Low-dose perineural dexamethasone in supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks: Optimising postoperative analgesia.

Ahmad Bani Salameh, Jawad F Khasawneh, Ghaith M Kreeshan, Ala A Alzrigat, Sleiman Sharadgah, Suhaib K Werikat, Asem Abdalrahim, Abdullah Alkhawaldeh, Mohammed ALBashtawy, Mohammad Suliman, Yahya H Al-Rshoud
{"title":"Low-dose perineural dexamethasone in supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks: Optimising postoperative analgesia.","authors":"Ahmad Bani Salameh, Jawad F Khasawneh, Ghaith M Kreeshan, Ala A Alzrigat, Sleiman Sharadgah, Suhaib K Werikat, Asem Abdalrahim, Abdullah Alkhawaldeh, Mohammed ALBashtawy, Mohammad Suliman, Yahya H Al-Rshoud","doi":"10.1177/17504589251322150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Orthopaedic procedures often cause intense postoperative pain, posing challenges for effective management. Brachial plexus blocks offer relief but optimising analgesia with minimal local anaesthetic is still challenging. Perineural dexamethasone, with anti-inflammatory effects, shows promise in lower doses but lacks sufficient research.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aims to assess low-dose perineural dexamethasone in ultrasonography-guided brachial plexus blocks for extending analgesia and reducing opioid use in upper limb surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Double-blinded trial on 90 American Society of Anaesthesiologists class I or II patients undergoing upper limb procedures. The patients were divided into two groups and received bupivacaine with either 4 mg dexamethasone (Group D) or saline (Group C). Analgesia duration was evaluated via the Numerical Pain Rating Scale and adverse events were recorded.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The dexamethasone group showed significantly longer analgesia (1253.33 ± 41.00 vs. 714.67 ± 32.80 min, p < 0.001) and lower Numerical Pain Rating Scale scores at 4, 8, 12, and 24 h postoperatively. Minimal adverse events were observed in both groups, with mild nausea being the only event reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In upper limb procedures, low-dose perineural dexamethasone improves postoperative pain management with few side effects. It presents a viable adjunct for enhancing pain management techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":35481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of perioperative practice","volume":" ","pages":"17504589251322150"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of perioperative practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17504589251322150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Orthopaedic procedures often cause intense postoperative pain, posing challenges for effective management. Brachial plexus blocks offer relief but optimising analgesia with minimal local anaesthetic is still challenging. Perineural dexamethasone, with anti-inflammatory effects, shows promise in lower doses but lacks sufficient research.

Objective: The study aims to assess low-dose perineural dexamethasone in ultrasonography-guided brachial plexus blocks for extending analgesia and reducing opioid use in upper limb surgeries.

Methods: Double-blinded trial on 90 American Society of Anaesthesiologists class I or II patients undergoing upper limb procedures. The patients were divided into two groups and received bupivacaine with either 4 mg dexamethasone (Group D) or saline (Group C). Analgesia duration was evaluated via the Numerical Pain Rating Scale and adverse events were recorded.

Findings: The dexamethasone group showed significantly longer analgesia (1253.33 ± 41.00 vs. 714.67 ± 32.80 min, p < 0.001) and lower Numerical Pain Rating Scale scores at 4, 8, 12, and 24 h postoperatively. Minimal adverse events were observed in both groups, with mild nausea being the only event reported.

Conclusions: In upper limb procedures, low-dose perineural dexamethasone improves postoperative pain management with few side effects. It presents a viable adjunct for enhancing pain management techniques.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
锁骨上臂丛阻滞低剂量神经周地塞米松:优化术后镇痛。
背景:骨科手术经常引起强烈的术后疼痛,对有效管理提出了挑战。臂丛阻滞可以缓解疼痛,但用最小的局部麻醉优化镇痛仍然具有挑战性。具有抗炎作用的神经周围地塞米松在低剂量下显示出前景,但缺乏充分的研究。目的:探讨超声引导下臂丛阻滞中低剂量神经周地塞米松对上肢手术中延长镇痛和减少阿片类药物使用的作用。方法:对90例接受上肢手术的美国麻醉师学会I级或II级患者进行双盲试验。将患者分为两组,分别给予布比卡因和4 mg地塞米松(D组)或生理盐水(C组)。通过数值疼痛评定量表评估镇痛时间并记录不良事件。结果:地塞米松组镇痛时间明显延长(1253.33±41.00分钟vs 714.67±32.80分钟)。结论:在上肢手术中,低剂量神经周围地塞米松改善了术后疼痛管理,且副作用少。它提出了一个可行的辅助,以加强疼痛管理技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of perioperative practice
Journal of perioperative practice Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perioperative Practice (JPP) is the official journal of the Association for Perioperative Practice (AfPP). It is an international, peer reviewed journal with a multidisciplinary ethos across all aspects of perioperative care. The overall aim of the journal is to improve patient safety through informing and developing practice. It is an informative professional journal which provides current evidence-based practice, clinical, management and educational developments for practitioners working in the perioperative environment. The journal promotes perioperative practice by publishing clinical research-based articles, literature reviews, topical discussions, advice on clinical issues, current news items and product information.
期刊最新文献
Nurse education on sedation management in ECMO: A small-group training approach. Perioperative anaesthetic management of a massive solitary fibrous tumour of the pleura: A case report. Beneath the surface: A historical exploration of trepanation practices across cultures and eras. Perioperative surveillance of myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery in patients with hip fracture: A retrospective cohort study. Appropriate tourniquet use in surgery: A literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1