Exploring manual therapy in the management of irritable bowel syndrome in adults: A scoping review

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Complementary therapies in medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1016/j.ctim.2025.103136
Natalia Płóciennik-Korycka , Sara Maria Pani , Bogumiła Bruc , Paolo Contu , Magdalena Wrzesińska
{"title":"Exploring manual therapy in the management of irritable bowel syndrome in adults: A scoping review","authors":"Natalia Płóciennik-Korycka ,&nbsp;Sara Maria Pani ,&nbsp;Bogumiła Bruc ,&nbsp;Paolo Contu ,&nbsp;Magdalena Wrzesińska","doi":"10.1016/j.ctim.2025.103136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>IBS is a prevalent gut-brain interaction disorder characterized by abdominal pain and altered bowel habits, significantly affecting quality of life (QoL). IBS contributes to substantial work absenteeism and economic burdens and often coexists with other somatic and psychiatric conditions, with psychological well-being being a critical determinant of QoL. IBS sufferers often turn to MT due to dissatisfaction with conventional treatments. However, no comprehensive review has assessed the evidence for MT in treating IBS.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The objective of this review is to identify and map the available evidence on the effects of various manual therapy (MT) techniques on the biopsychosocial functioning, well-being, and QoL of individuals with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. Studies involving adults with IBS and investigating the effects of MT on biological, psychological, and social outcomes, well-being, or QoL were included. A scoping review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Study quality was assessed using The National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Study Quality Assessment Tools. The protocol for this review was registered with the Open Science Framework and is available at <span><span>https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QN4WU</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 730 records identified, 30 studies met the inclusion criteria (9 trials, 21 reviews). The interventions reviewed included osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT), acupuncture, acupressure, reflexology, traditional Chinese spinal orthopaedic manipulation, and Tuina. The most frequently assessed outcomes were biological and psychological variables, as well as QoL, with well-being being the least commonly examined.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although the results suggest potential benefits of MT in IBS treatment, they should be interpreted with caution due to the lack of robust trials, inconsistent findings, and occasional adverse events. High-quality randomized controlled trials and standardized outcome measures are necessary to validate these therapies and improve IBS management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10545,"journal":{"name":"Complementary therapies in medicine","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 103136"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary therapies in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965229925000111","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

IBS is a prevalent gut-brain interaction disorder characterized by abdominal pain and altered bowel habits, significantly affecting quality of life (QoL). IBS contributes to substantial work absenteeism and economic burdens and often coexists with other somatic and psychiatric conditions, with psychological well-being being a critical determinant of QoL. IBS sufferers often turn to MT due to dissatisfaction with conventional treatments. However, no comprehensive review has assessed the evidence for MT in treating IBS.

Objective

The objective of this review is to identify and map the available evidence on the effects of various manual therapy (MT) techniques on the biopsychosocial functioning, well-being, and QoL of individuals with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).

Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. Studies involving adults with IBS and investigating the effects of MT on biological, psychological, and social outcomes, well-being, or QoL were included. A scoping review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Study quality was assessed using The National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Study Quality Assessment Tools. The protocol for this review was registered with the Open Science Framework and is available at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QN4WU.

Results

Of 730 records identified, 30 studies met the inclusion criteria (9 trials, 21 reviews). The interventions reviewed included osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT), acupuncture, acupressure, reflexology, traditional Chinese spinal orthopaedic manipulation, and Tuina. The most frequently assessed outcomes were biological and psychological variables, as well as QoL, with well-being being the least commonly examined.

Conclusions

Although the results suggest potential benefits of MT in IBS treatment, they should be interpreted with caution due to the lack of robust trials, inconsistent findings, and occasional adverse events. High-quality randomized controlled trials and standardized outcome measures are necessary to validate these therapies and improve IBS management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Complementary therapies in medicine
Complementary therapies in medicine 医学-全科医学与补充医学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
101
审稿时长
112 days
期刊介绍: Complementary Therapies in Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed journal that has considerable appeal to anyone who seeks objective and critical information on complementary therapies or who wishes to deepen their understanding of these approaches. It will be of particular interest to healthcare practitioners including family practitioners, complementary therapists, nurses, and physiotherapists; to academics including social scientists and CAM researchers; to healthcare managers; and to patients. Complementary Therapies in Medicine aims to publish valid, relevant and rigorous research and serious discussion articles with the main purpose of improving healthcare.
期刊最新文献
Effect of music intervention on dental anxiety and fear: A bibliometric analysis of RCTs from 2004 to 2024 The State of Evidence in Acupuncture A Review of Metaanalyses and Systematic Reviews of Acupuncture Evidence Update 2017 to 2022. Oral probiotic supplementation to alleviate diarrhea induced by fluoropyrimidines or irinotecan-based chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis Efficacy of melatonin as adjunctive therapy for sepsis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Influence of Referent selection on Balance in Action Observation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1