Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Escalation to Weekly Adalimumab for Chronic Non-Infectious Uveitis: A Multicenter Study Involving Pediatric and Adult Patients.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ocular Immunology and Inflammation Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1080/09273948.2025.2456637
Murat Oklar, Merve İnanç Tekin, Kübra Özdemir Yalçınsoy, Nilüfer Zorlutuna Kaymak, Burak Tanyildiz, Pınar Çakar Özdal
{"title":"Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Escalation to Weekly Adalimumab for Chronic Non-Infectious Uveitis: A Multicenter Study Involving Pediatric and Adult Patients.","authors":"Murat Oklar, Merve İnanç Tekin, Kübra Özdemir Yalçınsoy, Nilüfer Zorlutuna Kaymak, Burak Tanyildiz, Pınar Çakar Özdal","doi":"10.1080/09273948.2025.2456637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of weekly adalimumab (ADA) treatment in non-infectious uveitis (NIU) patients, including both pediatric and adult populations, and identify factors influencing treatment efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study at two hospitals in Türkiye included 51 NIU patients (29 children, 22 adults) who escalated from bi-weekly to weekly ADA due to inadequate disease control. Data on six clinical parameters (anterior chamber reaction, vitreous haze, visual acuity, central macular thickness [CMT], prednisone use, uveitis flare-up frequency), adverse effects, and treatment-related factors were collected. Statistical analyses involved non-parametric tests and regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Weekly ADA led to clinical improvement in 88.2% of patients, with uveitis control achieved in 76.4% by the 6th month. Escalation to weekly dosing significantly improved all clinical parameters compared to the 6-month period before ADA initiation (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Patients on combined weekly ADA and DMARD therapy experienced fewer uveitis attacks (B = - 2.272, 95% CI = [-4.289, -0.254], <i>p</i> = 0.028). Starting ADA as first-line treatment reduced uveitis attacks (<i>p</i> = 0.002) and increased the likelihood of inactive uveitis (OR = 10.349, 95% CI = [1.379, 77.687], <i>p</i> = 0.023). Patients resistant to multiple biologics had worse preADA visual acuity (<i>p</i> = 0.011).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Weekly ADA is effective and safe for controlling NIU when bi-weekly dosing is insufficient. Combining ADA with DMARDs enhances outcomes and reduce uveitis attacks. Poor preADA visual acuity may suggest resistance to biologics. Prospective studies should validate these findings, explore anti-ADA antibody development, and assess how DMARD addition affects immunological parameters and treatment efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19406,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","volume":" ","pages":"367-376"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2025.2456637","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of weekly adalimumab (ADA) treatment in non-infectious uveitis (NIU) patients, including both pediatric and adult populations, and identify factors influencing treatment efficacy.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study at two hospitals in Türkiye included 51 NIU patients (29 children, 22 adults) who escalated from bi-weekly to weekly ADA due to inadequate disease control. Data on six clinical parameters (anterior chamber reaction, vitreous haze, visual acuity, central macular thickness [CMT], prednisone use, uveitis flare-up frequency), adverse effects, and treatment-related factors were collected. Statistical analyses involved non-parametric tests and regression models.

Results: Weekly ADA led to clinical improvement in 88.2% of patients, with uveitis control achieved in 76.4% by the 6th month. Escalation to weekly dosing significantly improved all clinical parameters compared to the 6-month period before ADA initiation (p < 0.001). Patients on combined weekly ADA and DMARD therapy experienced fewer uveitis attacks (B = - 2.272, 95% CI = [-4.289, -0.254], p = 0.028). Starting ADA as first-line treatment reduced uveitis attacks (p = 0.002) and increased the likelihood of inactive uveitis (OR = 10.349, 95% CI = [1.379, 77.687], p = 0.023). Patients resistant to multiple biologics had worse preADA visual acuity (p = 0.011).

Conclusion: Weekly ADA is effective and safe for controlling NIU when bi-weekly dosing is insufficient. Combining ADA with DMARDs enhances outcomes and reduce uveitis attacks. Poor preADA visual acuity may suggest resistance to biologics. Prospective studies should validate these findings, explore anti-ADA antibody development, and assess how DMARD addition affects immunological parameters and treatment efficacy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿达木单抗治疗慢性非感染性葡萄膜炎的实际疗效和安全性:一项涉及儿童和成人患者的多中心研究
目的:评价每周一次阿达木单抗(ADA)治疗非感染性葡萄膜炎(NIU)患者的疗效和安全性,包括儿童和成人人群,并确定影响治疗疗效的因素。方法:在日本两家医院进行回顾性队列研究,纳入51例因疾病控制不充分而从双周ADA升级为每周一次ADA的NIU患者(29名儿童,22名成人)。收集6项临床参数(前房反应、玻璃体浑浊、视力、中央黄斑厚度[CMT]、强的松使用、葡萄膜炎发作频率)、不良反应和治疗相关因素的数据。统计分析包括非参数检验和回归模型。结果:88.2%的患者每周进行ADA治疗后临床改善,到第6个月,76.4%的患者实现了葡萄膜炎的控制。与ADA开始前的6个月相比,每周一次给药显著改善了所有临床参数(p p = 0.028)。将ADA作为一线治疗可减少葡萄膜炎发作(p = 0.002),增加非活动性葡萄膜炎发生的可能性(OR = 10.349, 95% CI = [1.379, 77.687], p = 0.023)。对多种生物制剂耐药的患者在ada前的视力较差(p = 0.011)。结论:在双周剂量不足的情况下,每周一次ADA治疗是有效且安全的。ADA联合DMARDs可提高治疗效果,减少葡萄膜炎发作。ada前视力差可能提示对生物制剂有耐药性。前瞻性研究应验证这些发现,探索抗ada抗体的发展,并评估DMARD添加如何影响免疫参数和治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
15.20%
发文量
285
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ocular Immunology & Inflammation ranks 18 out of 59 in the Ophthalmology Category.Ocular Immunology and Inflammation is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and vision scientists. Published bimonthly, the journal provides an international medium for basic and clinical research reports on the ocular inflammatory response and its control by the immune system. The journal publishes original research papers, case reports, reviews, letters to the editor, meeting abstracts, and invited editorials.
期刊最新文献
Disseminated Tuberculosis Complicated by Choroidal Tuberculoma and Exudative Retinal Detachment: A Case Report. Non-Neoplastic Uveitis Masquerade Syndromes: Insights from a Case Series. Multimodal Imaging Enhanced by Indocyanine Green Angiography in Syphilitic Uveitis. Acute Outer Retinopathy Revealing Metastatic Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma: An Atypical Paraneoplastic Retinopathy within the Inflammatory Spectrum. Letter to the Editor: Comment on Upadhyaya et al.'s "Intravitreal Clindamycin as an Adjuvant Therapy in Congenital Toxoplasma Retinochoroiditis in a Neonate - A Case Report".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1