A Randomized Control Trial Comparing the Effects of N-95 Respirator Versus Surgical Mask Use on Resting Metabolic and Respiratory Changes.

Alexander Rothstein, Jessie Hirsch, Alyssa Hillian, Joanne DiFrancisco-Donoghue
{"title":"A Randomized Control Trial Comparing the Effects of N-95 Respirator Versus Surgical Mask Use on Resting Metabolic and Respiratory Changes.","authors":"Alexander Rothstein, Jessie Hirsch, Alyssa Hillian, Joanne DiFrancisco-Donoghue","doi":"10.1097/JOM.0000000000003322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare physiological changes when wearing a N95 and surgical mask at rest.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-two subjects aged 18-55 (19 males; age 22.98 ± 3.83) were recruited. Respiratory and metabolic data were collected using indirect calorimetry under a hood. Volume of oxygen consumed, volume of CO 2 produced, and respiratory exchange ratio were measured. Respiratory rate, minute ventilation, and heart rate were recorded using Hexoskin Smart Shirt apparatus. Testing consisted of the following three 15-minute trials: no mask, surgical mask, and a N95 respirator. Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) was assessed. Results were analyzed using separate repeated measures analyses of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respiratory exchange ratio, minute ventilation, and RPE were significantly higher in both conditions. Highest RPE reported while wearing the N95 mask.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of a surgical or N95 face mask can cause small metabolic, respiratory, and RPE changes. Minor physiological changes were observed but remained within normally expected physiological parameters at rest.</p>","PeriodicalId":94100,"journal":{"name":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","volume":" ","pages":"339-343"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000003322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare physiological changes when wearing a N95 and surgical mask at rest.

Methods: Forty-two subjects aged 18-55 (19 males; age 22.98 ± 3.83) were recruited. Respiratory and metabolic data were collected using indirect calorimetry under a hood. Volume of oxygen consumed, volume of CO 2 produced, and respiratory exchange ratio were measured. Respiratory rate, minute ventilation, and heart rate were recorded using Hexoskin Smart Shirt apparatus. Testing consisted of the following three 15-minute trials: no mask, surgical mask, and a N95 respirator. Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) was assessed. Results were analyzed using separate repeated measures analyses of variance.

Results: Respiratory exchange ratio, minute ventilation, and RPE were significantly higher in both conditions. Highest RPE reported while wearing the N95 mask.

Conclusions: The use of a surgical or N95 face mask can cause small metabolic, respiratory, and RPE changes. Minor physiological changes were observed but remained within normally expected physiological parameters at rest.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项比较N-95呼吸器与外科口罩对静息代谢和呼吸变化影响的随机对照试验。
目的:本研究旨在比较N95和外科口罩在休息时的生理变化。方法:年龄18-55岁的42例受试者(男性19例;年龄(22.98±3.83)。呼吸和代谢数据在罩下使用间接量热法收集。测量VO2、VCO2、RER。使用Hexoskin智能衬衫仪记录RR、MV和HR。测试包括3个15分钟的试验:不戴口罩、外科口罩和N95呼吸器。评估RPE。结果采用单独重复测量方差分析。结果:两组患者的RER、MV、RPE均显著增高。佩戴N95口罩时RPE最高。结论:使用外科口罩或N95口罩可引起较小的代谢、呼吸和RPE变化。观察到轻微的生理变化,但在休息时保持在正常预期的生理参数范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Self-reported work-related stress, depressive symptoms, and health and well-being among certified organic farmers: the Organic Farmer Safety, Health & Life Study (OFSHLS). Comment on: Early Death Among Firefighters: The Need for Further Investigation. Cardiovascular risk factors in 101 night shift and day workers in industry. A cross-sectional study. Mortality Update of a U.S. Cohort of Workers in Petrochemical and Refinery Operations. Artificial Intelligence and Heterogeneous Unemployment Risk Across Regions: Scenario-Based Projections of Alternative Policy Responses in Taiwan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1