Radiographic Soft Tissue Thickness is not a Risk Factor for Infection after Primary Total Ankle Arthroplasty.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1053/j.jfas.2025.01.012
Kevin A Wu, Albert T Anastasio, Katherine M Kutzer, Alexandra N Krez, James K DeOrio, James A Nunley, Mark E Easley, Samuel B Adams
{"title":"Radiographic Soft Tissue Thickness is not a Risk Factor for Infection after Primary Total Ankle Arthroplasty.","authors":"Kevin A Wu, Albert T Anastasio, Katherine M Kutzer, Alexandra N Krez, James K DeOrio, James A Nunley, Mark E Easley, Samuel B Adams","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2025.01.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As the incidence of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) for the management of end-stage arthritis is on the rise, identification of risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is essential. There has been limited research exploring the use of radiographic soft tissue thickness in TAA despite its predictive value in other forms of arthroplasty. This study evaluated the predictive capabilities of radiographic soft-tissue thickness for PJI following TAA. A retrospective analysis of 323 patients at a single institution who underwent primary TAA from 2003 to 2019 was conducted. Patient demographics, comorbidities, indication for surgery, prosthesis type and tourniquet time were recorded. Tibial-Tissue and Talus-Tissue distances were measured on preoperative lateral radiographic imaging. Logistic regression was utilized to determine the Odds Ratio (OR) of risk factors for the occurrence of PJI. Of the 323 patients, 6 patients (1.86%) developed a PJI. Average duration of follow-up was 8.42 ± 2.52 years. Neither Tibial-Tissue (OR= 0.975; 95% CI [0.947 - 1.004]; p = 0.09) nor Talus-Tissue thickness (OR= 0.976; 95% CI [0.940 - 1.012]; p = 0.18) were significant predictors of PJI. Although not statistically significant, the infected cohort had smaller average Tibial-Tissue (2.20 vs. 2.53 cm; p=0.05) and Talus-Tissue thickness (2.19 vs. 2.44 cm; p=0.36) compared to the non-infected cohort. Measurements such as Tibial-Tissue length and Talus-Tissue length were not significant predictors of PJI following primary TAA. These findings underscore the necessity for additional research to identify modifiable risk factors aimed at reducing PJI rates and enhancing patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2025.01.012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the incidence of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) for the management of end-stage arthritis is on the rise, identification of risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is essential. There has been limited research exploring the use of radiographic soft tissue thickness in TAA despite its predictive value in other forms of arthroplasty. This study evaluated the predictive capabilities of radiographic soft-tissue thickness for PJI following TAA. A retrospective analysis of 323 patients at a single institution who underwent primary TAA from 2003 to 2019 was conducted. Patient demographics, comorbidities, indication for surgery, prosthesis type and tourniquet time were recorded. Tibial-Tissue and Talus-Tissue distances were measured on preoperative lateral radiographic imaging. Logistic regression was utilized to determine the Odds Ratio (OR) of risk factors for the occurrence of PJI. Of the 323 patients, 6 patients (1.86%) developed a PJI. Average duration of follow-up was 8.42 ± 2.52 years. Neither Tibial-Tissue (OR= 0.975; 95% CI [0.947 - 1.004]; p = 0.09) nor Talus-Tissue thickness (OR= 0.976; 95% CI [0.940 - 1.012]; p = 0.18) were significant predictors of PJI. Although not statistically significant, the infected cohort had smaller average Tibial-Tissue (2.20 vs. 2.53 cm; p=0.05) and Talus-Tissue thickness (2.19 vs. 2.44 cm; p=0.36) compared to the non-infected cohort. Measurements such as Tibial-Tissue length and Talus-Tissue length were not significant predictors of PJI following primary TAA. These findings underscore the necessity for additional research to identify modifiable risk factors aimed at reducing PJI rates and enhancing patient outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
234
审稿时长
29.8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery is the leading source for original, clinically-focused articles on the surgical and medical management of the foot and ankle. Each bi-monthly, peer-reviewed issue addresses relevant topics to the profession, such as: adult reconstruction of the forefoot; adult reconstruction of the hindfoot and ankle; diabetes; medicine/rheumatology; pediatrics; research; sports medicine; trauma; and tumors.
期刊最新文献
Radiographic Soft Tissue Thickness is not a Risk Factor for Infection after Primary Total Ankle Arthroplasty. Crossed Screws Versus Plating Supplemented with an Interfragmentary Screw in First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Rescue of Interfragmentary Compression in Screw Stripping Failures: The Efficacy of NiTiNOL. Risk Factors for Postoperative Infection in Patients After Pilon Fracture Fixation. Outcomes Following Modified Chevron Osteotomy Combined With Akin Osteotomy for Severe Hallux Valgus: A Prospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1