Mazen Kallel, Emmanuel De Schlichting, Valerie Fraix, Anna Castrioto, Elena Moro, Louise Cordier, Eric Seigneuret, Stephan Chabardes
{"title":"COMPARING DIRECTIONAL AND OMNIDIRECTIONAL DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION IN PARKINSON'S DISEASE PATIENTS.","authors":"Mazen Kallel, Emmanuel De Schlichting, Valerie Fraix, Anna Castrioto, Elena Moro, Louise Cordier, Eric Seigneuret, Stephan Chabardes","doi":"10.1159/000542423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In 2015, directional leads have been released in Europe for deep brain stimulation (DBS) and have been particularly used for subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS for Parkinson's disease (PD). In this study we aimed to compare an omnidirectional and directional leads cohort of PD patients when it comes to clinical effectiveness and to assess the correlation with volume of tissue activated - target overlap (VTA-target).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 60 consecutive patients were retrospectively included. 27 patients with bilateral directional leads were compared to 33 patients with bilateral omnidirectional leads. MDS-UPDRS part III scores, levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD), and VTA overlaps using both motor STN region and motor improvement sweetspot volume were compared at 12 months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There is a significantly higher LEDD reduction in the directional leads group (51.3 % reduction vs 42.7% reduction, p= 0.042) when compared to the omnidirectional group, with similar MDS-UPDRS III motor scores at 12 months. Omnidirectional leads patients had a significantly superior VTA-motor STN overlap volume than directional leads patients (32.01 mm3 vs 20.38 mm2, p = 0.0226). In directional leads patients, LEDD reduction was correlated to VTA overlap with the overall motor improvement mean map sweetspot (R = 0.36, p = 0.036), which was not the case for omnidirectional leads patients (R = 0.11, p = 0.276). Forty one percent of patients implanted with directional leads had a directional stimulation setting at 12 months, compared to thirty three percent at 3 months follow up. In directional leads patient's subgroup analysis, there was no significant difference in MDS UPDRS III scores, LEDD reduction, VTA overlaps with motor STN or overall motor improvement mean map sweetspot between patients stimulated omnidirectionally and directionally at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At 12 months, when compared to omnidirectional leads, directional leads manage with smaller VTA-target overlaps to obtain comparable MDS-UPDRS III scores with greater LEDD reduction in STN DBS for PD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":22078,"journal":{"name":"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542423","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: In 2015, directional leads have been released in Europe for deep brain stimulation (DBS) and have been particularly used for subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS for Parkinson's disease (PD). In this study we aimed to compare an omnidirectional and directional leads cohort of PD patients when it comes to clinical effectiveness and to assess the correlation with volume of tissue activated - target overlap (VTA-target).
Methods: A total of 60 consecutive patients were retrospectively included. 27 patients with bilateral directional leads were compared to 33 patients with bilateral omnidirectional leads. MDS-UPDRS part III scores, levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD), and VTA overlaps using both motor STN region and motor improvement sweetspot volume were compared at 12 months after surgery.
Results: There is a significantly higher LEDD reduction in the directional leads group (51.3 % reduction vs 42.7% reduction, p= 0.042) when compared to the omnidirectional group, with similar MDS-UPDRS III motor scores at 12 months. Omnidirectional leads patients had a significantly superior VTA-motor STN overlap volume than directional leads patients (32.01 mm3 vs 20.38 mm2, p = 0.0226). In directional leads patients, LEDD reduction was correlated to VTA overlap with the overall motor improvement mean map sweetspot (R = 0.36, p = 0.036), which was not the case for omnidirectional leads patients (R = 0.11, p = 0.276). Forty one percent of patients implanted with directional leads had a directional stimulation setting at 12 months, compared to thirty three percent at 3 months follow up. In directional leads patient's subgroup analysis, there was no significant difference in MDS UPDRS III scores, LEDD reduction, VTA overlaps with motor STN or overall motor improvement mean map sweetspot between patients stimulated omnidirectionally and directionally at 12 months.
Conclusion: At 12 months, when compared to omnidirectional leads, directional leads manage with smaller VTA-target overlaps to obtain comparable MDS-UPDRS III scores with greater LEDD reduction in STN DBS for PD patients.
期刊介绍:
''Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery'' provides a single source for the reader to keep abreast of developments in the most rapidly advancing subspecialty within neurosurgery. Technological advances in computer-assisted surgery, robotics, imaging and neurophysiology are being applied to clinical problems with ever-increasing rapidity in stereotaxis more than any other field, providing opportunities for new approaches to surgical and radiotherapeutic management of diseases of the brain, spinal cord, and spine. Issues feature advances in the use of deep-brain stimulation, imaging-guided techniques in stereotactic biopsy and craniotomy, stereotactic radiosurgery, and stereotactically implanted and guided radiotherapeutics and biologicals in the treatment of functional and movement disorders, brain tumors, and other diseases of the brain. Background information from basic science laboratories related to such clinical advances provides the reader with an overall perspective of this field. Proceedings and abstracts from many of the key international meetings furnish an overview of this specialty available nowhere else. ''Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery'' meets the information needs of both investigators and clinicians in this rapidly advancing field.