General dental practitioners' knowledge, attitudes and practice towards psychoactive substance use screening: A systematic review

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Drug and alcohol review Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1111/dar.14002
Kevin John Fouillen, Céline Clément, Enora Aous, Delphine Le Goff, Jean Yves Le Reste, Morgane Guillou-Landreat
{"title":"General dental practitioners' knowledge, attitudes and practice towards psychoactive substance use screening: A systematic review","authors":"Kevin John Fouillen,&nbsp;Céline Clément,&nbsp;Enora Aous,&nbsp;Delphine Le Goff,&nbsp;Jean Yves Le Reste,&nbsp;Morgane Guillou-Landreat","doi":"10.1111/dar.14002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Issues</h3>\n \n <p>Dentists can play a key role in screening for psychoactive substances use. This systematic review aimed to identify the knowledge, attitudes and practices of dentists related to screening for use of psychoactive substances and the facilitating factors and barriers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Approach</h3>\n \n <p>According to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses, four databases were searched until July 2024 to identify reports relating to screening for substance use by dentists. Search terms used key words relating to knowledge, attitudes or practices concerning the screening of tobacco, alcohol or any other substance use.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Key Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty reports met the inclusion criteria for this review. In practice, dentists were more likely to identify tobacco use than alcohol or other substance use. Although the screening for tobacco was widely performed by dentists, the proposal of interventions was less frequent. Despite the opinion of many dentists that screening is part of their professional role, particularly tobacco, their knowledge of how to identify and intervene seemed low. Lack of knowledge or training were identified as barriers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Identification of these factors should encourage greater diffusion of recommended tools for screening and development of initial and continuing training for dentists. These factors should convince decision-makers to help dentists to identify referral solutions, in particular coordinated care pathways, and to consider the acceptability and feasibility of the screening tools available to dentists.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Tobacco use was more frequently identified than was other substances, screening was always more frequent than interventions, and lack of training proved to be the main barriers to screening. Education and training in the screening of psychoactive substance use is a key factor in encouraging improved practices, particularly on intervention following detection and on substances other than tobacco.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11318,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol review","volume":"44 2","pages":"667-680"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dar.14002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dar.14002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Issues

Dentists can play a key role in screening for psychoactive substances use. This systematic review aimed to identify the knowledge, attitudes and practices of dentists related to screening for use of psychoactive substances and the facilitating factors and barriers.

Approach

According to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses, four databases were searched until July 2024 to identify reports relating to screening for substance use by dentists. Search terms used key words relating to knowledge, attitudes or practices concerning the screening of tobacco, alcohol or any other substance use.

Key Findings

Twenty reports met the inclusion criteria for this review. In practice, dentists were more likely to identify tobacco use than alcohol or other substance use. Although the screening for tobacco was widely performed by dentists, the proposal of interventions was less frequent. Despite the opinion of many dentists that screening is part of their professional role, particularly tobacco, their knowledge of how to identify and intervene seemed low. Lack of knowledge or training were identified as barriers.

Implications

Identification of these factors should encourage greater diffusion of recommended tools for screening and development of initial and continuing training for dentists. These factors should convince decision-makers to help dentists to identify referral solutions, in particular coordinated care pathways, and to consider the acceptability and feasibility of the screening tools available to dentists.

Conclusion

Tobacco use was more frequently identified than was other substances, screening was always more frequent than interventions, and lack of training proved to be the main barriers to screening. Education and training in the screening of psychoactive substance use is a key factor in encouraging improved practices, particularly on intervention following detection and on substances other than tobacco.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全科牙科医生对精神活性物质使用筛查的知识、态度和做法:系统回顾。
问题:牙医可以在筛查精神活性物质使用方面发挥关键作用。本系统回顾旨在了解牙医对精神活性物质使用筛查的知识、态度和做法,以及促进因素和障碍。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目,在2024年7月之前检索了四个数据库,以确定与牙医药物使用筛查有关的报告。搜索词使用的关键词与筛查烟草、酒精或任何其他物质使用的知识、态度或做法有关。主要发现:20份报告符合本综述的纳入标准。在实践中,牙医更容易识别吸烟,而不是酒精或其他物质使用。虽然牙医广泛进行烟草筛查,但提出干预措施的频率较低。尽管许多牙医认为筛查是他们专业职责的一部分,特别是烟草,但他们对如何识别和干预的知识似乎很低。缺乏知识或培训被认为是障碍。意义:这些因素的识别应该鼓励推荐的工具更广泛的传播,以筛选和发展牙医的初始和持续培训。这些因素应该说服决策者帮助牙医确定转诊解决方案,特别是协调护理途径,并考虑牙医可用的筛查工具的可接受性和可行性。结论:吸烟比其他物质更容易被发现,筛查总是比干预更频繁,缺乏培训被证明是筛查的主要障碍。在筛查精神活性物质使用方面的教育和培训是鼓励改进做法的关键因素,特别是在检测后的干预和烟草以外物质方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol review
Drug and alcohol review SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Review is an international meeting ground for the views, expertise and experience of all those involved in studying alcohol, tobacco and drug problems. Contributors to the Journal examine and report on alcohol and drug use from a wide range of clinical, biomedical, epidemiological, psychological and sociological perspectives. Drug and Alcohol Review particularly encourages the submission of papers which have a harm reduction perspective. However, all philosophies will find a place in the Journal: the principal criterion for publication of papers is their quality.
期刊最新文献
The Need to Revitalise Drug Use Monitoring to Keep Pace With a More Dynamic, Digitally Enabled and Globally Connected Drug Market: A Commentary on Griffiths et al. Alcohol Policies in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations Region-Challenges, Opportunities and Moving Forward. Epidemiology of Hallucinogen Microdosing Among Young Adults in the United States: A National Study. Regulation of Alcohol-Free and Low-Alcohol Drinks: Learning From a Comparative Analysis of Eight Countries. A Deep Learning Model for Absolute Risk Prediction of Alcohol Use Disorder in Adolescents and Young Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1