Receipt of humanitarian cash transfers, household food insecurity and the subjective wellbeing of Syrian refugee youth in Jordan.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Public Health Nutrition Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1017/S1368980024002660
Maia Sieverding, Zeina Jamaluddine
{"title":"Receipt of humanitarian cash transfers, household food insecurity and the subjective wellbeing of Syrian refugee youth in Jordan.","authors":"Maia Sieverding, Zeina Jamaluddine","doi":"10.1017/S1368980024002660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Humanitarian aid, including food aid, has increasingly shifted towards the provision of cash assistance over in-kind benefits. This paper examines whether food security mediates the relationship between receipt of humanitarian cash transfers and subjective wellbeing among Syrian refugee youth in Jordan.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary analysis of the 2020-21 Survey of Young People in Jordan, which is nationally representative of Syrian youth aged 16-30. We employ stepwise model building and structural equation models.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Jordan.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Syrian refugee youth aged 16-30 (<i>n</i> 1572).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While 92 % of Syrian households with youth received cash transfers from a UN agency, 78 % of households were food insecure using the Food Insecurity Experience Scale. Fifty-one percent of youth suffered from poor wellbeing using the WHO-5 subjective wellbeing scale. Household food insecurity was associated with poorer youth wellbeing. Receiving larger cash transfer amounts was associated with better wellbeing among Syrian youth in unadjusted models. The relationship between receipt of cash transfers and youth wellbeing was not mediated by food security.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We do not find support for the hypothesis that food security is a mediator of the association between cash transfers and subjective wellbeing for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":20951,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Nutrition","volume":"28 1","pages":"e25"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11822618/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980024002660","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Humanitarian aid, including food aid, has increasingly shifted towards the provision of cash assistance over in-kind benefits. This paper examines whether food security mediates the relationship between receipt of humanitarian cash transfers and subjective wellbeing among Syrian refugee youth in Jordan.

Design: Secondary analysis of the 2020-21 Survey of Young People in Jordan, which is nationally representative of Syrian youth aged 16-30. We employ stepwise model building and structural equation models.

Setting: Jordan.

Participants: Syrian refugee youth aged 16-30 (n 1572).

Results: While 92 % of Syrian households with youth received cash transfers from a UN agency, 78 % of households were food insecure using the Food Insecurity Experience Scale. Fifty-one percent of youth suffered from poor wellbeing using the WHO-5 subjective wellbeing scale. Household food insecurity was associated with poorer youth wellbeing. Receiving larger cash transfer amounts was associated with better wellbeing among Syrian youth in unadjusted models. The relationship between receipt of cash transfers and youth wellbeing was not mediated by food security.

Conclusion: We do not find support for the hypothesis that food security is a mediator of the association between cash transfers and subjective wellbeing for this population.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
约旦境内叙利亚难民青年接受人道主义现金转移、家庭粮食不安全和主观幸福感。
目标:人道主义援助,包括粮食援助,越来越多地转向提供现金援助,而不是实物福利。本文考察了粮食安全是否介导了约旦叙利亚难民青年接受人道主义现金转移与主观幸福感之间的关系。设计:对约旦2020-21年青年调查进行二次分析,该调查是叙利亚16-30岁青年的全国代表。我们采用逐步建立模型和结构方程模型。设置:乔丹。参与者:16-30岁的叙利亚难民青年(1572年)。结果:虽然92%的叙利亚青年家庭从联合国机构获得现金转移,但根据粮食不安全体验量表,78%的家庭处于粮食不安全状态。按照世卫组织5级主观幸福感量表,51%的年轻人的幸福感较差。家庭粮食不安全与较差的青年幸福感有关。在未经调整的模型中,接受更多的现金转移与叙利亚青年更好的幸福感有关。收到现金转移支付与青年福利之间的关系不受粮食安全的调节。结论:我们没有发现支持粮食安全是现金转移与这一人群主观幸福感之间关联的中介的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health Nutrition
Public Health Nutrition 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
521
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Public Health Nutrition provides an international peer-reviewed forum for the publication and dissemination of research and scholarship aimed at understanding the causes of, and approaches and solutions to nutrition-related public health achievements, situations and problems around the world. The journal publishes original and commissioned articles, commentaries and discussion papers for debate. The journal is of interest to epidemiologists and health promotion specialists interested in the role of nutrition in disease prevention; academics and those involved in fieldwork and the application of research to identify practical solutions to important public health problems.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of construct validity and reliability of the Canadian Ultra-Processed Product Screener (CUPS). Socioecological factors influencing maternal and child nutrition: An exploratory qualitative study in semi-urban communities in Ogun State, Nigeria. Türkiye's Position in Socioeconomic Inequalities in Adult Obesity: A Gender-specific and Regional Assessment. Do sustainable diets take food processing into account? A scoping review. Eat UP: A precise, science-based, value-aware, translatable diet quality metric for public health nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1