Inhalable Nano Formulation of Cabazitaxel: A Comparative Study with Intravenous Route.

IF 4.4 4区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Macromolecular bioscience Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1002/mabi.202400567
Elif Kaga, Sadik Kaga, Korhan Altunbas, Nurullah Okumus
{"title":"Inhalable Nano Formulation of Cabazitaxel: A Comparative Study with Intravenous Route.","authors":"Elif Kaga, Sadik Kaga, Korhan Altunbas, Nurullah Okumus","doi":"10.1002/mabi.202400567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chemotherapy is generally given by intravenous (IV) administration which provides higher bioavailability than other systemic routes. However, in the case of lung cancer, the pulmonary (INH) route is the other choice for inhalable formulations. In the study, biochemical and histological parameters of Cabazitaxel (CBZ) free (2 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>) and nanoparticle (NP) (2 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> CBZ equivalent) formulations are investigated after IV and INH administration in rats. The nanoformulation of CBZ is obtained using PEGylated polystyrene (PEG-PST) nanoparticles obtained by PISA. While a nose and head-only device is used for INH administration, a jugular vein is used as the IV route. Blood samples (blank, 24 h, and 48 h) are collected via carotid artery cannulas without handling in metabolism cages. According to biochemical parameters, free CBZ formulation applied via IV or INH route shows higher systemic toxicity. On the other hand, the nanoformulation of CBZ showed no signs of toxicity in both IV or INH routes. Higher and longer retention is observed in the case of inhaled nanoformulation. Histological analysis showed higher alveolar macrophage migration for inhaled nanoformulation due to enhanced retention. Results showed that nanotechnology and the lung defense system gave the advantage to end up with an inhalable nanomedicine formulation for lung cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":18103,"journal":{"name":"Macromolecular bioscience","volume":" ","pages":"e2400567"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Macromolecular bioscience","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.202400567","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chemotherapy is generally given by intravenous (IV) administration which provides higher bioavailability than other systemic routes. However, in the case of lung cancer, the pulmonary (INH) route is the other choice for inhalable formulations. In the study, biochemical and histological parameters of Cabazitaxel (CBZ) free (2 mg kg-1) and nanoparticle (NP) (2 mg kg-1 CBZ equivalent) formulations are investigated after IV and INH administration in rats. The nanoformulation of CBZ is obtained using PEGylated polystyrene (PEG-PST) nanoparticles obtained by PISA. While a nose and head-only device is used for INH administration, a jugular vein is used as the IV route. Blood samples (blank, 24 h, and 48 h) are collected via carotid artery cannulas without handling in metabolism cages. According to biochemical parameters, free CBZ formulation applied via IV or INH route shows higher systemic toxicity. On the other hand, the nanoformulation of CBZ showed no signs of toxicity in both IV or INH routes. Higher and longer retention is observed in the case of inhaled nanoformulation. Histological analysis showed higher alveolar macrophage migration for inhaled nanoformulation due to enhanced retention. Results showed that nanotechnology and the lung defense system gave the advantage to end up with an inhalable nanomedicine formulation for lung cancer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Macromolecular bioscience
Macromolecular bioscience 生物-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.20%
发文量
211
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Macromolecular Bioscience is a leading journal at the intersection of polymer and materials sciences with life science and medicine. With an Impact Factor of 2.895 (2018 Journal Impact Factor, Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2019)), it is currently ranked among the top biomaterials and polymer journals. Macromolecular Bioscience offers an attractive mixture of high-quality Reviews, Feature Articles, Communications, and Full Papers. With average reviewing times below 30 days, publication times of 2.5 months and listing in all major indices, including Medline, Macromolecular Bioscience is the journal of choice for your best contributions at the intersection of polymer and life sciences.
期刊最新文献
Cellular Behaviors of Human Dermal Fibroblasts on Pyrolytically Stripped Carbon Nanofiber's Surface Issue Information: Macromol. Biosci. 3/2025 RETRACTION: Generation of Haploid Spermatids on Silk Fibroin-Alginate-Laminin-Based Porous 3D Scaffolds. Combination of Dendrimers and Exosomes: Implications for Biomedical Applications. Silk Fibroin-Based Hydrogels Supplemented with Decellularized Extracellular Matrix and Gelatin Facilitate 3D Bioprinting for Meniscus Tissue Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1