Uncertainty in the Carbon Footprint accounting and evaluation of textile and apparel products: A systematic review

IF 10 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Journal of Cleaner Production Pub Date : 2025-02-10 Epub Date: 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144885
Qing He , Xiongying Wu , Xuemei Ding
{"title":"Uncertainty in the Carbon Footprint accounting and evaluation of textile and apparel products: A systematic review","authors":"Qing He ,&nbsp;Xiongying Wu ,&nbsp;Xuemei Ding","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The textile and apparel industry is pivotal in the global economy but faces significant environmental challenges, particularly regarding Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions reduction. Carbon Footprint of a Product (CFP) serves as an effective measure of carbon emissions and has garnered widespread attention within the industry. However, there is a lack of comprehensive accounting and analysis of its uncertainties, especially in the textile and apparel sector. This study analyzes the main factors influencing uncertainties in CFP and categorizes them based on the accounting process and life cycle characteristics of textile and apparel products. It identifies the primary factors affecting uncertainty as the definition of system boundaries, the quality of activity data and emission factor data, the selection of allocation methods, and the setting of scenarios. Methodological uncertainty, in addition to parameter, scenario, and model uncertainties, should also be considered. A review of 1072 CFP related publications on textile and apparel products from 2000 to 2023 revealed that 38 mentioned uncertainties, with only 10 providing qualitative or quantitative assessments, primarily focusing on parameter uncertainty. The main techniques identified for summarizing uncertainty analysis methods are Monte Carlo simulation (MCS), pedigree matrix and Data Quality Indicator (DQI) methods, or a combination of both (DQI + MCS), and sensitivity analysis (SA). Future work should focus on enhancing attention to model, scenario, and methodological uncertainty to establish a more systematic and comprehensive evaluation framework. Digital acquisition technology, blockchain technology, modular theory and fuzzy methods should be used to improve data collection methods and optimize the selection and verification of data sources, thereby reducing uncertainties at the source.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"492 ","pages":"Article 144885"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652625002355","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The textile and apparel industry is pivotal in the global economy but faces significant environmental challenges, particularly regarding Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions reduction. Carbon Footprint of a Product (CFP) serves as an effective measure of carbon emissions and has garnered widespread attention within the industry. However, there is a lack of comprehensive accounting and analysis of its uncertainties, especially in the textile and apparel sector. This study analyzes the main factors influencing uncertainties in CFP and categorizes them based on the accounting process and life cycle characteristics of textile and apparel products. It identifies the primary factors affecting uncertainty as the definition of system boundaries, the quality of activity data and emission factor data, the selection of allocation methods, and the setting of scenarios. Methodological uncertainty, in addition to parameter, scenario, and model uncertainties, should also be considered. A review of 1072 CFP related publications on textile and apparel products from 2000 to 2023 revealed that 38 mentioned uncertainties, with only 10 providing qualitative or quantitative assessments, primarily focusing on parameter uncertainty. The main techniques identified for summarizing uncertainty analysis methods are Monte Carlo simulation (MCS), pedigree matrix and Data Quality Indicator (DQI) methods, or a combination of both (DQI + MCS), and sensitivity analysis (SA). Future work should focus on enhancing attention to model, scenario, and methodological uncertainty to establish a more systematic and comprehensive evaluation framework. Digital acquisition technology, blockchain technology, modular theory and fuzzy methods should be used to improve data collection methods and optimize the selection and verification of data sources, thereby reducing uncertainties at the source.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纺织服装产品碳足迹核算与评价中的不确定性:系统综述
纺织和服装行业在全球经济中举足轻重,但面临着重大的环境挑战,特别是在温室气体(GHG)减排方面。产品的碳足迹(CFP)作为一种有效的碳排放衡量标准,已经引起了业界的广泛关注。然而,缺乏对其不确定性的全面核算和分析,特别是在纺织和服装部门。本文从纺织服装产品的核算过程和生命周期特点出发,分析了影响CFP不确定性的主要因素,并对其进行了分类。它确定了影响不确定性的主要因素,包括系统边界的定义、活动数据和排放因子数据的质量、分配方法的选择以及情景的设置。除了参数、情景和模型的不确定性外,还应考虑方法上的不确定性。对2000年至2023年间1072篇CFP相关的纺织品和服装产品出版物的回顾显示,38篇提到了不确定性,只有10篇提供了定性或定量评估,主要集中在参数不确定性上。总结不确定性分析方法的主要技术是蒙特卡罗模拟(MCS)、系谱矩阵和数据质量指标(DQI)方法,或两者的组合(DQI+MCS)和敏感性分析(SA)。未来的工作应侧重于加强对模型、情景和方法不确定性的关注,以建立一个更系统、更全面的评估框架。利用数字采集技术、区块链技术、模块化理论和模糊方法,改进数据采集方法,优化数据源的选择和验证,减少数据源的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
期刊最新文献
Reconfiguring climate–health risks with development: Contrasting heat- and air-pollution–attributable mortality across 152 countries and implications for sustainable urban transitions Algorithm optimization of neural network models for improved fault diagnosis and reliability enhancement in photovoltaic systems: A sustainability approach From molecular ferroptosis to ecosystem recovery: A metal-driven temporal ecological switch as a hidden node of wetland resilience Network-enabled dynamic modeling unveils divergent land-carbon futures and governance pathways in a megaregion Exploring UK consumer perceptions and willingness to adopt alternative wine packaging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1