Quality of life in breast cancer survivors: An ambiguous loss perspective

IF 4.5 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Journal of Family Theory & Review Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1111/jftr.12612
Caroline Salafia, Kari Adamsons
{"title":"Quality of life in breast cancer survivors: An ambiguous loss perspective","authors":"Caroline Salafia,&nbsp;Kari Adamsons","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Breast cancer is the second most common cancer diagnosed among women in the United States. Although advances in detection and medical treatment have improved survival rates, breast cancer survivors experience physical symptoms and psychological distress that can adversely impact their quality of life. Examining the quality of life in breast cancer survivors is important as it may inform supportive services, patient-centered care, and well-being after treatment. Theoretical perspectives such as ambiguous loss theory can assist in understanding the factors that shape quality of life. Ambiguous loss theory, developed by Pauline Boss, refers to a loss that remains unclear, unresolved, and lacks closure. Grief theorists have acknowledged grief associated with symbolic losses, such as the loss of health status. The current article integrates empirical research and established constructs derived from ambiguous loss theory to develop a middle-range theory focused on explaining quality of life among breast cancer survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"17 3","pages":"549-564"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jftr.12612","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Breast cancer is the second most common cancer diagnosed among women in the United States. Although advances in detection and medical treatment have improved survival rates, breast cancer survivors experience physical symptoms and psychological distress that can adversely impact their quality of life. Examining the quality of life in breast cancer survivors is important as it may inform supportive services, patient-centered care, and well-being after treatment. Theoretical perspectives such as ambiguous loss theory can assist in understanding the factors that shape quality of life. Ambiguous loss theory, developed by Pauline Boss, refers to a loss that remains unclear, unresolved, and lacks closure. Grief theorists have acknowledged grief associated with symbolic losses, such as the loss of health status. The current article integrates empirical research and established constructs derived from ambiguous loss theory to develop a middle-range theory focused on explaining quality of life among breast cancer survivors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳腺癌幸存者的生活质量:一个模糊的损失视角
乳腺癌是美国女性中第二常见的癌症。虽然检测和医疗方面的进步提高了生存率,但乳腺癌幸存者会经历身体症状和心理困扰,这可能对她们的生活质量产生不利影响。检查乳腺癌幸存者的生活质量很重要,因为它可以为支持性服务、以患者为中心的护理和治疗后的健康提供信息。理论观点,如模糊损失理论可以帮助理解影响生活质量的因素。由Pauline Boss提出的模糊损失理论,指的是仍然不清楚、未解决、缺乏结束的损失。悲伤理论家已经承认悲伤与象征性的损失有关,比如健康状况的丧失。本文结合实证研究和从模糊损失理论中衍生的已建立的结构,建立了一个中等范围的理论,专注于解释乳腺癌幸存者的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
Disguising the Familiar: Considering Internal Confidentiality in Individual Interviews With Partners and Families Critical Identity Theory: Integrating Intersectional Family Perspectives With Symbolic Interactionism The Intersectional Theory of Planned Behavior: Transforming Financial Behavior Theory for Contemporary Families The Grandparent–Grandchild Relationship and Grandchildren's Developmental Outcomes: A Systematic Review With Meta‐Analysis Vernacularizing the Best Interests of the Child: Comparative Insights From Three Legal Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1