Regional Analgesia in Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1053/j.jvca.2024.12.043
Yi Ren, Lijing Li, Jingchun Gao, Lei Hua, Tiehua Zheng, Fang Wang, Jianmin Zhang
{"title":"Regional Analgesia in Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Yi Ren, Lijing Li, Jingchun Gao, Lei Hua, Tiehua Zheng, Fang Wang, Jianmin Zhang","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2024.12.043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Various regional analgesia techniques are used to reduce postoperative pain in pediatric patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgeries. This study aimed to determine the relative efficacy of regional analgesic interventions. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify all randomized controlled studies evaluating the effects of regional block after cardiothoracic surgery. The primary endpoint was opioid consumption within 24 hours postoperatively, Pain scores, the time to first rescue analgesic, and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting were also collected. A Bayesian NMA was performed to compare the outcomes of interest. A total of 24 studies involving 1602 patients and 13 regional blocks were included. All techniques reduced opioid consumption within 24 hours postoperatively. The largest decrease was in the thoracic retrolaminar block group, with a WMD of -0.97 (95% CrI -1.1, -0.84) mg/kg morphine equivalent. In terms of pain scores, there was no significant difference between any block and the control at any time point except for the thoracic retrolaminar block group at 0 hours postoperatively. In addition, all regional blocks prolonged the time to first rescue analgesic, which was the longest in the pectoral nerve block group. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was the lowest in the epidural anesthesia group, followed by the transversus thoracis muscle plane block group. Regional anesthesia revealed significant opioid-sparing effects following pediatric cardiothoracic surgery. However, indirect comparisons are limited because of the heterogeneity of previous studies, and direct comparisons are needed to establish the relative efficacies of different blocks.</p>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2024.12.043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Various regional analgesia techniques are used to reduce postoperative pain in pediatric patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgeries. This study aimed to determine the relative efficacy of regional analgesic interventions. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify all randomized controlled studies evaluating the effects of regional block after cardiothoracic surgery. The primary endpoint was opioid consumption within 24 hours postoperatively, Pain scores, the time to first rescue analgesic, and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting were also collected. A Bayesian NMA was performed to compare the outcomes of interest. A total of 24 studies involving 1602 patients and 13 regional blocks were included. All techniques reduced opioid consumption within 24 hours postoperatively. The largest decrease was in the thoracic retrolaminar block group, with a WMD of -0.97 (95% CrI -1.1, -0.84) mg/kg morphine equivalent. In terms of pain scores, there was no significant difference between any block and the control at any time point except for the thoracic retrolaminar block group at 0 hours postoperatively. In addition, all regional blocks prolonged the time to first rescue analgesic, which was the longest in the pectoral nerve block group. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was the lowest in the epidural anesthesia group, followed by the transversus thoracis muscle plane block group. Regional anesthesia revealed significant opioid-sparing effects following pediatric cardiothoracic surgery. However, indirect comparisons are limited because of the heterogeneity of previous studies, and direct comparisons are needed to establish the relative efficacies of different blocks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
17.90%
发文量
606
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.
期刊最新文献
To Be, or Not to Be: Is It Better to Be HFrEF or HFpEF or Somewhere In Between (HFmrEF)? Postoperative Liver Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation With Extracorporeal Life Support and 1-Year Mortality-A Cohort Study. Anesthetic and Surgical Management of Topsy-Turvy Heart: A Case Series Highlighting Cardiopulmonary and Airway Challenges. Advances in Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy. I. Cardiac Myosin Inhibitors. Comparative Analysis of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheotomy and Surgical Tracheotomy in Critically Ill Patients: Outcomes and Complications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1