Influence of Referent selection on Balance in Action Observation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Complementary therapies in medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1016/j.ctim.2025.103150
Tania López Hernández, Marina Caparó Ferré, Albert Salas-Huetos, Isabel Salvat Salvat, Cristina Adillón Camón
{"title":"Influence of Referent selection on Balance in Action Observation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Tania López Hernández, Marina Caparó Ferré, Albert Salas-Huetos, Isabel Salvat Salvat, Cristina Adillón Camón","doi":"10.1016/j.ctim.2025.103150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Action observation (AO) generates motor simulations in the brain, activating areas involved in actual movement and facilitating imitation. This randomized controlled trial aimed to analyze if observing actions performed by a personally selected referent improves balance in asymptomatic individuals compared to observing a standard referent.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 165 healthy participants were randomized into three groups: a control group observing landscape videos, a standard referent group observing an unidentifiable model, and a chosen referent group selecting models based on personal similarity. Balance (static and dynamic) and strength were assessed at baseline, immediately post-intervention, at 15 days, and at 4 weeks. AO exercises related to balance were viewed three times per week for four weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key findings revealed favorable changes in static balance for both the standard and chosen referent groups, particularly in challenging single-leg stances with eyes closed. Strength improvements were observed only in the standard referent group. Average adherence to the protocol was 91%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AO enhances balance and strength in healthy individuals, with referent characteristics significantly impacting outcomes. The findings suggest referent selection is a crucial factor in AO's efficacy, emphasizing AO's therapeutic potential, particularly for populations with mobility challenges. Further research should refine referent selection to optimize clinical results.</p>","PeriodicalId":10545,"journal":{"name":"Complementary therapies in medicine","volume":" ","pages":"103150"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary therapies in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2025.103150","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Action observation (AO) generates motor simulations in the brain, activating areas involved in actual movement and facilitating imitation. This randomized controlled trial aimed to analyze if observing actions performed by a personally selected referent improves balance in asymptomatic individuals compared to observing a standard referent.

Methods: A total of 165 healthy participants were randomized into three groups: a control group observing landscape videos, a standard referent group observing an unidentifiable model, and a chosen referent group selecting models based on personal similarity. Balance (static and dynamic) and strength were assessed at baseline, immediately post-intervention, at 15 days, and at 4 weeks. AO exercises related to balance were viewed three times per week for four weeks.

Results: Key findings revealed favorable changes in static balance for both the standard and chosen referent groups, particularly in challenging single-leg stances with eyes closed. Strength improvements were observed only in the standard referent group. Average adherence to the protocol was 91%.

Conclusion: AO enhances balance and strength in healthy individuals, with referent characteristics significantly impacting outcomes. The findings suggest referent selection is a crucial factor in AO's efficacy, emphasizing AO's therapeutic potential, particularly for populations with mobility challenges. Further research should refine referent selection to optimize clinical results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Complementary therapies in medicine
Complementary therapies in medicine 医学-全科医学与补充医学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
101
审稿时长
112 days
期刊介绍: Complementary Therapies in Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed journal that has considerable appeal to anyone who seeks objective and critical information on complementary therapies or who wishes to deepen their understanding of these approaches. It will be of particular interest to healthcare practitioners including family practitioners, complementary therapists, nurses, and physiotherapists; to academics including social scientists and CAM researchers; to healthcare managers; and to patients. Complementary Therapies in Medicine aims to publish valid, relevant and rigorous research and serious discussion articles with the main purpose of improving healthcare.
期刊最新文献
Influence of Referent selection on Balance in Action Observation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Effect of acupuncture on patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A multicenter randomized controlled trial The effects and optimal dosage of traditional Chinese exercises on patients with chronic ankle instability: A systematic review and meta-analysis Comparative efficacy of acupuncture therapies in premature ovarian failure: A systematic review and network meta-analysis Letter to Editor on “Tuina versus physiotherapy or a combination of both for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain: A randomized controlled trial”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1