Relationship Between Quadriceps Strength at 6 Months Postoperatively and Improvement in Patient-Reported Knee Function After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671241305623
Tomoya Ishida, Makoto Suzuki, Hisashi Matsumoto, Mina Samukawa, Satoru Kaneko, Chiharu Inoue, Yoshimitsu Aoki, Harukazu Tohyama
{"title":"Relationship Between Quadriceps Strength at 6 Months Postoperatively and Improvement in Patient-Reported Knee Function After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.","authors":"Tomoya Ishida, Makoto Suzuki, Hisashi Matsumoto, Mina Samukawa, Satoru Kaneko, Chiharu Inoue, Yoshimitsu Aoki, Harukazu Tohyama","doi":"10.1177/23259671241305623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding the factors associated with poor recovery over time after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) helps clinicians identify patients who are at risk and targets for an intervention.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the factors associated with improvement in subjective knee function from 6 to 12 months after ACLR.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 91 patients undergoing primary unilateral ACLR were included. Subjective knee function was assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF) at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Isokinetic knee strength (quadriceps and hamstring) and Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) scale scores were also assessed. Patients were included in the poor recovery group if their improvement in the IKDC-SKF score from 6 to 12 months was <15.5 points (minimal detectable change) and their IKDC-SKF score at 12 months was <90 points (maximum, 100 points). The IKDC-SKF score, knee strength, and the ACL-RSI score were compared between the poor recovery and good recovery groups with and without propensity score matching. Matched variables included age, sex, and IKDC-SKF score at 6 months after ACLR. In addition, logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors that discriminated between the poor recovery and good recovery groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 32 participants (35%) allocated to the poor recovery group. Before propensity score matching, the poor recovery group had a significantly older age, lower IKDC-SKF scores at 6 and 12 months, and a lower limb symmetry index (LSI) for quadriceps strength at 6 months. After propensity score matching, the LSI for quadriceps strength at 6 months was significantly different between the poor recovery and good recovery groups (73.0 ± 17.4 vs 83.3 ± 18.2, respectively; <i>P</i> = .039). Logistic regression analysis showed that a lower LSI for quadriceps strength at 6 months was significantly associated with poor recovery of the IKDC-SKF score (odds ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.93-0.98]), and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified 80.9% as a cutoff value of the LSI for quadriceps strength with 75.0% sensitivity and 61.0% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A lower LSI for quadriceps strength at 6 months postoperatively was associated with poor recovery of the IKDC-SKF score from 6 to 12 months after ACLR, even after adjusting for confounders.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":"23259671241305623"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11760129/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241305623","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Understanding the factors associated with poor recovery over time after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) helps clinicians identify patients who are at risk and targets for an intervention.

Purpose: To determine the factors associated with improvement in subjective knee function from 6 to 12 months after ACLR.

Study design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: A total of 91 patients undergoing primary unilateral ACLR were included. Subjective knee function was assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF) at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Isokinetic knee strength (quadriceps and hamstring) and Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) scale scores were also assessed. Patients were included in the poor recovery group if their improvement in the IKDC-SKF score from 6 to 12 months was <15.5 points (minimal detectable change) and their IKDC-SKF score at 12 months was <90 points (maximum, 100 points). The IKDC-SKF score, knee strength, and the ACL-RSI score were compared between the poor recovery and good recovery groups with and without propensity score matching. Matched variables included age, sex, and IKDC-SKF score at 6 months after ACLR. In addition, logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors that discriminated between the poor recovery and good recovery groups.

Results: There were 32 participants (35%) allocated to the poor recovery group. Before propensity score matching, the poor recovery group had a significantly older age, lower IKDC-SKF scores at 6 and 12 months, and a lower limb symmetry index (LSI) for quadriceps strength at 6 months. After propensity score matching, the LSI for quadriceps strength at 6 months was significantly different between the poor recovery and good recovery groups (73.0 ± 17.4 vs 83.3 ± 18.2, respectively; P = .039). Logistic regression analysis showed that a lower LSI for quadriceps strength at 6 months was significantly associated with poor recovery of the IKDC-SKF score (odds ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.93-0.98]), and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified 80.9% as a cutoff value of the LSI for quadriceps strength with 75.0% sensitivity and 61.0% specificity.

Conclusion: A lower LSI for quadriceps strength at 6 months postoperatively was associated with poor recovery of the IKDC-SKF score from 6 to 12 months after ACLR, even after adjusting for confounders.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:目的:确定前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)后 6 至 12 个月膝关节主观功能改善的相关因素:研究设计:病例对照研究;证据等级,3:方法:共纳入91名接受原发性单侧前交叉韧带置换术的患者。在术后6个月和12个月时使用国际膝关节文献委员会主观膝关节表格(IKDC-SKF)评估主观膝关节功能。此外,还评估了等速膝关节力量(股四头肌和腿肌)和前交叉韧带-伤后恢复运动(ACL-RSI)量表评分。如果患者在 6 至 12 个月期间的 IKDC-SKF 评分改善结果为 "恢复不良",则将其纳入 "恢复不良 "组:有 32 名参与者(35%)被分配到恢复不良组。在倾向得分匹配前,恢复不良组患者的年龄明显偏大,6个月和12个月时的IKDC-SKF得分较低,6个月时的股四头肌力量的肢体对称性指数(LSI)较低。经过倾向得分匹配后,恢复不良组和恢复良好组在 6 个月时的股四头肌力量 LSI 有显著差异(分别为 73.0 ± 17.4 vs 83.3 ± 18.2;P = .039)。逻辑回归分析表明,6个月时股四头肌力量的LSI值越低,IKDC-SKF评分的恢复情况越差(几率为0.96 [95% CI, 0.93-0.98]),接收器操作特征曲线分析确定80.9%为股四头肌力量LSI的临界值,敏感性为75.0%,特异性为61.0%:结论:即使调整了混杂因素,术后6个月股四头肌力量LSI值越低,IKDC-SKF评分在前交叉韧带置换术后6至12个月的恢复情况越差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Association Between Autograft Choice and Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport After ACL Reconstruction. Evaluating the Mechanical Axis for Detection of Posterior Tibial Slope Malalignment in ACL-Deficient Knees on Lateral Radiographs. Evaluation of Thigh Muscle Strength in Adolescent Patients After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis or Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction. Relationship Between Quadriceps Strength at 6 Months Postoperatively and Improvement in Patient-Reported Knee Function After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Association of Preoperative Cartilage T1ρ Values With Progression of Knee Osteoarthritis 10 Years After Anatomical Double-Bundle ACL Reconstruction: Follow-up of a Previous Prospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1