Alysson Enes, Camila L Correa, Mauro F Bernardo, Guilherme Nass Salles, Gustavo Oneda, Danilo F Leonel, Steven J Fleck, Stuart M Phillips, Eduardo O De Souza, Tácito P Souza-Junior
{"title":"Does increasing the resistance-training volume lead to greater gains? The effects of weekly set progressions on muscular adaptations in females.","authors":"Alysson Enes, Camila L Correa, Mauro F Bernardo, Guilherme Nass Salles, Gustavo Oneda, Danilo F Leonel, Steven J Fleck, Stuart M Phillips, Eduardo O De Souza, Tácito P Souza-Junior","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2025.2459003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated the effect of increasing the number of sets per week every fortnight versus performing a constant set volume on muscular adaptations over 12 weeks. Thirty females (RT experience 2.1 ± 1.0 years) were randomly assigned to a constant group (CG, <i>n</i> = 9) that performed 22 sets per week, a two-set progression group (2SG, <i>n</i> = 11), or a four-set progression group (4SG, <i>n</i> = 10). Forty-five degree leg press one-repetition maximum (1RM), vastus lateralis cross-sectional area (VL-CSA), and the sum of proximal, middle and distal lateral thigh muscle thickness (∑MT) were assessed at baseline and after the intervention. We observed that the 4SG and 2SG conditions showed greater improvements in 1RM than the CG (<i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>p</i> = 0.032, respectively), with no differences between 4SG and 2SG (<i>p</i> = 0.118). Regarding VL-CSA, the 4SG group showed greater increases than the CG (<i>p</i> = 0.029) but not than the 2SG (<i>p</i> = 0.263), whereas no differences between the 2SG and CG (<i>p</i> = 0.443) were observed. There were no differences between groups for ∑MT (<i>p</i> = 0.783). While all groups demonstrated improvements in the measured outcomes, our findings suggest that increasing weekly sets may offer additional benefits for 1RM and vastus lateralis cross-sectional area. However, no additional benefits were observed for ∑MT.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2459003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We investigated the effect of increasing the number of sets per week every fortnight versus performing a constant set volume on muscular adaptations over 12 weeks. Thirty females (RT experience 2.1 ± 1.0 years) were randomly assigned to a constant group (CG, n = 9) that performed 22 sets per week, a two-set progression group (2SG, n = 11), or a four-set progression group (4SG, n = 10). Forty-five degree leg press one-repetition maximum (1RM), vastus lateralis cross-sectional area (VL-CSA), and the sum of proximal, middle and distal lateral thigh muscle thickness (∑MT) were assessed at baseline and after the intervention. We observed that the 4SG and 2SG conditions showed greater improvements in 1RM than the CG (p < 0.001, p = 0.032, respectively), with no differences between 4SG and 2SG (p = 0.118). Regarding VL-CSA, the 4SG group showed greater increases than the CG (p = 0.029) but not than the 2SG (p = 0.263), whereas no differences between the 2SG and CG (p = 0.443) were observed. There were no differences between groups for ∑MT (p = 0.783). While all groups demonstrated improvements in the measured outcomes, our findings suggest that increasing weekly sets may offer additional benefits for 1RM and vastus lateralis cross-sectional area. However, no additional benefits were observed for ∑MT.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives.
The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.