Comparison of in-clinic assessment of 6MWT by conventional method and using wearable sensors for patients with ATTR-CM.

IF 1 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Future cardiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1080/14796678.2025.2457881
Prem Soman, Michel G Khouri, Daniel Lenihan, Alex Reyentovich, Brett W Sperry, Kristen Sowalsky, Yun Bai, Jing Du, Leonid Katz, Suresh Siddhanti, Jonathan C Fox
{"title":"Comparison of in-clinic assessment of 6MWT by conventional method and using wearable sensors for patients with ATTR-CM.","authors":"Prem Soman, Michel G Khouri, Daniel Lenihan, Alex Reyentovich, Brett W Sperry, Kristen Sowalsky, Yun Bai, Jing Du, Leonid Katz, Suresh Siddhanti, Jonathan C Fox","doi":"10.1080/14796678.2025.2457881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) is used to assess submaximal exercise capacity in clinical trials. Conducting the 6MWT can be challenging when patients cannot visit the clinic due to physical/travel limitations. This pilot study assessed the feasibility of conducting the 6MWT using wearable sensors for patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were enrolled in the phase 3 ATTRibute-CM trial. Sensors were positioned on patients' feet and lower back during the 6MWT. The 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) was compared with the distance measured by a trained observer during a concurrent conventional test. Pearson and concordance correlation coefficients were estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve participants from five centers participated; 11 had evaluable data. Mean 6MWD was 330.3 m (conventional method) and 335.1 m (wearable sensors); mean difference (SD) was 4.7 m (10.95). Pearson and concordance correlation coefficients for 6MWD were 0.998 (95% CI: 0.992-0.999) and 0.997 (95% CI: 0.991-0.999), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 6MWD measured using wearable sensors and by the conventional method were closely correlated. Conducting the 6MWT with wearable sensors may be feasible and as reliable as the conventional method in a monitored clinic setting. Whether at-home 6MWD measured by wearable sensors correlates with in-clinic monitoring deserves further study.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier is NCT03860935.</p>","PeriodicalId":12589,"journal":{"name":"Future cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"75-81"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11812369/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796678.2025.2457881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) is used to assess submaximal exercise capacity in clinical trials. Conducting the 6MWT can be challenging when patients cannot visit the clinic due to physical/travel limitations. This pilot study assessed the feasibility of conducting the 6MWT using wearable sensors for patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy.

Methods: Participants were enrolled in the phase 3 ATTRibute-CM trial. Sensors were positioned on patients' feet and lower back during the 6MWT. The 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) was compared with the distance measured by a trained observer during a concurrent conventional test. Pearson and concordance correlation coefficients were estimated.

Results: Twelve participants from five centers participated; 11 had evaluable data. Mean 6MWD was 330.3 m (conventional method) and 335.1 m (wearable sensors); mean difference (SD) was 4.7 m (10.95). Pearson and concordance correlation coefficients for 6MWD were 0.998 (95% CI: 0.992-0.999) and 0.997 (95% CI: 0.991-0.999), respectively.

Conclusions: The 6MWD measured using wearable sensors and by the conventional method were closely correlated. Conducting the 6MWT with wearable sensors may be feasible and as reliable as the conventional method in a monitored clinic setting. Whether at-home 6MWD measured by wearable sensors correlates with in-clinic monitoring deserves further study.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier is NCT03860935.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
常规方法与可穿戴传感器对atr - cm患者临床6MWT评估的比较
在临床试验中,6分钟步行试验(6MWT)用于评估亚极限运动能力。当患者由于身体/旅行限制而无法前往诊所时,进行6MWT可能具有挑战性。本初步研究评估了使用可穿戴传感器对转甲状腺蛋白淀粉样心肌病患者进行6MWT的可行性。方法:参与者被纳入3期ATTRibute-CM试验。在6MWT期间,传感器被放置在患者的足部和下背部。将6分钟步行距离(6MWD)与训练有素的观察者在同期常规测试中测量的距离进行比较。估计Pearson和concordance相关系数。结果:来自5个中心的12名受试者参与;11个国家有可评价的数据。平均6MWD为330.3 m(常规方法)和335.1 m(可穿戴传感器);平均差异(SD)为4.7 m(10.95)。6MWD的Pearson和一致性相关系数分别为0.998 (95% CI: 0.992-0.999)和0.997 (95% CI: 0.991-0.999)。结论:可穿戴传感器测得的6MWD与常规方法测得的6MWD密切相关。使用可穿戴传感器进行6MWT可能是可行的,并且在监测的诊所环境中与传统方法一样可靠。可穿戴传感器测量的家庭6MWD是否与临床监测相关,值得进一步研究。临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov识别码为NCT03860935。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Future cardiology
Future cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Research advances have contributed to improved outcomes across all specialties, but the rate of advancement in cardiology has been exceptional. Concurrently, the population of patients with cardiac conditions continues to grow and greater public awareness has increased patients" expectations of new drugs and devices. Future Cardiology (ISSN 1479-6678) reflects this new era of cardiology and highlights the new molecular approach to advancing cardiovascular therapy. Coverage will also reflect the major technological advances in bioengineering in cardiology in terms of advanced and robust devices, miniaturization, imaging, system modeling and information management issues.
期刊最新文献
Intra-aortic balloon pump support in patients undergoing durable left ventricular assist device implantation: contemporary evidence and practical considerations. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid exposure and cardiovascular outcomes in dialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mapping and evaluation of global and country-specific cardiovascular disease risk prediction models. Evaluation of the Venus P-valve for transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement in patients with right ventricular outflow tract dysfunction. A rare and unique case of quadricuspid aortic valve in a patient with triple valve disease and lupus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1