Palliative Care Program for Community-Dwelling Individuals With Dementia and Caregivers

JAMA Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1001/jama.2024.25845
Greg A. Sachs, Nina M. Johnson, Sujuan Gao, Alexia M. Torke, Susan E. Hickman, Amy Pemberton, Andrea Vrobel, Minmin Pan, Jennifer West, Kurt Kroenke
{"title":"Palliative Care Program for Community-Dwelling Individuals With Dementia and Caregivers","authors":"Greg A. Sachs, Nina M. Johnson, Sujuan Gao, Alexia M. Torke, Susan E. Hickman, Amy Pemberton, Andrea Vrobel, Minmin Pan, Jennifer West, Kurt Kroenke","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.25845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ImportanceCare management benefits community-dwelling patients with dementia, but studies include few patients with moderate to severe dementia or from racial and ethnic minority populations, lack palliative care, and seldom reduce health care utilization.ObjectiveTo determine whether integrated dementia palliative care reduces dementia symptoms, caregiver depression and distress, and emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations compared with usual care in moderate to severe dementia.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsA randomized clinical trial of community-dwelling patients with moderate to severe dementia and their caregivers enrolled from March 2019 to December 2020 from 2 sites in central Indiana (2-year follow-up completed on January 7, 2023). Electronic health record screening identified patients with dementia; caregivers confirmed eligibility, including dementia stage.InterventionThe intervention consisted of monthly calls from a trained nurse or social worker and evidence-based protocols to help caregivers manage patients’ neuropsychiatric symptoms, caregiver distress, and palliative care issues (eg, advance care planning, symptoms, and hospice) (n = 99). Usual care caregivers received written dementia resource information and patients received care from usual clinicians (n = 102).Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q) severity score (scores range from 0-36, with higher scores indicating worse patient symptoms). Secondary outcomes included Symptom Management in End-of-Life Dementia scores, caregiver depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-8) scores, caregiver distress (NPI-Q distress) scores, and combined ED and hospitalization events. Outcomes were assessed quarterly for 24 months or until patient death.ResultsA total of 201 dyads were enrolled (patients were 67.7% female; 43.3% African American; mean [SD] age, 83.6 [7.9] years); 3 dyads withdrew and 83 patients died over the course of the study, with at least 90% of eligible dyads in both groups completing each of the quarterly assessments. For the dementia palliative care vs usual care groups, mean NPI-Q severity scores were 9.92 vs 9.41 at baseline and 9.15 vs 9.39 at 24 months, respectively (between-group difference at 24 months, −0.24 [95% CI, −2.33 to 1.84]). There was no significant difference in the rate of change in NPI-Q severity from baseline between groups over time (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .87 for the group and time interaction). There were no significant differences in the secondary outcomes, except that there were fewer combined ED and hospitalization events in the dementia palliative care group (mean events/patient, 1.06 in dementia palliative care vs 2.37 in usual care; between-group difference, −1.31 [95% CI, −1.93 to −0.69]; relative risk, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.31 to 0.65]).Conclusions and RelevanceAmong community-dwelling patients with moderate to severe dementia and their caregivers, dementia palliative care, compared with usual care, did not significantly improve patients’ neuropsychiatric symptoms through 24 months.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\" ext-link-type=\"uri\" xlink:href=\"https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03773757?term=NCT03773757&amp;amp;amp;rank=1\">NCT03773757</jats:ext-link>","PeriodicalId":518009,"journal":{"name":"JAMA","volume":"206 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.25845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ImportanceCare management benefits community-dwelling patients with dementia, but studies include few patients with moderate to severe dementia or from racial and ethnic minority populations, lack palliative care, and seldom reduce health care utilization.ObjectiveTo determine whether integrated dementia palliative care reduces dementia symptoms, caregiver depression and distress, and emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations compared with usual care in moderate to severe dementia.