Facilitators and barriers to parental involvement in neonatal pain management in the NICU: a scoping review.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085881
Lu Feng, Jie Jing, Min Shi, Binzhi Tang, Linli Xie
{"title":"Facilitators and barriers to parental involvement in neonatal pain management in the NICU: a scoping review.","authors":"Lu Feng, Jie Jing, Min Shi, Binzhi Tang, Linli Xie","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Neonatal pain prevention is not only a humanistic but also an ethical imperative. Fitting with the principles of family-centred care, parental involvement in neonatal pain management plays an active role in infant development and parental well-being. However, the process of parental involvement faces constant challenges. To help structure and implement a family engagement programme in neonatal pain management in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), we conducted a scoping review to identify facilitators and barriers to parental involvement in neonatal pain management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted the scoping review using the Arksey and O'Malley framework. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, Scopus, Wanfang database (Chinese), CNKI (Chinese), VIP database(Chinese) and SinoMed (Chinese) were searched systematically for relevant studies published in English and Chinese from inception up to October 2023. We categorised the facilitators and barriers based on the socioecological model and analysed the results thematically in each category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten English qualitative studies were included in the final analysis. The 34 facilitators and 41 barriers extracted were grouped into 4 domains of the socioecological model framework. Of the 10 facilitator themes, the most critical theme was informational and emotional support. Of the 10 barrier themes, the most frequently reported theme was restricted policies and resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our review highlights the essential roles of intrapersonal and interpersonal factors in parental involvement in pain management while suggesting the interconnectedness of factors in various domains within the context of the socioecological model. It implies that most interventions require development and administration at both intrapersonal and interpersonal levels. Regarding the macrolevel, a broad programme with clear regulatory approaches and targeted guidelines could be developed in the future to drive innovations in NICU pain management mode.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 1","pages":"e085881"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11781106/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085881","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Neonatal pain prevention is not only a humanistic but also an ethical imperative. Fitting with the principles of family-centred care, parental involvement in neonatal pain management plays an active role in infant development and parental well-being. However, the process of parental involvement faces constant challenges. To help structure and implement a family engagement programme in neonatal pain management in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), we conducted a scoping review to identify facilitators and barriers to parental involvement in neonatal pain management.

Methods: We conducted the scoping review using the Arksey and O'Malley framework. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, Scopus, Wanfang database (Chinese), CNKI (Chinese), VIP database(Chinese) and SinoMed (Chinese) were searched systematically for relevant studies published in English and Chinese from inception up to October 2023. We categorised the facilitators and barriers based on the socioecological model and analysed the results thematically in each category.

Results: Ten English qualitative studies were included in the final analysis. The 34 facilitators and 41 barriers extracted were grouped into 4 domains of the socioecological model framework. Of the 10 facilitator themes, the most critical theme was informational and emotional support. Of the 10 barrier themes, the most frequently reported theme was restricted policies and resources.

Conclusions: Our review highlights the essential roles of intrapersonal and interpersonal factors in parental involvement in pain management while suggesting the interconnectedness of factors in various domains within the context of the socioecological model. It implies that most interventions require development and administration at both intrapersonal and interpersonal levels. Regarding the macrolevel, a broad programme with clear regulatory approaches and targeted guidelines could be developed in the future to drive innovations in NICU pain management mode.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
促进和障碍父母参与新生儿疼痛管理在新生儿重症监护病房:范围审查。
目的:新生儿疼痛预防不仅是一种人道主义,也是一种伦理责任。符合以家庭为中心的护理原则,父母参与新生儿疼痛管理在婴儿发育和父母福祉中发挥积极作用。然而,父母参与的过程面临着不断的挑战。为了帮助构建和实施新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)新生儿疼痛管理的家庭参与计划,我们进行了一项范围审查,以确定父母参与新生儿疼痛管理的促进因素和障碍。方法:我们使用Arksey和O'Malley框架进行范围审查。系统检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、CINAHL、Scopus、万方数据库(中文版)、中国知网(中文版)、维普数据库(中文版)和中国医学信息网(中文版)自建库至2023年10月发表的中英文相关研究。我们基于社会生态模型对促进因素和阻碍因素进行了分类,并对每个类别的结果进行了专题分析。结果:最终分析纳入10项英文定性研究。提取的34个促进因素和41个障碍被划分为社会生态模型框架的4个领域。在10个推动者主题中,最关键的主题是信息和情感支持。在10个障碍主题中,报告最多的主题是受限制的政策和资源。结论:我们的综述强调了个人和人际因素在父母参与疼痛管理中的重要作用,同时建议在社会生态模型的背景下,各领域因素的相互联系。这意味着大多数干预措施需要在个人和人际层面上进行发展和管理。在宏观层面上,未来可以制定一个具有明确监管方法和有针对性指导方针的广泛计划,以推动新生儿重症监护病房疼痛管理模式的创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Effect of antenatal care attendance on maternal and birth outcomes in Somaliland: a cohort study. Distribution disparities among medical specialists in Thailand: an equity analysis of the national health workforce database (2015-2024). Open-label randomised controlled trial of aripiprazole/sertraline combination in comparison with quetiapine for the clinical and cost-effectiveness of treatment of bipolar depression (the ASCEnD study): study protocol. Do sociodemographic variables influence sexual dysfunction in young people with type 1 diabetes? A quantitative study in Poland. Excitatory amino acid inhibitors in adults with acute moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1