Simultaneous vs Staged Procedures for Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: Reduced Infection, Cost, and Readmission Rates Associated With Simultaneous Procedures

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Arthroplasty Today Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.artd.2024.101611
Aaron Singh BA, Travis M. Kotzur BS, Kathleen Lundquist MD, Blaire C. Peterson BS, William H. Young MD, Chance C. Moore MD, Frank Buttacavoli MD
{"title":"Simultaneous vs Staged Procedures for Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: Reduced Infection, Cost, and Readmission Rates Associated With Simultaneous Procedures","authors":"Aaron Singh BA,&nbsp;Travis M. Kotzur BS,&nbsp;Kathleen Lundquist MD,&nbsp;Blaire C. Peterson BS,&nbsp;William H. Young MD,&nbsp;Chance C. Moore MD,&nbsp;Frank Buttacavoli MD","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Many patients require total knee arthroplasty (TKA) bilaterally; however, there is limited data on bilateral procedures. This study aims to compare medical and surgical complications and hospital-related outcomes between simultaneous and staged bilateral TKA. We hypothesize that staged procedures will have superior outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study queried the National Readmissions Database, years 2016-2020, for patients undergoing bilateral TKA via <em>ICD-10</em> codes. For patients undergoing staged procedures, outcomes were compared in aggregate for comparison to simultaneous operations. Multivariate regression was performed to assess complications. Negative binomial regression was utilized for 30-day readmission, reoperation, and discharge disposition. Quasi-Poisson regression was performed to assess total charges. Demographics and comorbidities, measured via Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, were controlled for in our analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 210,682 patients, 89,568 (42.51%) undergoing simultaneous bilateral and 121,115 (57.49%) undergoing staged bilateral TKA, were included. The staged cohort had higher odds of medical complications (odds ratio (OR), 1.14; <em>P</em> &lt; .001), reduced surgical complications (OR, 0.51; <em>P</em> &lt; .001), and increased odds of routine discharges (OR, 1.39; <em>P</em> &lt; .001). They also had increased odds of readmission (OR, 1.25; <em>P</em> &lt; .001), reoperation (OR, 1.56; <em>P</em> &lt; .001), and greater total charges (OR, 1.18; <em>P</em> &lt; .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our results demonstrate that, for some patients, simultaneous procedures may be a viable option. While staged operations were associated with reduced surgical complications and resulted in better discharge dispositions, they were also associated with greater medical complications, readmissions, reoperations, and total cost. Surgeons should consider individual patient risks and preferences when planning bilateral TKA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 101611"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11770484/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroplasty Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344124002966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Many patients require total knee arthroplasty (TKA) bilaterally; however, there is limited data on bilateral procedures. This study aims to compare medical and surgical complications and hospital-related outcomes between simultaneous and staged bilateral TKA. We hypothesize that staged procedures will have superior outcomes.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study queried the National Readmissions Database, years 2016-2020, for patients undergoing bilateral TKA via ICD-10 codes. For patients undergoing staged procedures, outcomes were compared in aggregate for comparison to simultaneous operations. Multivariate regression was performed to assess complications. Negative binomial regression was utilized for 30-day readmission, reoperation, and discharge disposition. Quasi-Poisson regression was performed to assess total charges. Demographics and comorbidities, measured via Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, were controlled for in our analysis.

Results

A total of 210,682 patients, 89,568 (42.51%) undergoing simultaneous bilateral and 121,115 (57.49%) undergoing staged bilateral TKA, were included. The staged cohort had higher odds of medical complications (odds ratio (OR), 1.14; P < .001), reduced surgical complications (OR, 0.51; P < .001), and increased odds of routine discharges (OR, 1.39; P < .001). They also had increased odds of readmission (OR, 1.25; P < .001), reoperation (OR, 1.56; P < .001), and greater total charges (OR, 1.18; P < .001).

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate that, for some patients, simultaneous procedures may be a viable option. While staged operations were associated with reduced surgical complications and resulted in better discharge dispositions, they were also associated with greater medical complications, readmissions, reoperations, and total cost. Surgeons should consider individual patient risks and preferences when planning bilateral TKA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Controversies in Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis
IF 1.8 4区 医学Orthopedic Clinics of North AmericaPub Date : 2006-04-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2005.09.003
Randall T. Loder MD
Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: Diagnosis and Management.
IF 4 3区 医学American family physicianPub Date : 2017-06-15 DOI:
David M Peck, Lisa M Voss, Tyler T Voss
Controversies in management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis.
IF 1.9 World Journal of OrthopedicsPub Date : 2016-02-18 DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i2.78
A. Johari, R. Pandey
来源期刊
Arthroplasty Today
Arthroplasty Today Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
258
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Arthroplasty Today is a companion journal to the Journal of Arthroplasty. The journal Arthroplasty Today brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement of the hip and knee in an open-access, online format. Arthroplasty Today solicits manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas of scientific endeavor that relate to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with patient outcomes, economic and policy issues, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, and biologic response to arthroplasty. The journal focuses on case reports. It is the purpose of Arthroplasty Today to present material to practicing orthopaedic surgeons that will keep them abreast of developments in the field, prove useful in the care of patients, and aid in understanding the scientific foundation of this subspecialty area of joint replacement. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal''s area of interest. Their participation ensures that each issue of Arthroplasty Today provides the reader with timely, peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality.
期刊最新文献
Outcomes After Patellofemoral Arthroplasty With the Arthrex iBalance—A Third Generation Implant The Prediction of Venous Thromboembolism Using Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Lower Extremity Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review Total Hip Arthroplasty After Gunshot-Related Hip Injuries: Case Series and Review of Literature Abdominal Pannus Should Not Dictate Surgical Approach in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty State Healthcare Regulations and Total Knee Arthroplasty Prices Across the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1