Multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial comparing intermittent cefoxitin administration versus loading bolus followed by continuous infusion for the prevention of surgical site infection in colorectal surgery: the PROPHYLOXITIN study protocol.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088306
Quentin Saint-Genis, Julien Birckener, Vincent Gourdou, Claire Nicolle, Marc Garnier, Victor Schwindenhammer, Cécile Hannezo, Christophe Aveline, Raphaël Cinotti, Benjamin Puisney, Matthias Garot, Stéphanie Chevalier, Jean-Sébastien Aubert, Maxime Wodey, Sigismond Lasocki, Sylvain Lecoeur, Charles Jean Lagarrigue, Anne Li, Marion Faucher, Yohann Foucher, Denis Frasca, Matthieu Boisson
{"title":"Multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial comparing intermittent cefoxitin administration versus loading bolus followed by continuous infusion for the prevention of surgical site infection in colorectal surgery: the PROPHYLOXITIN study protocol.","authors":"Quentin Saint-Genis, Julien Birckener, Vincent Gourdou, Claire Nicolle, Marc Garnier, Victor Schwindenhammer, Cécile Hannezo, Christophe Aveline, Raphaël Cinotti, Benjamin Puisney, Matthias Garot, Stéphanie Chevalier, Jean-Sébastien Aubert, Maxime Wodey, Sigismond Lasocki, Sylvain Lecoeur, Charles Jean Lagarrigue, Anne Li, Marion Faucher, Yohann Foucher, Denis Frasca, Matthieu Boisson","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Surgical site infections (SSIs) are the second leading cause of healthcare-associated infections in Europe with the highest rates being reported in colorectal surgery (ranging from 9% to 30%). Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) is one of the most efficient measures for SSI prevention and should be started before surgical incision. Cefoxitin is an antibiotic widely used as SAP for colorectal surgery, but its continuous administration is currently the subject of debate due to its potential pharmacokinetic advantages. Therefore, the aim of the PROPHYLOXITIN study is to demonstrate that a loading dose followed by continuous infusion of cefoxitin during colorectal surgery (intervention group) decreases the rate of SSI compared to an intermittent bolus administration (control group).</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>The PROPHYLOXITIN study is a superiority, prospective, double-blind, randomised and multicentre study of 2000 patients undergoing colorectal surgery. The primary objective is to demonstrate the superiority of a loading dose of cefoxitin followed by continuous infusion over intermittent bolus administration in reducing the proportion of SSIs within 30 days after colorectal surgery. Subjects will be randomised 1:1 using a secure web-based random-number generator to one of two study groups. Randomised allocation of treatment will be done by minimisation and stratified according to the centre, the localisation of surgery (colon or rectum) and the type of surgical procedure (laparoscopy or laparotomy).</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>This research has been approved by an independent ethics committee and will be carried out according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Good Clinical Practice guidelines. The results of this study will be disseminated through presentation at scientific conferences and publication in peer-reviewed journals.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>EudraCT 2022-003262-20 and Clinical trial NCT05755789.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 1","pages":"e088306"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11781116/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088306","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are the second leading cause of healthcare-associated infections in Europe with the highest rates being reported in colorectal surgery (ranging from 9% to 30%). Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) is one of the most efficient measures for SSI prevention and should be started before surgical incision. Cefoxitin is an antibiotic widely used as SAP for colorectal surgery, but its continuous administration is currently the subject of debate due to its potential pharmacokinetic advantages. Therefore, the aim of the PROPHYLOXITIN study is to demonstrate that a loading dose followed by continuous infusion of cefoxitin during colorectal surgery (intervention group) decreases the rate of SSI compared to an intermittent bolus administration (control group).

Methods and analysis: The PROPHYLOXITIN study is a superiority, prospective, double-blind, randomised and multicentre study of 2000 patients undergoing colorectal surgery. The primary objective is to demonstrate the superiority of a loading dose of cefoxitin followed by continuous infusion over intermittent bolus administration in reducing the proportion of SSIs within 30 days after colorectal surgery. Subjects will be randomised 1:1 using a secure web-based random-number generator to one of two study groups. Randomised allocation of treatment will be done by minimisation and stratified according to the centre, the localisation of surgery (colon or rectum) and the type of surgical procedure (laparoscopy or laparotomy).

Ethics and dissemination: This research has been approved by an independent ethics committee and will be carried out according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Good Clinical Practice guidelines. The results of this study will be disseminated through presentation at scientific conferences and publication in peer-reviewed journals.

Trial registration number: EudraCT 2022-003262-20 and Clinical trial NCT05755789.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多中心,双盲,随机对照临床试验,比较间歇头孢西丁给药与负荷丸后持续输注预防结直肠手术手术部位感染:PROPHYLOXITIN研究方案。
导读:手术部位感染(ssi)是欧洲医疗保健相关感染的第二大原因,据报道,结直肠手术的感染率最高(从9%到30%不等)。手术抗生素预防(SAP)是预防SSI最有效的措施之一,应在手术切口前开始。头孢西丁是一种广泛用于结直肠手术的抗生素,但由于其潜在的药代动力学优势,其持续给药目前尚存争议。因此,PROPHYLOXITIN研究的目的是证明在结直肠手术期间连续输注头孢西丁(干预组)与间歇给药(对照组)相比,可降低SSI发生率。方法与分析:PROPHYLOXITIN研究是一项优势、前瞻性、双盲、随机、多中心研究,纳入了2000例接受结直肠手术的患者。本研究的主要目的是证明在减少结直肠手术后30天内持续输注头孢西丁的负荷剂量比间歇给药在减少ssi比例方面的优势。受试者将使用安全的基于网络的随机数生成器按1:1的比例随机分配到两个研究组之一。治疗的随机分配将根据中心、手术部位(结肠或直肠)和手术类型(腹腔镜或剖腹手术)进行最小化和分层。伦理和传播:本研究已得到独立伦理委员会的批准,并将根据《赫尔辛基宣言》和良好临床实践指南的原则进行。这项研究的结果将通过在科学会议上的介绍和在同行评议的期刊上发表来传播。试验注册号:EudraCT 2022-003262-20,临床试验NCT05755789。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Adapting substance use treatment for black adolescents in the US legal system: protocol for a mixed-method, exploratory, feasibility and acceptability study using the eight-step ADAPT-ITT framework. Beyond the doctor's office: a longitudinal study mapping women's experiences of the maternal healthcare journey as a pathway to reducing maternal mortality in Nigeria. Common mental health outcomes among children in conflict with the law in Africa: a systematic review protocol. Harm reduction and pharmacy practice: a scoping review of services for people who use drugs provided by pharmacy staff. Predictors of rural medical practice in Aotearoa New Zealand: a national outcomes prospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1