A Flipped Classroom Model to Enhance Simulation Education for Percutaneous Renal Surgery.

IF 1.7 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urology Practice Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000752
Robert Qi, Aaron M Potretzke, Christine W Liaw, Elizabeth N Bearrick, Bridget L Findlay, Garrett N Ungerer, Candace F Granberg, Boyd R Viers, Kevin Koo
{"title":"A Flipped Classroom Model to Enhance Simulation Education for Percutaneous Renal Surgery.","authors":"Robert Qi, Aaron M Potretzke, Christine W Liaw, Elizabeth N Bearrick, Bridget L Findlay, Garrett N Ungerer, Candace F Granberg, Boyd R Viers, Kevin Koo","doi":"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The limitations of lectures are magnified when teaching technical skills. A \"flipped classroom\" (FC) model allows learners to first review material and replaces lectures with active teacher-learner engagement. FC has been shown to improve knowledge retention, but its impact on skill acquisition is unknown. This exploratory study assesses the feasibility and learner perception of an FC model for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) simulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Urology residents participated in a PCNL simulation curriculum. Residents first reviewed materials on obtaining percutaneous access, followed by an in-person discussion and 4 simulation activities. Pre-/post-simulation surveys were collected regarding prior experience, confidence in skills (rating scale from 1-5, unable to perform to can perform independently), and scores on a validated Flipped Classroom Perception Instrument (agreement scale 1-5).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen residents with varying PCNL experience reported significantly increased confidence in obtaining access across all measures (<i>P</i> < .01): performing new access overall, new fluoroscopic access with bull's-eye and triangulation techniques, and using existing access. There was no difference in the increase in confidence ratings based on prior PCNL experience. FC was highly rated, with mean scores on the perception instrument 4.0 to 4.5 before and 4.2 to 4.7 after the activity. Each simulation component was perceived as highly effective (overall mean, 4.7; pre-simulation materials, 4.3; in-person discussion, 4.4; simulation, 4.8). There was no difference based on prior PCNL experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An FC model was feasible and rated by learners as highly effective for teaching percutaneous renal access and significantly improved residents' skill confidence regardless of prior PCNL experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":45220,"journal":{"name":"Urology Practice","volume":" ","pages":"187-190"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The limitations of lectures are magnified when teaching technical skills. A "flipped classroom" (FC) model allows learners to first review material and replaces lectures with active teacher-learner engagement. FC has been shown to improve knowledge retention, but its impact on skill acquisition is unknown. This exploratory study assesses the feasibility and learner perception of an FC model for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) simulation.

Methods: Urology residents participated in a PCNL simulation curriculum. Residents first reviewed materials on obtaining percutaneous access, followed by an in-person discussion and 4 simulation activities. Pre-/post-simulation surveys were collected regarding prior experience, confidence in skills (rating scale from 1-5, unable to perform to can perform independently), and scores on a validated Flipped Classroom Perception Instrument (agreement scale 1-5).

Results: Thirteen residents with varying PCNL experience reported significantly increased confidence in obtaining access across all measures (P < .01): performing new access overall, new fluoroscopic access with bull's-eye and triangulation techniques, and using existing access. There was no difference in the increase in confidence ratings based on prior PCNL experience. FC was highly rated, with mean scores on the perception instrument 4.0 to 4.5 before and 4.2 to 4.7 after the activity. Each simulation component was perceived as highly effective (overall mean, 4.7; pre-simulation materials, 4.3; in-person discussion, 4.4; simulation, 4.8). There was no difference based on prior PCNL experience.

Conclusions: An FC model was feasible and rated by learners as highly effective for teaching percutaneous renal access and significantly improved residents' skill confidence regardless of prior PCNL experience.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以翻转课堂模式加强经皮肾外科模拟教学。
导言:在教授技术技能时,讲座的局限性被放大了。“翻转课堂”(FC)模式允许学习者首先复习材料,并以积极的师生参与取代讲课。FC已被证明可以提高知识保留,但其对技能习得的影响尚不清楚。本探索性研究评估了经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)模拟的FC模型的可行性和学习者感知。方法:泌尿外科住院医师参加PCNL模拟课程。住院医师首先回顾了有关经皮穿刺的材料,随后进行了现场讨论和4个模拟活动。实验前/实验后的调查收集了关于先前经验、对技能的信心(评分范围从1-5,无法执行到可以独立执行)以及在经过验证的翻转课堂感知工具上的分数(一致性量表1-5)。结果:13名具有不同PCNL经验的住院医生报告说,他们对所有措施获得通道的信心显著增加(P < 0.01):全面实施新的通道,采用靶心和三角测量技术的新的透视通道,并使用现有的通道。基于先前PCNL经验的信心评级的增加没有差异。FC被高度评价,在活动前和活动后,感知工具的平均得分分别为4.0至4.5和4.2至4.7。每个实验组成部分被认为是非常有效的(总体平均值,4.7;实验前材料,4.3;面对面讨论,4.4分;模拟,4.8)。根据先前的PCNL经验,没有差异。结论:一个FC模型是可行的,学习者认为它对经皮肾通路的教学非常有效,并且显著提高了居民的技能信心,而不管他们之前是否有PCNL经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urology Practice
Urology Practice UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
163
期刊最新文献
Editorial Comment. Editorial Commentary. Editorial Commentary. The Adoption Triangle: How Surgeons, Hospitals, and Industry Can Align on Capital Equipment Decisions. Reply by Authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1