Alexander Rothstein, Jessie Hirsch, Alyssa Hillian, Joanne DiFrancisco-Donoghue
{"title":"A Randomized Control Trial Comparing the Effects of N-95 Respirator Versus Surgical Mask Use on Resting Metabolic and Respiratory Changes.","authors":"Alexander Rothstein, Jessie Hirsch, Alyssa Hillian, Joanne DiFrancisco-Donoghue","doi":"10.1097/JOM.0000000000003322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare physiological changes when wearing a N95 and surgical mask at rest.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-two subjects aged 18-55 (19 males; age 22.98 ± 3.83) were recruited. Respiratory and metabolic data were collected using indirect calorimetry under a hood. Volume of oxygen consumed, volume of CO 2 produced, and respiratory exchange ratio were measured. Respiratory rate, minute ventilation, and heart rate were recorded using Hexoskin Smart Shirt apparatus. Testing consisted of the following three 15-minute trials: no mask, surgical mask, and a N95 respirator. Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) was assessed. Results were analyzed using separate repeated measures analyses of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respiratory exchange ratio, minute ventilation, and RPE were significantly higher in both conditions. Highest RPE reported while wearing the N95 mask.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of a surgical or N95 face mask can cause small metabolic, respiratory, and RPE changes. Minor physiological changes were observed but remained within normally expected physiological parameters at rest.</p>","PeriodicalId":94100,"journal":{"name":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","volume":" ","pages":"339-343"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000003322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to compare physiological changes when wearing a N95 and surgical mask at rest.
Methods: Forty-two subjects aged 18-55 (19 males; age 22.98 ± 3.83) were recruited. Respiratory and metabolic data were collected using indirect calorimetry under a hood. Volume of oxygen consumed, volume of CO 2 produced, and respiratory exchange ratio were measured. Respiratory rate, minute ventilation, and heart rate were recorded using Hexoskin Smart Shirt apparatus. Testing consisted of the following three 15-minute trials: no mask, surgical mask, and a N95 respirator. Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) was assessed. Results were analyzed using separate repeated measures analyses of variance.
Results: Respiratory exchange ratio, minute ventilation, and RPE were significantly higher in both conditions. Highest RPE reported while wearing the N95 mask.
Conclusions: The use of a surgical or N95 face mask can cause small metabolic, respiratory, and RPE changes. Minor physiological changes were observed but remained within normally expected physiological parameters at rest.