Patient–Provider Prenatal Nutrition Conversations Using a Human Factors Approach

Katherine Erbe, Elizabeth Lerner Papautsky, Kylea Liese, Chang Park, Julienne Rutherford, Lisa Tussing-Humphreys, Yanqiao Li, Arissara Sawatpanich, Mary Dawn Koenig
{"title":"Patient–Provider Prenatal Nutrition Conversations Using a Human Factors Approach","authors":"Katherine Erbe,&nbsp;Elizabeth Lerner Papautsky,&nbsp;Kylea Liese,&nbsp;Chang Park,&nbsp;Julienne Rutherford,&nbsp;Lisa Tussing-Humphreys,&nbsp;Yanqiao Li,&nbsp;Arissara Sawatpanich,&nbsp;Mary Dawn Koenig","doi":"10.1016/j.jogn.2025.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To examine patient-provider nutrition conversations at initial prenatal visits.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Convergent mixed methods observational study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Two large metropolitan clinics in the midwestern United States.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Sixteen providers and 20 racially diverse pregnant women.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Guided by the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) 2.0 model, we observed and audio-recorded initial prenatal visits with obstetric providers. Patients completed post-visit surveys and interviews, and providers completed post-visit interviews. Finally, we sent a practice-wide electronic survey to all providers. We completed quantitative data analysis for descriptive statistics of observation and survey results. We completed qualitative thematic analysis of visit and interview transcripts and combined and categorized results into components of the SEIPS 2.0 model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified multiple dynamic and interacting factors relevant to the work system and processes in the SEIPS 2.0 model in patient–provider conversations about nutrition. Although nutrition was covered in all visits, most conversations were provider-centered and covered basic, general recommendations related to a limited number of topics. Few individualized collaborative discussions that addressed contextual factors occurred.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Finding ways to incorporate and address contextual factors into patient-centered conversations about nutrition is vital to optimize the dietary habits of women, especially those from vulnerable populations. To do this, multidisciplinary teams that include nurse practitioners, nurses, obstetricians, and registered dietitians who can address the multiple social determinants of health that affect dietary choices are needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54903,"journal":{"name":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","volume":"54 3","pages":"Pages 298-310"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088421752500005X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To examine patient-provider nutrition conversations at initial prenatal visits.

Design

Convergent mixed methods observational study.

Setting

Two large metropolitan clinics in the midwestern United States.

Participants

Sixteen providers and 20 racially diverse pregnant women.

Methods

Guided by the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) 2.0 model, we observed and audio-recorded initial prenatal visits with obstetric providers. Patients completed post-visit surveys and interviews, and providers completed post-visit interviews. Finally, we sent a practice-wide electronic survey to all providers. We completed quantitative data analysis for descriptive statistics of observation and survey results. We completed qualitative thematic analysis of visit and interview transcripts and combined and categorized results into components of the SEIPS 2.0 model.

Results

We identified multiple dynamic and interacting factors relevant to the work system and processes in the SEIPS 2.0 model in patient–provider conversations about nutrition. Although nutrition was covered in all visits, most conversations were provider-centered and covered basic, general recommendations related to a limited number of topics. Few individualized collaborative discussions that addressed contextual factors occurred.

Conclusion

Finding ways to incorporate and address contextual factors into patient-centered conversations about nutrition is vital to optimize the dietary habits of women, especially those from vulnerable populations. To do this, multidisciplinary teams that include nurse practitioners, nurses, obstetricians, and registered dietitians who can address the multiple social determinants of health that affect dietary choices are needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用人为因素方法的患者-提供者产前营养对话。
目的:探讨患者与提供者在初次产前访视时的营养对话。设计:收敛混合方法观察性研究。地点:美国中西部的两个大城市诊所。参与者:16名提供者和20名不同种族的孕妇。方法:在患者安全系统工程倡议(SEIPS) 2.0模型的指导下,我们观察并录音了产科提供者的初次产前访问。患者完成了随访调查和访谈,提供者完成了随访访谈。最后,我们向所有供应商发送了一份全行业的电子调查。完成定量数据分析,对观察和调查结果进行描述性统计。我们完成了访问和访谈记录的定性专题分析,并将结果合并并分类为SEIPS 2.0模型的组成部分。结果:我们确定了与SEIPS 2.0模型中有关营养的工作系统和流程相关的多个动态和相互作用因素。虽然所有访问都涉及营养问题,但大多数对话都以提供者为中心,并涉及与有限主题有关的基本一般性建议。很少发生针对情境因素的个性化协作讨论。结论:寻找方法将环境因素纳入以患者为中心的营养对话中,对于优化女性,特别是弱势群体的女性的饮食习惯至关重要。为此,需要包括执业护士、护士、产科医生和注册营养师在内的多学科团队,他们可以解决影响饮食选择的多种健康社会决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: JOGNN is a premier resource for health care professionals committed to clinical scholarship that advances the health care of women and newborns. With a focus on nursing practice, JOGNN addresses the latest research, practice issues, policies, opinions, and trends in the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns. This peer-reviewed scientific and technical journal is highly respected for groundbreaking articles on important - and sometimes controversial - issues. Articles published in JOGNN emphasize research evidence and clinical practice, building both science and clinical applications. JOGNN seeks clinical, policy and research manuscripts on the evidence supporting current best practice as well as developing or emerging practice trends. A balance of quantitative and qualitative research with an emphasis on biobehavioral outcome studies and intervention trials is desired. Manuscripts are welcomed on all subjects focused on the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns.
期刊最新文献
Management of Birth With the Fetus in the Occiput Posterior Position by Midwives in Sweden. Perspectives of Nurses and Midwives Regarding Factors That Contribute to and Protect Women From Disrespect and Abuse During Labor. One Woman's Experience of Skin-to-Skin Care With Her Extremely-Low-Birth-Weight Neonate. Citation Integrity and the Responsible Use of References in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Federal Policy Changes Endanger Medicaid's Critical Role in Perinatal Care and Health Equity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1