confounder-pruned knowledge prompt.

IF 6 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Neural Networks Pub Date : 2025-01-18 DOI:10.1016/j.neunet.2025.107173
Jiangmeng Li, Wenyi Mo, Fei Song, Chuxiong Sun, Wenwen Qiang, Bing Su, Changwen Zheng
{"title":"Supporting vision-language model few-shot inference with confounder-pruned knowledge prompt.","authors":"Jiangmeng Li, Wenyi Mo, Fei Song, Chuxiong Sun, Wenwen Qiang, Bing Su, Changwen Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.neunet.2025.107173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vision-language models are pre-trained by aligning image-text pairs in a common space to deal with open-set visual concepts. Recent works adopt fixed or learnable prompts, i.e., classification weights are synthesized from natural language descriptions of task-relevant categories, to reduce the gap between tasks during the pre-training and inference phases. However, how and what prompts can improve inference performance remains unclear. In this paper, we explicitly clarify the importance of incorporating semantic information into prompts, while existing prompting methods generate prompts without sufficiently exploring the semantic information of textual labels. Manually constructing prompts with rich semantics requires domain expertise and is extremely time-consuming. To cope with this issue, we propose a knowledge-aware prompt learning method, namely Confounder-pruned Knowledge Prompt (CPKP), which retrieves an ontology knowledge graph by treating the textual label as a query to extract task-relevant semantic information. CPKP further introduces a double-tier confounder-pruning procedure to refine the derived semantic information. Adhering to the individual causal effect principle, the graph-tier confounders are gradually identified and phased out. The feature-tier confounders are eliminated by following the maximum entropy principle in information theory. Empirically, the evaluations demonstrate the effectiveness of CPKP in few-shot inference, e.g., with only two shots, CPKP outperforms the manual-prompt method by 4.64% and the learnable-prompt method by 1.09% on average.</p>","PeriodicalId":49763,"journal":{"name":"Neural Networks","volume":"185 ","pages":"107173"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neural Networks","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2025.107173","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vision-language models are pre-trained by aligning image-text pairs in a common space to deal with open-set visual concepts. Recent works adopt fixed or learnable prompts, i.e., classification weights are synthesized from natural language descriptions of task-relevant categories, to reduce the gap between tasks during the pre-training and inference phases. However, how and what prompts can improve inference performance remains unclear. In this paper, we explicitly clarify the importance of incorporating semantic information into prompts, while existing prompting methods generate prompts without sufficiently exploring the semantic information of textual labels. Manually constructing prompts with rich semantics requires domain expertise and is extremely time-consuming. To cope with this issue, we propose a knowledge-aware prompt learning method, namely Confounder-pruned Knowledge Prompt (CPKP), which retrieves an ontology knowledge graph by treating the textual label as a query to extract task-relevant semantic information. CPKP further introduces a double-tier confounder-pruning procedure to refine the derived semantic information. Adhering to the individual causal effect principle, the graph-tier confounders are gradually identified and phased out. The feature-tier confounders are eliminated by following the maximum entropy principle in information theory. Empirically, the evaluations demonstrate the effectiveness of CPKP in few-shot inference, e.g., with only two shots, CPKP outperforms the manual-prompt method by 4.64% and the learnable-prompt method by 1.09% on average.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neural Networks
Neural Networks 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
13.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
425
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Neural Networks is a platform that aims to foster an international community of scholars and practitioners interested in neural networks, deep learning, and other approaches to artificial intelligence and machine learning. Our journal invites submissions covering various aspects of neural networks research, from computational neuroscience and cognitive modeling to mathematical analyses and engineering applications. By providing a forum for interdisciplinary discussions between biology and technology, we aim to encourage the development of biologically-inspired artificial intelligence.
期刊最新文献
Estimating global phase synchronization by quantifying multivariate mutual information and detecting network structure. Event-based adaptive fixed-time optimal control for saturated fault-tolerant nonlinear multiagent systems via reinforcement learning algorithm. Lie group convolution neural networks with scale-rotation equivariance. Multi-hop interpretable meta learning for few-shot temporal knowledge graph completion. An object detection-based model for automated screening of stem-cells senescence during drug screening.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1