Investigating the implementation of a Trial of Labour After Caesarean (TOLAC) delivery bundle with respect to decreasing caesarean delivery rates: a multisite quality improvement initiative.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088734
Elizabeth Miazga, Cheyanne Reed, Alisha Olsthoorn, Isabella Fan, Eliya Zhao, Jodi Shapiro, Amanda Cipolla, Modupe Tunde-Byass, Eliane M Shore
{"title":"Investigating the implementation of a Trial of Labour After Caesarean (TOLAC) delivery bundle with respect to decreasing caesarean delivery rates: a multisite quality improvement initiative.","authors":"Elizabeth Miazga, Cheyanne Reed, Alisha Olsthoorn, Isabella Fan, Eliya Zhao, Jodi Shapiro, Amanda Cipolla, Modupe Tunde-Byass, Eliane M Shore","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To study the effect of implementing a Trial of Labour After Caesarean (TOLAC) delivery bundle with respect to decreasing caesarean delivery rates across five hospitals.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective quality improvement study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Five Canadian hospital sites participated, two academic centres and three community hospitals, with annual delivery rates ranging from 2500 to 7500 per site.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>All obstetrical patients with a singleton gestation in cephalic presentation and only one previous caesarean delivery were included.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>A TOLAC bundle was introduced at each hospital site, consisting of three main interventions: (1) education for healthcare providers, (2) a TOLAC discussion sheet and (3) patient educational tools.</p><p><strong>Primary and secondary outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the caesarean delivery rate in eligible patients. Secondary outcomes included rates of trial of labour after caesarean delivery, vaginal birth after caesarean delivery and induction of labour. Balance measures included rates of uterine rupture and neonatal intensive care unit admission. Process measures included attendance at educational rounds, elements of the interventions identified in chart review and view counts for educational videos.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline caesarean delivery rate was 77% (1730 out of 2244 eligible patients). Following the introduction of the bundle, the caesarean delivery rate decreased to 71% (1497 out of 2097 eligible patients; 6% decrease, p<0.001). A significant increase in induction rate was noted from 5% preintervention to 9% postintervention (p<0.001). There was no increase in the uterine rupture or neonatal intensive care admission rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This TOLAC bundle can decrease caesarean delivery rates without negatively impacting uterine rupture or neonatal intensive care admission rates. The interventions can be easily adapted for use in different hospitals and practice environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 1","pages":"e088734"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11781111/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088734","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To study the effect of implementing a Trial of Labour After Caesarean (TOLAC) delivery bundle with respect to decreasing caesarean delivery rates across five hospitals.

Design: Prospective quality improvement study.

Setting: Five Canadian hospital sites participated, two academic centres and three community hospitals, with annual delivery rates ranging from 2500 to 7500 per site.

Participants: All obstetrical patients with a singleton gestation in cephalic presentation and only one previous caesarean delivery were included.

Interventions: A TOLAC bundle was introduced at each hospital site, consisting of three main interventions: (1) education for healthcare providers, (2) a TOLAC discussion sheet and (3) patient educational tools.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: The primary outcome was the caesarean delivery rate in eligible patients. Secondary outcomes included rates of trial of labour after caesarean delivery, vaginal birth after caesarean delivery and induction of labour. Balance measures included rates of uterine rupture and neonatal intensive care unit admission. Process measures included attendance at educational rounds, elements of the interventions identified in chart review and view counts for educational videos.

Results: The baseline caesarean delivery rate was 77% (1730 out of 2244 eligible patients). Following the introduction of the bundle, the caesarean delivery rate decreased to 71% (1497 out of 2097 eligible patients; 6% decrease, p<0.001). A significant increase in induction rate was noted from 5% preintervention to 9% postintervention (p<0.001). There was no increase in the uterine rupture or neonatal intensive care admission rates.

Conclusion: This TOLAC bundle can decrease caesarean delivery rates without negatively impacting uterine rupture or neonatal intensive care admission rates. The interventions can be easily adapted for use in different hospitals and practice environments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查剖宫产后分娩试验(TOLAC)的实施情况,以降低剖宫产率:一项多地点质量改善倡议。
目的:研究五家医院实施剖宫产后分娩试验(TOLAC)分娩束对降低剖宫产率的影响。设计:前瞻性质量改进研究。环境:参与的有五家加拿大医院、两家学术中心和三家社区医院,每家医院的年产生率在2500至7500之间。参与者:包括所有头位单胎妊娠且仅有一次剖腹产的产科患者。干预措施:在每个医院站点引入了TOLAC包,包括三个主要干预措施:(1)对医疗保健提供者的教育,(2)TOLAC讨论表和(3)患者教育工具。主要和次要结局指标:主要结局指标为符合条件患者的剖腹产率。次要结局包括剖宫产后试产率、剖宫产后顺产率和引产率。平衡措施包括子宫破裂率和新生儿重症监护病房入院率。过程测量包括参加教育轮次、图表审查中确定的干预因素和教育录像的观看次数。结果:基线剖宫产率为77%(2244例符合条件的患者中有1730例)。引入捆绑后,剖宫产率降至71%(2097名符合条件的患者中有1497名;结论:该TOLAC包束可降低剖宫产率,对子宫破裂及新生儿重症监护住院率无负面影响。这些干预措施可以很容易地适用于不同的医院和实践环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation for postoperative pain: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Understanding integrated mental healthcare for people experiencing forced migration: a realist review protocol. Use of wearable technology in improving emergency care and health outcomes for patients with urgent health complaints: protocol for a scoping review. Prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication prescribing, inappropriate medication use, prescription omission and drug interactions among older adults in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Population-based study of pharmacogenetics and pharmacokinetics in Southern African patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (PoPG): a protocol for the Namibian cohort.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1