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsA randomized clinical trial of community-dwelling patients with moderate to severe dementia and their caregivers enrolled from March 2019 to December 2020 from 2 sites in central Indiana (2-year follow-up completed on January 7, 2023). Electronic health record screening identified patients with dementia; caregivers confirmed eligibility, including dementia stage.InterventionThe intervention consisted of monthly calls from a trained nurse or social worker and evidence-based protocols to help caregivers manage patients’ neuropsychiatric symptoms, caregiver distress, and palliative care issues (eg, advance care planning, symptoms, and hospice) (n = 99). Usual care caregivers received written dementia resource information and patients received care from usual clinicians (n = 102).Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q) severity score (scores range from 0-36, with higher scores indicating worse patient symptoms). Secondary outcomes included Symptom Management in End-of-Life Dementia scores, caregiver depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-8) scores, caregiver distress (NPI-Q distress) scores, and combined ED and hospitalization events. Outcomes were assessed quarterly for 24 months or until patient death.ResultsA total of 201 dyads were enrolled (patients were 67.7% female; 43.3% African American; mean [SD] age, 83.6 [7.9] years); 3 dyads withdrew and 83 patients died over the course of the study, with at least 90% of eligible dyads in both groups completing each of the quarterly assessments. For the dementia palliative care vs usual care groups, mean NPI-Q severity scores were 9.92 vs 9.41 at baseline and 9.15 vs 9.39 at 24 months, respectively (between-group difference at 24 months, −0.24 [95% CI, −2.33 to 1.84]). There was no significant difference in the rate of change in NPI-Q severity from baseline between groups over time (P = .87 for the group and time interaction). There were no significant differences in the secondary outcomes, except that there were fewer combined ED and hospitalization events in the dementia palliative care group (mean events/patient, 1.06 in dementia palliative care vs 2.37 in usual care; between-group difference, −1.31 [95% CI, −1.93 to −0.69]; relative risk, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.31 to 0.65]).Conclusions and RelevanceAmong community-dwelling patients with moderate to severe dementia and their caregivers, dementia palliative care, compared with usual care, did not significantly improve patients’ neuropsychiatric symptoms through 24 months.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03773757
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区居住的痴呆症患者和护理人员的姑息治疗计划
护理管理有利于社区居住的痴呆症患者,但研究包括少数中度至重度痴呆症患者或来自种族和少数民族人群,缺乏姑息治疗,很少减少医疗保健利用。目的确定与常规护理相比,综合痴呆姑息治疗是否能减少中重度痴呆患者的痴呆症状、护理者抑郁和痛苦、急诊科(ED)访问量和住院率。设计、环境和参与者:2019年3月至2020年12月,在印第安纳州中部的两个地点招募了一项随机临床试验,研究对象是社区居住的中度至重度痴呆患者及其护理人员(2年随访于2023年1月7日完成)。电子健康记录筛查确定痴呆患者;护理人员确认了资格,包括痴呆阶段。干预措施:由训练有素的护士或社工每月打来电话,并提供基于证据的方案,以帮助护理人员管理患者的神经精神症状、护理人员痛苦和姑息治疗问题(例如,预先护理计划、症状和临终关怀)(n = 99)。常规护理人员接受书面痴呆资源信息,患者接受常规临床医生的护理(n = 102)。主要结局和测量主要结局为神经精神清查问卷(NPI-Q)严重程度评分(评分范围为0-36,分数越高表明患者症状越严重)。次要结局包括临终痴呆症状管理评分、照顾者抑郁(患者健康问卷-8)评分、照顾者痛苦(NPI-Q痛苦)评分以及ED和住院事件。结果每季度评估一次,持续24个月或直到患者死亡。结果共入组201例,其中女性占67.7%;非裔美国人占43.3%;平均[SD]年龄,83.6[7.9]岁);在整个研究过程中,有3对患者退出,83名患者死亡,两组中至少有90%的符合条件的患者完成了每个季度的评估。对于痴呆姑息治疗组与常规护理组,平均NPI-Q严重程度评分基线时为9.92比9.41,24个月时为9.15比9.39(24个月时组间差异为- 0.24 [95% CI, - 2.33至1.84])。NPI-Q严重程度随时间变化的变化率在两组间无显著差异(组间和时间交互P = 0.87)。次要结局没有显著差异,除了痴呆姑息治疗组ED和住院事件较少(平均事件/患者,痴呆姑息治疗组1.06 vs常规治疗组2.37;组间差异为- 1.31 [95% CI, - 1.93 ~ - 0.69];相对危险度为0.45 [95% CI, 0.31 ~ 0.65])。结论和相关性:在社区居住的中重度痴呆患者及其护理者中,与常规护理相比,痴呆姑息治疗在24个月内并没有显著改善患者的神经精神症状。临床试验注册号:NCT03773757
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Age-Adjusted D-Dimer Cutoff Levels to Exclude Deep Vein Thrombosis. Diagnosis and Treatment of Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo. Age-Adjusted D-Dimer Cutoff Levels to Exclude Deep Vein Thrombosis. Hospital at Home and Transforming US Health Care Delivery. Age-Adjusted D-Dimer Cutoff Levels to Exclude Deep Vein Thrombosis-Reply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1