Effect of postoperative peripheral nerve blocks on the analgesia nociception index under propofol anesthesia: an observational study.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1007/s10877-025-01264-4
Motoi Kumagai, Naoto Yamada, Masahiro Wakimoto, Shohei Ogawa, Sho Watanabe, Kotaro Sato, Kenji S Suzuki
{"title":"Effect of postoperative peripheral nerve blocks on the analgesia nociception index under propofol anesthesia: an observational study.","authors":"Motoi Kumagai, Naoto Yamada, Masahiro Wakimoto, Shohei Ogawa, Sho Watanabe, Kotaro Sato, Kenji S Suzuki","doi":"10.1007/s10877-025-01264-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The analgesia nociception index (ANI), also referred to as the high frequency variability index (HFVI), is reported to be an objective measure of nociception. This study investigated changes in ANI after peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) under general anesthesia. Understanding these changes could enhance assessment of PNB efficacy before emergence from general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study enrolled 30 patients undergoing elective upper limb surgery. After surgery, median and maximum ANI values were recorded during two periods: a 5-minute period before PNB and a 20-minute period after PNB. The numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain was assessed twice: immediately after emergence from general anesthesia (N1) and the maximum pain experienced by the following morning after PNB effects subsided (N2). The difference in ANI before and after PNB was tested using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ANI significantly increased after PNB in both the median (pre vs. post PNB value: 53.5 [44.0-68.0] vs. 59.0 [47.0-78.3], median [interquartile range]; P < 0.05) and maximum values (64.0 [56.3-79.5] vs. 74.5 [61.5-85.3]; P < 0.01). Secondary analysis revealed that significant ANI increases in both median (48.0 [42.3-66.5] vs. 61.0 [50.0-76.5]; P < 0.01) and maximum values (58.5 [50.3-75.3] vs. 76.0 [71.8-83.5]; P < 0.01) in the 18 cases with N2 ≥ 4 whereas no statistical differences were observed in the 12 cases with N2 < 4.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The increased ANI value after PNB under propofol anesthesia may be a valuable indicator for assessing PNB efficacy.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>UMIN000050334.</p><p><strong>Date of registration: </strong>February 28, 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01264-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The analgesia nociception index (ANI), also referred to as the high frequency variability index (HFVI), is reported to be an objective measure of nociception. This study investigated changes in ANI after peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) under general anesthesia. Understanding these changes could enhance assessment of PNB efficacy before emergence from general anesthesia.

Methods: This study enrolled 30 patients undergoing elective upper limb surgery. After surgery, median and maximum ANI values were recorded during two periods: a 5-minute period before PNB and a 20-minute period after PNB. The numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain was assessed twice: immediately after emergence from general anesthesia (N1) and the maximum pain experienced by the following morning after PNB effects subsided (N2). The difference in ANI before and after PNB was tested using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results: The ANI significantly increased after PNB in both the median (pre vs. post PNB value: 53.5 [44.0-68.0] vs. 59.0 [47.0-78.3], median [interquartile range]; P < 0.05) and maximum values (64.0 [56.3-79.5] vs. 74.5 [61.5-85.3]; P < 0.01). Secondary analysis revealed that significant ANI increases in both median (48.0 [42.3-66.5] vs. 61.0 [50.0-76.5]; P < 0.01) and maximum values (58.5 [50.3-75.3] vs. 76.0 [71.8-83.5]; P < 0.01) in the 18 cases with N2 ≥ 4 whereas no statistical differences were observed in the 12 cases with N2 < 4.

Conclusion: The increased ANI value after PNB under propofol anesthesia may be a valuable indicator for assessing PNB efficacy.

Trial registration number: UMIN000050334.

Date of registration: February 28, 2023.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
期刊最新文献
Characterizing drivers of change in intraoperative cerebral saturation using supervised machine learning. Personalized intraoperative arterial pressure management and mitochondrial oxygen tension in patients having major non-cardiac surgery: a pilot substudy of the IMPROVE trial. Accuracy of remote, video-based supraventricular tachycardia detection in patients undergoing elective electrical cardioversion: a prospective cohort. Effect of postoperative peripheral nerve blocks on the analgesia nociception index under propofol anesthesia: an observational study. Cost-effectiveness of data driven personalised antibiotic dosing in critically ill patients with sepsis or septic shock.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1