Camilla Nero MD, PhD, Rita Trozzi MD, Federica Persiani MSc, Simone Rossi MSc, Luca Mastrantoni MD, Simona Duranti MD, Floriana Camarda MD, Ilenia Marino PharmD, Luciano Giacò PhD, Tina Pasciuto EngD, PhD, Maria De Bonis PhD, Martina Rinelli PhD, Emanuele Perrone MD, Flavia Giacomini PharmD, Domenica Lorusso MD, PhD, Alessia Piermattei MSc, Gianfranco Zannoni MD, PhD, Francesco Fanfani MD, PhD, Giovanni Scambia MD, Angelo Minucci PhD
{"title":"POLE mutations in endometrial carcinoma: Clinical and genomic landscape from a large prospective single-center cohort","authors":"Camilla Nero MD, PhD, Rita Trozzi MD, Federica Persiani MSc, Simone Rossi MSc, Luca Mastrantoni MD, Simona Duranti MD, Floriana Camarda MD, Ilenia Marino PharmD, Luciano Giacò PhD, Tina Pasciuto EngD, PhD, Maria De Bonis PhD, Martina Rinelli PhD, Emanuele Perrone MD, Flavia Giacomini PharmD, Domenica Lorusso MD, PhD, Alessia Piermattei MSc, Gianfranco Zannoni MD, PhD, Francesco Fanfani MD, PhD, Giovanni Scambia MD, Angelo Minucci PhD","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>To date, 11 DNA polymerase epsilon (<i>POLE</i>) pathogenic variants have been declared “hotspot” mutations. Patients with endometrial cancer (EC) characterized by <i>POLE</i> hotspot mutations (<i>POLE</i>mut) have exceptional survival outcomes. Whereas international guidelines encourage deescalation of adjuvant treatment in early-stage <i>POLE</i>mut EC, data regarding safety in <i>POLE</i>mut patients with unfavorable characteristics are still under investigation. On the other hand, the spread of comprehensive genome profiling programs has underscored the need to interpret <i>POLE</i> variants not considered to be hotspots.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study provides a comprehensive analysis of 596 sequenced patients with EC. The genomic landscape of <i>POLE</i>mut EC was compared with cases harboring nonhotspot <i>POLE</i> mutations within the exonuclease domain. Additionally, the genomic characteristics of multiple classifiers, as well as those exhibiting unfavorable histopathological and clinical features, were examined.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>No significant genomic differences were observed among patients with <i>POLE</i>mut EC when comparing multiple classifiers to not-multiple classifiers or those with unfavorable clinical features. However, the tumor mutational burden differed in both comparisons, whereas the percentage of C>G mutations only differed in the comparison based on clinical features. Specific <i>POLE</i> mutations, even if not considered to be hotspots, have genomic features comparable to <i>POLE</i>mut.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The present findings confirm the absence of significant genomic differences among <i>POLE</i>mut patients regardless of multiple-classifier status or association with high-risk clinical features. Prognostic data will be essential to elucidate the clinical significance of <i>POLE</i> mutations not classified as hotspots that exhibit genomic characteristics similar to those in <i>POLE</i>mut patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":"131 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11771542/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.35731","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
To date, 11 DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) pathogenic variants have been declared “hotspot” mutations. Patients with endometrial cancer (EC) characterized by POLE hotspot mutations (POLEmut) have exceptional survival outcomes. Whereas international guidelines encourage deescalation of adjuvant treatment in early-stage POLEmut EC, data regarding safety in POLEmut patients with unfavorable characteristics are still under investigation. On the other hand, the spread of comprehensive genome profiling programs has underscored the need to interpret POLE variants not considered to be hotspots.
Methods
This study provides a comprehensive analysis of 596 sequenced patients with EC. The genomic landscape of POLEmut EC was compared with cases harboring nonhotspot POLE mutations within the exonuclease domain. Additionally, the genomic characteristics of multiple classifiers, as well as those exhibiting unfavorable histopathological and clinical features, were examined.
Results
No significant genomic differences were observed among patients with POLEmut EC when comparing multiple classifiers to not-multiple classifiers or those with unfavorable clinical features. However, the tumor mutational burden differed in both comparisons, whereas the percentage of C>G mutations only differed in the comparison based on clinical features. Specific POLE mutations, even if not considered to be hotspots, have genomic features comparable to POLEmut.
Conclusions
The present findings confirm the absence of significant genomic differences among POLEmut patients regardless of multiple-classifier status or association with high-risk clinical features. Prognostic data will be essential to elucidate the clinical significance of POLE mutations not classified as hotspots that exhibit genomic characteristics similar to those in POLEmut patients.
期刊介绍:
The CANCER site is a full-text, electronic implementation of CANCER, an Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, and CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, a Journal of the American Cancer Society.
CANCER publishes interdisciplinary oncologic information according to, but not limited to, the following disease sites and disciplines: blood/bone marrow; breast disease; endocrine disorders; epidemiology; gastrointestinal tract; genitourinary disease; gynecologic oncology; head and neck disease; hepatobiliary tract; integrated medicine; lung disease; medical oncology; neuro-oncology; pathology radiation oncology; translational research