Comprehensive Evaluation of End-Point Free Energy Methods in DNA-Ligand Interaction Predictions.

IF 5.3 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling Pub Date : 2025-02-24 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01947
Cuiyu Li, Hongyan Du, Chengwei Zhang, Wanying Huang, Xujun Zhang, Tianyue Wang, Dejun Jiang, Tingjun Hou, Ercheng Wang
{"title":"Comprehensive Evaluation of End-Point Free Energy Methods in DNA-Ligand Interaction Predictions.","authors":"Cuiyu Li, Hongyan Du, Chengwei Zhang, Wanying Huang, Xujun Zhang, Tianyue Wang, Dejun Jiang, Tingjun Hou, Ercheng Wang","doi":"10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) serves as a repository of genetic information in cells and is a critical molecular target for various antibiotics and anticancer drugs. A profound understanding of small molecule interaction with DNA is crucial for the rational design of DNA-targeted therapies. While the molecular mechanics/Poisson-Boltzmann surface area (MM/PBSA) and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area (MM/GBSA) approaches have been well established for predicting protein-ligand binding, their application to DNA-ligand interactions has been less explored. In this study, we systematically investigated the binding of 13 diverse small molecules to DNA, evaluating the accuracy of DNA-ligand interaction predictions across different solvation approaches, interior dielectric constants (ε<sub>in</sub>), and molecular force fields. Our results demonstrate that MM/PBSA, using energy-minimized structures (the bsc1 force field and ε<sub>in</sub> = 20), provides the best correlation (<i>R</i><sub>p</sub> = -0.742) with experimental binding affinities, surpassing the performance of rDock scoring functions (best <i>R</i><sub>p</sub> = -0.481). Notably, the interior dielectric constant was found to significantly impact DNA-ligand binding free energy predictions, especially for MM/PBSA. Moreover, both MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA predictions (ε<sub>in</sub> = 16 or 20) exhibited superior performance in distinguishing native-like binding modes within the top-10 poses from decoys, compared to the molecular docking tools used in this study. However, the popular docking software PLANTS demonstrates notable efficacy in predicting the top-1 binding pose. Given the considerably higher computational cost of MM/PBSA, MM/GBSA rescoring with higher ε<sub>in</sub> = 16 or 20 is more efficient for recognizing the native-like binding poses for DNA-ligand systems. This study presents the first detailed exploration of end-point free energy calculations in the context of DNA-ligand interactions and offers valuable insights for the application of the MM/PB(GB)SA methods in this domain.</p>","PeriodicalId":44,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling ","volume":" ","pages":"2014-2025"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling ","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01947","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) serves as a repository of genetic information in cells and is a critical molecular target for various antibiotics and anticancer drugs. A profound understanding of small molecule interaction with DNA is crucial for the rational design of DNA-targeted therapies. While the molecular mechanics/Poisson-Boltzmann surface area (MM/PBSA) and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area (MM/GBSA) approaches have been well established for predicting protein-ligand binding, their application to DNA-ligand interactions has been less explored. In this study, we systematically investigated the binding of 13 diverse small molecules to DNA, evaluating the accuracy of DNA-ligand interaction predictions across different solvation approaches, interior dielectric constants (εin), and molecular force fields. Our results demonstrate that MM/PBSA, using energy-minimized structures (the bsc1 force field and εin = 20), provides the best correlation (Rp = -0.742) with experimental binding affinities, surpassing the performance of rDock scoring functions (best Rp = -0.481). Notably, the interior dielectric constant was found to significantly impact DNA-ligand binding free energy predictions, especially for MM/PBSA. Moreover, both MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA predictions (εin = 16 or 20) exhibited superior performance in distinguishing native-like binding modes within the top-10 poses from decoys, compared to the molecular docking tools used in this study. However, the popular docking software PLANTS demonstrates notable efficacy in predicting the top-1 binding pose. Given the considerably higher computational cost of MM/PBSA, MM/GBSA rescoring with higher εin = 16 or 20 is more efficient for recognizing the native-like binding poses for DNA-ligand systems. This study presents the first detailed exploration of end-point free energy calculations in the context of DNA-ligand interactions and offers valuable insights for the application of the MM/PB(GB)SA methods in this domain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
终点自由能方法在dna -配体相互作用预测中的综合评价。
脱氧核糖核酸(DNA)是细胞中遗传信息的储存库,是各种抗生素和抗癌药物的重要分子靶点。深入了解小分子与DNA的相互作用对于合理设计DNA靶向治疗至关重要。虽然分子力学/泊松-玻尔兹曼表面积(MM/PBSA)和分子力学/广义玻恩表面积(MM/GBSA)方法已经很好地建立了预测蛋白质与配体结合的方法,但它们在dna -配体相互作用中的应用还很少被探索。在这项研究中,我们系统地研究了13种不同的小分子与DNA的结合,评估了DNA-配体相互作用预测在不同溶剂化方法、内部介电常数(εin)和分子力场中的准确性。研究结果表明,使用能量最小化结构(bsc1力场和εin = 20)的MM/PBSA与实验结合亲和力的相关性最好(Rp = -0.742),优于rDock评分函数(最佳Rp = -0.481)。值得注意的是,发现内部介电常数显著影响dna -配体结合自由能的预测,特别是对于MM/PBSA。此外,与本研究中使用的分子对接工具相比,MM/PBSA和MM/GBSA预测(εin = 16或20)在区分前10个姿态与诱饵的原生结合模式方面表现出了更好的性能。然而,流行的对接软件PLANTS在预测top-1绑定姿势方面表现出显著的功效。考虑到MM/PBSA的计算成本较高,当εin = 16或20时,MM/GBSA评分对于识别dna -配体系统的类天然结合姿态更为有效。本研究首次详细探讨了dna -配体相互作用背景下的端点自由能计算,并为MM/PB(GB)SA方法在该领域的应用提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
529
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling publishes papers reporting new methodology and/or important applications in the fields of chemical informatics and molecular modeling. Specific topics include the representation and computer-based searching of chemical databases, molecular modeling, computer-aided molecular design of new materials, catalysts, or ligands, development of new computational methods or efficient algorithms for chemical software, and biopharmaceutical chemistry including analyses of biological activity and other issues related to drug discovery. Astute chemists, computer scientists, and information specialists look to this monthly’s insightful research studies, programming innovations, and software reviews to keep current with advances in this integral, multidisciplinary field. As a subscriber you’ll stay abreast of database search systems, use of graph theory in chemical problems, substructure search systems, pattern recognition and clustering, analysis of chemical and physical data, molecular modeling, graphics and natural language interfaces, bibliometric and citation analysis, and synthesis design and reactions databases.
期刊最新文献
Interpretable ML-DFT Framework for Performance Prediction and Structure-Activity Relationship Analysis of Acidic Copper Plating Levelers. ncProFormer: A CNN-enhanced Transformer for ncRNA Coding-Potential Prediction. GeoPMB: An Interface-Aware Geometric Deep Learning Framework for Peptide-MHCI Binding Prediction with Evolutionary Insight. Multi2Fusion: A Multiomics Fusion Framework with Multilevel Information Integration for Cancer Subtype Classification. Generative AI-Driven Discovery of Next-Generation Electrolytes for Alkali Metal Batteries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1