External validation of a multivariable prediction model for positive resection margins in breast-conserving surgery.

IF 1.7 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES BMC Research Notes Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1186/s13104-025-07103-8
Irina Palimaru Manhoobi, Julia Ellbrant, Pär-Ola Bendahl, Søren Redsted, Anne Bodilsen, Trine Tramm, Peer Christiansen, Lisa Rydén
{"title":"External validation of a multivariable prediction model for positive resection margins in breast-conserving surgery.","authors":"Irina Palimaru Manhoobi, Julia Ellbrant, Pär-Ola Bendahl, Søren Redsted, Anne Bodilsen, Trine Tramm, Peer Christiansen, Lisa Rydén","doi":"10.1186/s13104-025-07103-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Positive resection margins after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) most often demands a repeat surgery. To preoperatively identify patients at risk of positive margins, a multivariable model has been developed that predicts positive margins after BCS with a high accuracy. This study aimed to externally validate this prediction model to explore its generalizability and assess if additional preoperatively available variables can further improve its predictive accuracy. The validation cohort included 225 patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent BCS at Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark during 2020-2022. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and calibration analysis were used to validate the prediction model. Univariable logistic regression was used to evaluate if additional variables available in the validation cohort were associated with positive margins and backward elimination to explore if these variables could further improve the model´s predictive accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AUC of the model was 0.60 (95% CI: 0.50-0.70) indicating a lower discriminative capacity in the external cohort. We found weak evidence for an association between increased preoperative breast density on mammography and positive resection margins after BCS (p = 0.027), but the AUC of the model did not improve, when mammographic breast density was included as an additional variable in the model.</p>","PeriodicalId":9234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Research Notes","volume":"18 1","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11770974/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-025-07103-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Positive resection margins after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) most often demands a repeat surgery. To preoperatively identify patients at risk of positive margins, a multivariable model has been developed that predicts positive margins after BCS with a high accuracy. This study aimed to externally validate this prediction model to explore its generalizability and assess if additional preoperatively available variables can further improve its predictive accuracy. The validation cohort included 225 patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent BCS at Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark during 2020-2022. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and calibration analysis were used to validate the prediction model. Univariable logistic regression was used to evaluate if additional variables available in the validation cohort were associated with positive margins and backward elimination to explore if these variables could further improve the model´s predictive accuracy.

Results: The AUC of the model was 0.60 (95% CI: 0.50-0.70) indicating a lower discriminative capacity in the external cohort. We found weak evidence for an association between increased preoperative breast density on mammography and positive resection margins after BCS (p = 0.027), but the AUC of the model did not improve, when mammographic breast density was included as an additional variable in the model.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保乳手术中阳性切缘多变量预测模型的外部验证。
目的:保乳手术(BCS)后的阳性切缘通常需要重复手术。为了在术前识别有阳性切缘风险的患者,我们开发了一个多变量模型,以高精度预测BCS后的阳性切缘。本研究旨在对该预测模型进行外部验证,以探索其普遍性,并评估术前可用的其他变量是否可以进一步提高其预测准确性。验证队列包括225例浸润性乳腺癌患者,这些患者在2020-2022年期间在丹麦奥胡斯大学医院接受了BCS。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)和校正分析对预测模型进行验证。单变量逻辑回归用于评估验证队列中可用的其他变量是否与正边际和反向消除相关,以探索这些变量是否可以进一步提高模型的预测准确性。结果:该模型的AUC为0.60 (95% CI: 0.50-0.70),表明外部队列的判别能力较低。我们发现有微弱的证据表明术前乳房x光检查乳腺密度增加与BCS术后阳性切除切缘之间存在关联(p = 0.027),但当将乳房x光检查乳腺密度作为模型中的附加变量时,模型的AUC并没有改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Research Notes
BMC Research Notes Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
363
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Research Notes publishes scientifically valid research outputs that cannot be considered as full research or methodology articles. We support the research community across all scientific and clinical disciplines by providing an open access forum for sharing data and useful information; this includes, but is not limited to, updates to previous work, additions to established methods, short publications, null results, research proposals and data management plans.
期刊最新文献
Plastid genome of Cerastium davuricum (Caryophyllaceae) from Mongolia. Subtherapeutic exposure in doxorubicin pharmacokinetics among Ugandan breast cancer patients: a pilot study with implications for personalized therapy. Comparison of acetone and sodium phosphotungstic acid precipitation for sample enrichment prior to RT-QuIC for the detection of prion disease. Baseline epigenetic clock measures in the Northern Ireland Cohort for the Longitudinal Study of Ageing (NICOLA). Use of free blood in the stomach to diagnose gastric mucosal lesions prior to endoscopy: the Sanguis-filum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1