Uncertainty in the Carbon Footprint Accounting and Evaluation of Textile and Apparel Products: A systematic review

IF 9.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Journal of Cleaner Production Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144885
Qing He, Xiongying Wu, Xuemei Ding
{"title":"Uncertainty in the Carbon Footprint Accounting and Evaluation of Textile and Apparel Products: A systematic review","authors":"Qing He, Xiongying Wu, Xuemei Ding","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The textile and apparel industry is pivotal in the global economy but faces significant environmental challenges, particularly regarding Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions reduction. Carbon Footprint of a Product (CFP) serves as an effective measure of carbon emissions and has garnered widespread attention within the industry. However, there is a lack of comprehensive accounting and analysis of its uncertainties, especially in the textile and apparel sector. This study analyzes the main factors influencing uncertainties in CFP and categorizes them based on the accounting process and life cycle characteristics of textile and apparel products. It identifies the primary factors affecting uncertainty as the definition of system boundaries, the quality of activity data and emission factor data, the selection of allocation methods, and the setting of scenarios. Methodological uncertainty, in addition to parameter, scenario, and model uncertainties, should also be considered. A review of 1,072 CFP related publications on textile and apparel products from 2000 to 2023 revealed that 38 mentioned uncertainties, with only 10 providing qualitative or quantitative assessments, primarily focusing on parameter uncertainty. The main techniques identified for summarizing uncertainty analysis methods are Monte Carlo simulation (MCS), pedigree matrix and Data Quality Indicator (DQI) methods, or a combination of both (DQI+MCS), and sensitivity analysis (SA). Future work should focus on enhancing attention to model, scenario, and methodological uncertainty to establish a more systematic and comprehensive evaluation framework. Digital acquisition technology, blockchain technology, modular theory and fuzzy methods should be used to improve data collection methods and optimize the selection and verification of data sources, thereby reducing uncertainties at the source.","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144885","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The textile and apparel industry is pivotal in the global economy but faces significant environmental challenges, particularly regarding Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions reduction. Carbon Footprint of a Product (CFP) serves as an effective measure of carbon emissions and has garnered widespread attention within the industry. However, there is a lack of comprehensive accounting and analysis of its uncertainties, especially in the textile and apparel sector. This study analyzes the main factors influencing uncertainties in CFP and categorizes them based on the accounting process and life cycle characteristics of textile and apparel products. It identifies the primary factors affecting uncertainty as the definition of system boundaries, the quality of activity data and emission factor data, the selection of allocation methods, and the setting of scenarios. Methodological uncertainty, in addition to parameter, scenario, and model uncertainties, should also be considered. A review of 1,072 CFP related publications on textile and apparel products from 2000 to 2023 revealed that 38 mentioned uncertainties, with only 10 providing qualitative or quantitative assessments, primarily focusing on parameter uncertainty. The main techniques identified for summarizing uncertainty analysis methods are Monte Carlo simulation (MCS), pedigree matrix and Data Quality Indicator (DQI) methods, or a combination of both (DQI+MCS), and sensitivity analysis (SA). Future work should focus on enhancing attention to model, scenario, and methodological uncertainty to establish a more systematic and comprehensive evaluation framework. Digital acquisition technology, blockchain technology, modular theory and fuzzy methods should be used to improve data collection methods and optimize the selection and verification of data sources, thereby reducing uncertainties at the source.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
期刊最新文献
Recent Advances in Sophorolipid Production: from Laboratory to Pilot Scale and Beyond Uncertainty in the Carbon Footprint Accounting and Evaluation of Textile and Apparel Products: A systematic review The role of carbon tax in the transition from a linear economy to a circular economy business model in manufacturing An intelligent scheduling model for achieving green automotive outbound logistics Relative return on assets in farms and its economic and environmental drivers. Perspective of the European Union and the Wielkopolska region (Poland)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1