Integrating knowledge-based planning and noncoplanar oblique VMAT arcs: A study of dose to the heart and immune cells in thoracic radiotherapy

Brennan Diedrich, Justin Roper, Benjamin Hopkins, Sibo Tian, Shadab Momin, Eduard Schreibmann, Aparna H. Kesarwala, Kirk Luca
{"title":"Integrating knowledge-based planning and noncoplanar oblique VMAT arcs: A study of dose to the heart and immune cells in thoracic radiotherapy","authors":"Brennan Diedrich,&nbsp;Justin Roper,&nbsp;Benjamin Hopkins,&nbsp;Sibo Tian,&nbsp;Shadab Momin,&nbsp;Eduard Schreibmann,&nbsp;Aparna H. Kesarwala,&nbsp;Kirk Luca","doi":"10.1016/j.tipsro.2025.100301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Recent patient studies have linked higher immune cell doses with worse quality of life and survival. For thoracic radiotherapy, heart dose is a major contributor to the effective dose to immune cells (EDIC).</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study investigates heart and immune cell doses for plans optimized using a cardiac-sparing knowledge-based planning (KBP) model and the impact of carefully crafted beam geometry.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Sixteen stage III NSCLC patients previously treated to 60 Gy in 30 fractions using coplanar VMAT arcs were replanned using a cardiac-sparing KBP model with either the clinical field arrangement or noncoplanar oblique arcs that prioritize heart sparing. The cardiac-sparing KBP model consisted of fifteen substructures, all of which were used during optimization. All plans were normalized to 95% PTV coverage at 60 Gy. Statistical significance was assessed for EDIC (Jin Model), along with mean doses to the heart, lungs, body, and both the mean dose and D0.03 cc values for cardiac substructures, using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Compared to the clinically treated plans with the same beam geometry, cardiac-sparing KBP reduced mean heart dose from 8.50 Gy to 4.09 Gy and EDIC from 4.27 Gy to 3.81 Gy (p &lt; 0.001). For the novel arcs, the mean heart dose was reduced to 3.70 Gy, significantly lower than KBP with clinical beam geometry (p = 0.001). EDIC, however, was equivalent. No statistically meaningful differences were observed for the remaining organs at risk, and all plans met institutional planning goals.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Cardiac-sparing RapidPlan is a valuable tool for reducing heart dose and lowering EDIC in NSCLC patients. Additional heart sparing is possible by strategically crafting noncoplanar oblique beams to minimize heart dose.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36328,"journal":{"name":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 100301"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11780144/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632425000022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Recent patient studies have linked higher immune cell doses with worse quality of life and survival. For thoracic radiotherapy, heart dose is a major contributor to the effective dose to immune cells (EDIC).

Purpose

This study investigates heart and immune cell doses for plans optimized using a cardiac-sparing knowledge-based planning (KBP) model and the impact of carefully crafted beam geometry.

Methods

Sixteen stage III NSCLC patients previously treated to 60 Gy in 30 fractions using coplanar VMAT arcs were replanned using a cardiac-sparing KBP model with either the clinical field arrangement or noncoplanar oblique arcs that prioritize heart sparing. The cardiac-sparing KBP model consisted of fifteen substructures, all of which were used during optimization. All plans were normalized to 95% PTV coverage at 60 Gy. Statistical significance was assessed for EDIC (Jin Model), along with mean doses to the heart, lungs, body, and both the mean dose and D0.03 cc values for cardiac substructures, using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results

Compared to the clinically treated plans with the same beam geometry, cardiac-sparing KBP reduced mean heart dose from 8.50 Gy to 4.09 Gy and EDIC from 4.27 Gy to 3.81 Gy (p < 0.001). For the novel arcs, the mean heart dose was reduced to 3.70 Gy, significantly lower than KBP with clinical beam geometry (p = 0.001). EDIC, however, was equivalent. No statistically meaningful differences were observed for the remaining organs at risk, and all plans met institutional planning goals.

Conclusion

Cardiac-sparing RapidPlan is a valuable tool for reducing heart dose and lowering EDIC in NSCLC patients. Additional heart sparing is possible by strategically crafting noncoplanar oblique beams to minimize heart dose.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:最近的患者研究表明,较高的免疫细胞剂量与较差的生活质量和生存率有关。目的:本研究调查了使用保心知识规划(KBP)模型优化计划的心脏和免疫细胞剂量,以及精心设计的射束几何形状的影响:16例III期NSCLC患者之前曾接受过共面VMAT弧线治疗,每30个小节治疗60Gy,研究人员使用一个心脏保护KBP模型对其进行了重新规划,该模型既可以采用临床领域的安排,也可以采用优先保护心脏的非共面斜弧线。心脏保全 KBP 模型由 15 个子结构组成,优化过程中使用了所有这些子结构。所有计划均归一化为 95% PTV 覆盖率,60 Gy。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验评估了EDIC(Jin模型)以及心脏、肺部、全身的平均剂量,以及心脏亚结构的平均剂量和D0.03 cc值的统计意义:结果:与具有相同射束几何形状的临床治疗计划相比,保心KBP将心脏的平均剂量从8.50 Gy减少到4.09 Gy,EDIC从4.27 Gy减少到3.81 Gy(p 结论:保心KBP计划可将心脏的平均剂量从8.50 Gy减少到4.09 Gy,EDIC从4.27 Gy减少到3.81 Gy:心脏保护 RapidPlan 是减少 NSCLC 患者心脏剂量和降低 EDIC 的重要工具。通过策略性地设计非共面斜束,最大限度地减少心脏剂量,还可以进一步保护心脏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
67 days
期刊最新文献
Patient experience preparing for prostate cancer radiotherapy Training for tomorrow: Establishing a worldwide curriculum in online adaptive radiation therapy Pan-Canadian assessment of image guided adaptive radiation therapy and the role of the radiation therapist Geometric and dosimetric evaluation of CTV contour adaptations by radiation therapists for adaptive prostate radiotherapy on a 0.35 T MR-Linac Integrating knowledge-based planning and noncoplanar oblique VMAT arcs: A study of dose to the heart and immune cells in thoracic radiotherapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1