The Effectiveness of Online Mindfulness Training for Psychologists - A Brief Report.

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychological Reports Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1177/00332941241311008
Judy A Pickard, Frank P Deane, Craig J Gonsalvez
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Online Mindfulness Training for Psychologists - A Brief Report.","authors":"Judy A Pickard, Frank P Deane, Craig J Gonsalvez","doi":"10.1177/00332941241311008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Mindfulness training (MT) in healthcare training has been associated with improvement in mental wellbeing and clinical skills such as empathy. Despite this, it is often challenging for professional psychology programs to include MT in the curriculum due to competing coursework demands and staffing requirements. The current study aimed to determine whether changes in mindfulness, self-compassion and tolerance of uncertainty were equivalent for those completing MT face-to-face on campus or online.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Ninety-eight professional psychology trainees completed pre-post measures of Mindfulness, Self-compassion, and Tolerance of Uncertainty. Fifty-eight participants completed it on campus and 40 participants completed it online.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A series of one-way ANOVAs found no significant differences in change between the two delivery mode groups on seven of the eight variables. There was a very small significant difference for self-compassion with those in the campus group showing slightly higher increases compared to the online group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Changes in mindfulness and related variables appear to be similar whether MT occurs face-to-face or via online delivery. Thus, providing online MT may address difficulties related to staffing and timetabling that previously prohibited its inclusion in coursework.</p>","PeriodicalId":21149,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Reports","volume":" ","pages":"332941241311008"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941241311008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Mindfulness training (MT) in healthcare training has been associated with improvement in mental wellbeing and clinical skills such as empathy. Despite this, it is often challenging for professional psychology programs to include MT in the curriculum due to competing coursework demands and staffing requirements. The current study aimed to determine whether changes in mindfulness, self-compassion and tolerance of uncertainty were equivalent for those completing MT face-to-face on campus or online.

Method: Ninety-eight professional psychology trainees completed pre-post measures of Mindfulness, Self-compassion, and Tolerance of Uncertainty. Fifty-eight participants completed it on campus and 40 participants completed it online.

Results: A series of one-way ANOVAs found no significant differences in change between the two delivery mode groups on seven of the eight variables. There was a very small significant difference for self-compassion with those in the campus group showing slightly higher increases compared to the online group.

Conclusion: Changes in mindfulness and related variables appear to be similar whether MT occurs face-to-face or via online delivery. Thus, providing online MT may address difficulties related to staffing and timetabling that previously prohibited its inclusion in coursework.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心理学家在线正念训练的有效性——一个简短的报告。
目的:医疗保健培训中的正念训练(MT)与心理健康和同理心等临床技能的改善有关。尽管如此,由于竞争性的课程要求和人员需求,将MT纳入专业心理学课程通常是具有挑战性的。目前的研究旨在确定正念、自我同情和对不确定性的容忍度的变化对那些在校园里面对面完成MT或在线完成MT的人是否相同。方法:98名专业心理学学员完成了正念、自我同情和不确定性容忍度的职前测量。58名参与者在校园内完成,40名参与者在线完成。结果:一系列的单因素方差分析发现,两种分娩方式组在8个变量中的7个变量上的变化没有显著差异。在自我同情方面,校园组的人比网络组的人表现出轻微的显著差异。结论:无论是面对面的MT还是在线的MT,正念和相关变量的变化似乎是相似的。因此,提供在线MT可以解决与人员配备和时间表相关的困难,这些困难以前禁止将其纳入课程作业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Reports
Psychological Reports PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
171
期刊最新文献
Does Considering the Consequences of Selective Exposure Help Reduce Selective Exposure Behaviors? Transforming Passive Employee Engagement Into Active Engagement: Supervisor Development Feedback Valences on Feedback-Seeking Behavior. Non-Cognitive Adaptive Resourcefulness: Scrutiny of Its Multidimensionality and Nomological Validity. The Impact of Illegitimate Tasks on Volunteer Participation: The Perspective of Psychological Capital. The Only way is up? How Different Facets of Employee and Supervisor Perfectionism Help or Hinder Career Development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1