A Flipped Classroom Model to Enhance Simulation Education for Percutaneous Renal Surgery.

IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urology Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000752
Robert Qi, Aaron M Potretzke, Christine W Liaw, Elizabeth N Bearrick, Bridget L Findlay, Garrett N Ungerer, Candace F Granberg, Boyd R Viers, Kevin Koo
{"title":"A Flipped Classroom Model to Enhance Simulation Education for Percutaneous Renal Surgery.","authors":"Robert Qi, Aaron M Potretzke, Christine W Liaw, Elizabeth N Bearrick, Bridget L Findlay, Garrett N Ungerer, Candace F Granberg, Boyd R Viers, Kevin Koo","doi":"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The limitations of lectures are magnified when teaching technical skills. A \"flipped classroom\" (FC) model allows learners to first review material and replaces lectures with active teacher-learner engagement. FC has been shown to improve knowledge retention, but its impact on skill acquisition is unknown. This exploratory study assesses the feasibility and learner perception of a FC model for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) simulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Urology residents participated in a PCNL simulation curriculum. Residents first reviewed materials on obtaining percutaneous access, followed by an in-person discussion and 4 simulation activities. Pre/post-lab surveys were collected regarding prior experience, confidence in skills (rating scale from 1-5, unable to perform to can perform independently), and scores on a validated Flipped Classroom Perception Instrument (agreement scale 1-5).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen residents with varying PCNL experience reported significantly increased confidence in obtaining access across all measures (<i>P</i> < .01): performing new access overall, new fluoroscopic access with bull's-eye and triangulation techniques, and using existing access. There was no difference in the increase in confidence ratings based on prior PCNL experience. FC was highly rated, with mean scores on the perception instrument 4.0 to 4.5 before and 4.2 to 4.7 after the activity. Each lab component was perceived as highly effective (overall mean, 4.7; pre-lab materials, 4.3; in-person discussion, 4.4; simulation, 4.8). There was no difference based on prior PCNL experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A FC model was feasible and rated by learners as highly effective for teaching percutaneous renal access and significantly improved residents' skill confidence regardless of prior PCNL experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":45220,"journal":{"name":"Urology Practice","volume":" ","pages":"101097UPJ0000000000000752"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The limitations of lectures are magnified when teaching technical skills. A "flipped classroom" (FC) model allows learners to first review material and replaces lectures with active teacher-learner engagement. FC has been shown to improve knowledge retention, but its impact on skill acquisition is unknown. This exploratory study assesses the feasibility and learner perception of a FC model for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) simulation.

Methods: Urology residents participated in a PCNL simulation curriculum. Residents first reviewed materials on obtaining percutaneous access, followed by an in-person discussion and 4 simulation activities. Pre/post-lab surveys were collected regarding prior experience, confidence in skills (rating scale from 1-5, unable to perform to can perform independently), and scores on a validated Flipped Classroom Perception Instrument (agreement scale 1-5).

Results: Thirteen residents with varying PCNL experience reported significantly increased confidence in obtaining access across all measures (P < .01): performing new access overall, new fluoroscopic access with bull's-eye and triangulation techniques, and using existing access. There was no difference in the increase in confidence ratings based on prior PCNL experience. FC was highly rated, with mean scores on the perception instrument 4.0 to 4.5 before and 4.2 to 4.7 after the activity. Each lab component was perceived as highly effective (overall mean, 4.7; pre-lab materials, 4.3; in-person discussion, 4.4; simulation, 4.8). There was no difference based on prior PCNL experience.

Conclusions: A FC model was feasible and rated by learners as highly effective for teaching percutaneous renal access and significantly improved residents' skill confidence regardless of prior PCNL experience.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urology Practice
Urology Practice UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
163
期刊最新文献
Disproportionality Analysis of Hypotension-Related Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with Type 1a Selective Alpha Blockers in VigiBase. Renal Function After Partial Nephrectomy: A Comparative Analysis of Warm, Cold, and No Ischemia Methods. Risks and Benefits of Caprini Score Recommended Thromboprophylaxis After Radical Prostatectomy and Nephrectomy. Trends in Outpatient Radical Prostatectomy and Same-Day Discharge for Prostate Cancer: Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample and Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample. Evidence-Based Framework for Surgical Irrigation Fluid Stewardship and Endoscopic Case Prioritization During Fluid Shortages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1