{"title":"Impact of Personnel Scarcity on Urolithiasis Treatment: A Comparative Study of the Pre- and Post-Pandemic Eras.","authors":"Ozan Yurdakul, Christian Seitz, Altug Tuncel, Julian Veser, Melanie Hassler, Shahrokh Shariat, Mesut Remzi","doi":"10.1159/000543644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This research investigates the influence of the medical personnel shortage on the treatment of urolithiasis by comparing the complication rates in patients with urinary stones who undergo ureterorenoscopy with laser lithotripsy before and after the emergence of this unprecedented situation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred sixty patients undergoing ureterorenoscopy with laser lithotripsy for urolithiasis were retrospectively evaluated, segmented into pre- and post-pandemic cohorts. Complications that occurred preoperatively (during the waiting period for operation), intraoperatively, and postoperatively were documented to compare the complication rates between the two cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The investigation demonstrated a significant elevation of complications during the preoperative waiting period in the post-pandemic cohort (p < .001), concurrent with a substantial increase in the median waiting time from 20 days to 94 days (p < .001). No significant differences were present in intra- and postoperative complications between the two cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the new era of personnel shortage, increased complication rates during the preoperative waiting time were observed, concomitant with a significant increase in the waiting times for surgery. This novel challenge of increased preoperative morbidity also led to additional resource consumption. It is imperative to adapt the therapeutic landscape of urolithiasis to the new circumstances.</p>","PeriodicalId":23414,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Internationalis","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Internationalis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543644","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: This research investigates the influence of the medical personnel shortage on the treatment of urolithiasis by comparing the complication rates in patients with urinary stones who undergo ureterorenoscopy with laser lithotripsy before and after the emergence of this unprecedented situation.
Methods: One hundred sixty patients undergoing ureterorenoscopy with laser lithotripsy for urolithiasis were retrospectively evaluated, segmented into pre- and post-pandemic cohorts. Complications that occurred preoperatively (during the waiting period for operation), intraoperatively, and postoperatively were documented to compare the complication rates between the two cohorts.
Results: The investigation demonstrated a significant elevation of complications during the preoperative waiting period in the post-pandemic cohort (p < .001), concurrent with a substantial increase in the median waiting time from 20 days to 94 days (p < .001). No significant differences were present in intra- and postoperative complications between the two cohorts.
Conclusion: In the new era of personnel shortage, increased complication rates during the preoperative waiting time were observed, concomitant with a significant increase in the waiting times for surgery. This novel challenge of increased preoperative morbidity also led to additional resource consumption. It is imperative to adapt the therapeutic landscape of urolithiasis to the new circumstances.
期刊介绍:
Concise but fully substantiated international reports of clinically oriented research into science and current management of urogenital disorders form the nucleus of original as well as basic research papers. These are supplemented by up-to-date reviews by international experts on the state-of-the-art of key topics of clinical urological practice. Essential topics receiving regular coverage include the introduction of new techniques and instrumentation as well as the evaluation of new functional tests and diagnostic methods. Special attention is given to advances in surgical techniques and clinical oncology. The regular publication of selected case reports represents the great variation in urological disease and illustrates treatment solutions in singular cases.