Reducing outpatient wait times through telemedicine: a systematic review and quantitative analysis.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088153
Angelo Capodici, Francesca Noci, Sabina Nuti, Michele Emdin, Stefano Dalmiani, Claudio Passino, Tina Hernandez-Boussard, Alberto Giannoni
{"title":"Reducing outpatient wait times through telemedicine: a systematic review and quantitative analysis.","authors":"Angelo Capodici, Francesca Noci, Sabina Nuti, Michele Emdin, Stefano Dalmiani, Claudio Passino, Tina Hernandez-Boussard, Alberto Giannoni","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Population ageing and the rise in chronic diseases place continual stress on healthcare systems. Scarce resources often impede equitable access to healthcare, particularly in rural areas, resulting in prolonged waiting times and heightened risks of morbidity and mortality. Telemedicine has emerged as a promising solution, offering remote and equitable care that could potentially bridge access gaps and enhance health outcomes. This systematic review aims to quantitatively examine the impact of telemedicine implementation on waiting times, defined as the time passed from the booking of a visit for an outpatient to the administration of the service.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic review was conducted using studies on telemedicine interventions that specifically addressed waiting times. Bias assessment was performed with three tools: ROBINS-I (\"Risk of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions\"), AXIS (\"Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies\") and RoB-2 (\"Risk of Bias-2\"). A weighted mean approach was used to synthesise results, with medians synthesised using a median approach.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Articles in English were retrieved from the PubMed and Scopus databases.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Studies were excluded if they did not specifically address waiting times related to telemedicine interventions. Only studies that considered waiting times defined as the time passed from the booking of a visit for an outpatient to the administration of the service and any telemedicine intervention were included.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>A total of 53 records were included, encompassing 270 388 patients in both the experimental and control groups. The weighted mean reduction in waiting times was calculated, and bias was assessed. No record was evaluated to be at high risk of bias, with 69.8% of studies evaluated at low risk and 26.4% at moderate risk (3.8% were surveys). Results were synthesised using a weighted mean approach for studies reporting means, and a median approach for studies reporting medians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, a weighted mean reduction of 25.4 days in waiting times was observed. Focusing on clinical specialties (n=114 042), the weighted mean reduction amounted to 34.7 days, while in surgical patients (n=156 346), telemedicine was associated with a weighted mean of 17.3 days saved.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of telemedicine solutions may significantly improve waiting times, potentially leading to more efficient and equitable healthcare systems.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42023490822.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 1","pages":"e088153"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784372/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088153","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Population ageing and the rise in chronic diseases place continual stress on healthcare systems. Scarce resources often impede equitable access to healthcare, particularly in rural areas, resulting in prolonged waiting times and heightened risks of morbidity and mortality. Telemedicine has emerged as a promising solution, offering remote and equitable care that could potentially bridge access gaps and enhance health outcomes. This systematic review aims to quantitatively examine the impact of telemedicine implementation on waiting times, defined as the time passed from the booking of a visit for an outpatient to the administration of the service.

Design: A systematic review was conducted using studies on telemedicine interventions that specifically addressed waiting times. Bias assessment was performed with three tools: ROBINS-I ("Risk of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions"), AXIS ("Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies") and RoB-2 ("Risk of Bias-2"). A weighted mean approach was used to synthesise results, with medians synthesised using a median approach.

Data sources: Articles in English were retrieved from the PubMed and Scopus databases.

Eligibility criteria: Studies were excluded if they did not specifically address waiting times related to telemedicine interventions. Only studies that considered waiting times defined as the time passed from the booking of a visit for an outpatient to the administration of the service and any telemedicine intervention were included.

Data extraction and synthesis: A total of 53 records were included, encompassing 270 388 patients in both the experimental and control groups. The weighted mean reduction in waiting times was calculated, and bias was assessed. No record was evaluated to be at high risk of bias, with 69.8% of studies evaluated at low risk and 26.4% at moderate risk (3.8% were surveys). Results were synthesised using a weighted mean approach for studies reporting means, and a median approach for studies reporting medians.

Results: Overall, a weighted mean reduction of 25.4 days in waiting times was observed. Focusing on clinical specialties (n=114 042), the weighted mean reduction amounted to 34.7 days, while in surgical patients (n=156 346), telemedicine was associated with a weighted mean of 17.3 days saved.

Conclusions: The implementation of telemedicine solutions may significantly improve waiting times, potentially leading to more efficient and equitable healthcare systems.

Prospero registration number: CRD42023490822.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Ambient air pollution and birth outcomes: a scoping review to investigate the mediating and moderating variables-protocol. Assessment of patient preferences for assisted reproductive technology in China: a discrete choice experiment. Association between poor oral health and deterioration of appetite in older age: results from longitudinal analyses of two prospective cohorts from the UK and USA. Developing a core outcome set for assessing interventions and care for parents after neonatal death in high-income countries (iCHOOSE Neonatal study): protocol for a mixed-methods study. Associations between caregivers' health behaviours and overweight/obesity among children aged 2-6 years in Beijing, China: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1