Yunling Jiang, Linsen Huang, Chaojie Chen, Yao Zheng and Shi-Zhang Qiao
{"title":"Catalyst–electrolyte interface engineering propels progress in acidic CO2 electroreduction","authors":"Yunling Jiang, Linsen Huang, Chaojie Chen, Yao Zheng and Shi-Zhang Qiao","doi":"10.1039/D4EE05715E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The electrocatalytic carbon dioxide reduction reaction (CO<small><sub>2</sub></small>RR) is a viable strategy that supports carbon neutrality <em>via</em> transforming the dominant greenhouse gas CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> into high-value-added chemicals. The CO<small><sub>2</sub></small>RR in alkaline and neutral media has thrived in recent years owing to their high CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> solubility and favourable CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> activation ability. However, critical challenges have emerged, such as carbonate formation and subsequent CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> crossover to the anodic sides, which decreases the carbon efficiency and stability of the system. Alternatively, acidic media provide an advantageous environment to prevent CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> crossover into the anolyte but suffers from strong HER competition, which is significantly more active under acidic conditions, largely reducing the CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> conversion efficiency. Research on acidic CO<small><sub>2</sub></small>RRs began with some basic studies, including testing various catalysts and electrolytes and designing diverse substrate structures. With advancements in characterization technologies, it has been found that the acidic CO<small><sub>2</sub></small>RR is not only influenced by variations in the composition of the catalyst, substrate or electrolyte, but also by internal changes at the catalyst–electrolyte interface. Thus, catalyst–electrolyte interface engineering, involving electrolyte engineering, catalyst modification, and interface optimization, provides many feasible solutions for acidic CO<small><sub>2</sub></small>RRs to weaken the competing HER. Importantly, it extends acidic CO<small><sub>2</sub></small>RR investigation to the exploration of electronic structures, interfacial adsorption of cations and anions, and surface hydrophobicity of catalysts in the presence of an electric field. However, there are limited articles reviewing acidic CO<small><sub>2</sub></small>RRs from this perspective, and thus, this review aims to discuss the challenges, history, evaluation, and breakthroughs in acidic CO<small><sub>2</sub></small>RRs regarding catalyst–electrolyte interface engineering, thereby providing insights for the future development of acidic CO<small><sub>2</sub></small>RRs.</p>","PeriodicalId":72,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Environmental Science","volume":" 5","pages":" 2025-2049"},"PeriodicalIF":30.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Environmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ee/d4ee05715e","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The electrocatalytic carbon dioxide reduction reaction (CO2RR) is a viable strategy that supports carbon neutrality via transforming the dominant greenhouse gas CO2 into high-value-added chemicals. The CO2RR in alkaline and neutral media has thrived in recent years owing to their high CO2 solubility and favourable CO2 activation ability. However, critical challenges have emerged, such as carbonate formation and subsequent CO2 crossover to the anodic sides, which decreases the carbon efficiency and stability of the system. Alternatively, acidic media provide an advantageous environment to prevent CO2 crossover into the anolyte but suffers from strong HER competition, which is significantly more active under acidic conditions, largely reducing the CO2 conversion efficiency. Research on acidic CO2RRs began with some basic studies, including testing various catalysts and electrolytes and designing diverse substrate structures. With advancements in characterization technologies, it has been found that the acidic CO2RR is not only influenced by variations in the composition of the catalyst, substrate or electrolyte, but also by internal changes at the catalyst–electrolyte interface. Thus, catalyst–electrolyte interface engineering, involving electrolyte engineering, catalyst modification, and interface optimization, provides many feasible solutions for acidic CO2RRs to weaken the competing HER. Importantly, it extends acidic CO2RR investigation to the exploration of electronic structures, interfacial adsorption of cations and anions, and surface hydrophobicity of catalysts in the presence of an electric field. However, there are limited articles reviewing acidic CO2RRs from this perspective, and thus, this review aims to discuss the challenges, history, evaluation, and breakthroughs in acidic CO2RRs regarding catalyst–electrolyte interface engineering, thereby providing insights for the future development of acidic CO2RRs.
期刊介绍:
Energy & Environmental Science, a peer-reviewed scientific journal, publishes original research and review articles covering interdisciplinary topics in the (bio)chemical and (bio)physical sciences, as well as chemical engineering disciplines. Published monthly by the Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC), a not-for-profit publisher, Energy & Environmental Science is recognized as a leading journal. It boasts an impressive impact factor of 8.500 as of 2009, ranking 8th among 140 journals in the category "Chemistry, Multidisciplinary," second among 71 journals in "Energy & Fuels," second among 128 journals in "Engineering, Chemical," and first among 181 scientific journals in "Environmental Sciences."
Energy & Environmental Science publishes various types of articles, including Research Papers (original scientific work), Review Articles, Perspectives, and Minireviews (feature review-type articles of broad interest), Communications (original scientific work of an urgent nature), Opinions (personal, often speculative viewpoints or hypotheses on current topics), and Analysis Articles (in-depth examination of energy-related issues).