Risk stratification for violent behavior in critically ill patients: Current assessment tools

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING Intensive and Critical Care Nursing Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1016/j.iccn.2025.103957
Sebastian Berger , Simon A. Amacher , Martin Lohri , Sabina Hunziker , Caroline E. Gebhard , Anja Frei , Raoul Sutter
{"title":"Risk stratification for violent behavior in critically ill patients: Current assessment tools","authors":"Sebastian Berger ,&nbsp;Simon A. Amacher ,&nbsp;Martin Lohri ,&nbsp;Sabina Hunziker ,&nbsp;Caroline E. Gebhard ,&nbsp;Anja Frei ,&nbsp;Raoul Sutter","doi":"10.1016/j.iccn.2025.103957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Workplace violence (WPV) presents challenges in intensive care units (ICUs) calling for reliable prediction of violence. This narrative review aimed to identify and evaluate risk assessment tools from acute care settings which are or might be used to predict violent behavior in adult ICU patients focusing on their performance and clinical utility.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A screening of PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar was conducted to identify risk scores used in the acute care setting such as emergency departments, hospitals and ICUs. Risk factors, predictive validity of scores and their relevance to the ICU setting were evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>24 studies were included. Two studies reported the use in general ICU populations, while eight studies were conducted in psychiatric ICUs and 14 studies implemented the use of risk tools in emergency departments or general wards. Ten risk scores were identified using 30 different variables. Those could be categorized into patient demographics, behavior, history of violence, mental status and other items such as sleep disturbances. The Broset Violence Checklist (BVC) was the most commonly used risk score. It showed moderate predictive accuracy in psychiatric settings including psychiatric ICUs, but limited validation for general ICUs. The overall evidence level was low with serious risk of bias. Other tools demonstrated varying sensitivity and specificity but lacked validation in ICUs.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for clinical practice</h3><div>ICU nurses and physicians are often subjected to violence. There is little evidence on scores to predict patients‘ behavior. Most assessments come from outside the ICU, but may be promising in critical care.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This review underscores the need for the development of violence risk assessment tools tailored to the ICU, as the challenges with violent ICU patients differ from other populations. New predictive models must be developed including factors associated with patients’ violent behavior in ICUs as compiled in this review.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51322,"journal":{"name":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 103957"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339725000187","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Workplace violence (WPV) presents challenges in intensive care units (ICUs) calling for reliable prediction of violence. This narrative review aimed to identify and evaluate risk assessment tools from acute care settings which are or might be used to predict violent behavior in adult ICU patients focusing on their performance and clinical utility.

Methods

A screening of PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar was conducted to identify risk scores used in the acute care setting such as emergency departments, hospitals and ICUs. Risk factors, predictive validity of scores and their relevance to the ICU setting were evaluated.

Results

24 studies were included. Two studies reported the use in general ICU populations, while eight studies were conducted in psychiatric ICUs and 14 studies implemented the use of risk tools in emergency departments or general wards. Ten risk scores were identified using 30 different variables. Those could be categorized into patient demographics, behavior, history of violence, mental status and other items such as sleep disturbances. The Broset Violence Checklist (BVC) was the most commonly used risk score. It showed moderate predictive accuracy in psychiatric settings including psychiatric ICUs, but limited validation for general ICUs. The overall evidence level was low with serious risk of bias. Other tools demonstrated varying sensitivity and specificity but lacked validation in ICUs.

Implications for clinical practice

ICU nurses and physicians are often subjected to violence. There is little evidence on scores to predict patients‘ behavior. Most assessments come from outside the ICU, but may be promising in critical care.

Conclusion

This review underscores the need for the development of violence risk assessment tools tailored to the ICU, as the challenges with violent ICU patients differ from other populations. New predictive models must be developed including factors associated with patients’ violent behavior in ICUs as compiled in this review.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
危重患者暴力行为的风险分层:当前的评估工具。
背景:工作场所暴力(WPV)对重症监护病房(ICUs)提出了挑战,要求对暴力进行可靠的预测。本叙述性综述旨在识别和评估急性护理环境中的风险评估工具,这些工具用于或可能用于预测成人ICU患者的暴力行为,重点关注其表现和临床效用。方法:对PubMed、Scopus和谷歌Scholar进行筛选,确定在急诊科、医院和icu等急症护理环境中使用的风险评分。评估危险因素、评分的预测有效性及其与ICU环境的相关性。结果:共纳入24项研究。2项研究报告了在普通ICU人群中的使用,8项研究在精神科ICU中进行,14项研究在急诊科或普通病房中使用风险工具。使用30个不同的变量确定了10个风险评分。这些数据可以分为患者人口统计、行为、暴力史、精神状态和睡眠障碍等其他项目。布罗塞特暴力检查表(BVC)是最常用的风险评分。它在包括精神科icu在内的精神科环境中显示出中等的预测准确性,但对普通icu的验证有限。总体证据水平较低,存在严重的偏倚风险。其他工具表现出不同的敏感性和特异性,但缺乏在icu中的验证。对临床实践的启示:ICU护士和医生经常遭受暴力。几乎没有证据表明分数可以预测病人的行为。大多数评估来自ICU之外,但在重症监护中可能很有希望。结论:本综述强调了开发针对ICU的暴力风险评估工具的必要性,因为暴力ICU患者面临的挑战与其他人群不同。必须开发新的预测模型,包括与本综述所编制的icu患者暴力行为相关的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
15.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The aims of Intensive and Critical Care Nursing are to promote excellence of care of critically ill patients by specialist nurses and their professional colleagues; to provide an international and interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and exchange of research findings, experience and ideas; to develop and enhance the knowledge, skills, attitudes and creative thinking essential to good critical care nursing practice. The journal publishes reviews, updates and feature articles in addition to original papers and significant preliminary communications. Articles may deal with any part of practice including relevant clinical, research, educational, psychological and technological aspects.
期刊最新文献
Lower quadriceps muscle mass assessed by ultrasound predicts intensive care unit mortality: A cohort study with prospective data collection Sound levels in single vs. double bed ICU rooms: A high-resolution sound study The relationship between alarm fatigue and burnout among neonatal intensive care unit nurses: A multi-center cross-sectional study Losing a close person to death in ICU: A thematic analysis of bereaved family members’ experiences of end-of-life care Greening the intensive care unit: The ethical responsibility of ICU nursing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1